Jump to content

Welcome to canucks.com Vancouver Canucks homepage

Photo

Homeland Security warns of 'cyber 9/11' if US doesn't pass CISPA 2.0


  • Please log in to reply
30 replies to this topic

#1 key2thecup

key2thecup

    Canucks Second-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,991 posts
  • Joined: 28-November 07

Posted 26 January 2013 - 05:18 PM

Homeland Security's Napolitano invokes 9/11 to push for CISPA 2.0



Posted Image
U.S. Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano.(Reuters / Baz Ratner)

In an attempt to scare the public with a looming cyber attack on US infrastructure, US Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano is once again pushing Congress to pass legislation allowing the government to have greater control over the Internet.

Napolitano issued the warnings Thursday, claiming that inaction could result in a “cyber 9/11” attack that could knock out water, electricity and gas, causing destruction similar to that left behind by Hurricane Sandy.

Napolitano said that in order to prevent such an attack, Congress must pass legislation that gives the US government greater access to the Internet and cybersecurity information from the private sector. Such a bill, known as CISPA or Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act, was already introduced last year, but failed to pass in Congress due to concerns expressed by businesses and privacy advocates.

“We shouldn’t wait until there is a 9/11 in the cyber world. There are things we can and should be doing right now that, if not prevent, would mitigate the extent of the damage,” Napolitano said in a speech at the Wilson Center, a Washington, DC think tank.

Defense Secretary Leon Panetta has also been a strong advocate for increased governmental grip on the web and in October warned that the US is facing a possible “cyber-Pearl Harbor” by foreign hackers.

“A cyber attack perpetuated by nation states or violent extremist groups could be as destructive as the terrorist attack of 9/11,” he said during a speech. “Such a destructive cyber terrorist attack could paralyze the nation.”

Last September, Napolitano reiterated disappointment with Congress for failing to pass the cybersecurity legislation in August.

“Attacks are coming all the time,” she said in a speech at the Social Good Summit. “They are coming from different sources, they take different forms. But they are increasing in seriousness and sophistication.”

Despite Homeland Security’s constant warnings that hackers could shut down critical US infrastructure, the Cybersecurity Act of 2012 was shot down by the Senate in August, even though the Obama administration had pushed for the bill in numerous hearings and briefings.

Privacy advocates had expressed concern that the US government would be able to read Americans’ personal e-mails, online chat conversations, and other personal information that only private companies and servers might have access to. The head of the National Security Agency promised it wouldn’t abuse its power, but critics have remained skeptical.

A coalition of Democrats this year pledged to make this legislation a priority.

“Given all that relies on a safe and secure Internet, it is vital that we do what’s necessary to protect ourselves from hackers, cyber thieves, and terrorists,” said Sen. Tom Carper (D-Del.), the new chairman of the Homeland Security Committee.

The White House is also working on an executive order that would encourage companies to meet government cybersecurity standards.

http://rt.com/usa/news/napolitano-us-cyber-attack-761/




Napolitano warns of imminent 'cyber 9/11' if US doesn't take preventative action

Is the US threatened with a technological 9/11, as cyber-warfare becomes more and more of a threat to American interests?

That's what Homeland Security chief Janet Napolitano believes. On Thursday, Napolitano warned that a "cyber 9/11" could happen "imminently."

Speaking at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars on Thursday, she the audience: "We shouldn't wait until there is a 9/11 in the cyber world. There are things we can and should be doing right now that, if not prevent, would mitigate the extent of damage," according to Reuters.

Napolitano has been pushing for Congress to pass a bill that would permit the government to share more tech security information with the private sector, as much of the infrastructure a terrorist cyber-attack would target likely rests in private hands.

At the 2012 Social Good Summit in September, Napolitano reiterated her disappointment with Congress for failing to pass cyber-security legislation, wrote Mashable, claiming that she wanted to construct a "cooperative" cyber-security relationship between the government and private sector interests.

At the speech, which was co-sponsored with the Aspen Institute's Homeland Security Center, Napolitano noted that "The clarion call is here and we need to be dealing with this very urgently."
"Attacks are coming all the time. They are coming from different sources, they take different forms. But they are increasing in seriousness and sophistication," she added.

Napolitano's talk also provoked discussion after she noted the Department of Homeland Security does not intend to meet a Congressional requirement that all foreign cargo shipped to the US be scanned for dangerous materials, wrote NTI, as it would be "extraordinarily expensive" to implement.
Napolitano also delved into immigration law and the DHS's relationships with international partners, and noted that the department has made great strides in both securing and keeping an eye on the border with Mexico, according to C-Span.

http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/news/regions/americas/united-states/130125/napolitano-warns-imminent-cyber-911-if-us-doesnt



  • 0

Dr. Ron Paul 2016!

Dr. Rand Paul 2016!

INFJ


#2 Hobble

Hobble

    Canucks All-Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,676 posts
  • Joined: 27-June 07

Posted 26 January 2013 - 05:30 PM

Yeah, okay there...

Just update Norton.
  • 0

#3 Electro Rock

Electro Rock

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,634 posts
  • Joined: 17-March 04

Posted 26 January 2013 - 05:47 PM

Even police states are highly vulnerable to cyber attack, from outside at least. This is just another Orwellian measure aimed at U.S. citizens.
  • 1
"The American people will never knowingly adopt Socialism. But under the name of 'liberalism' they will adopt every fragment of the Socialist program, until one day America will be a Socialist nation, without knowing how it happened."

Norman Thomas

#4 jmfaminoff

jmfaminoff

    Canucks Second-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,831 posts
  • Joined: 21-February 05

Posted 26 January 2013 - 05:48 PM

Because most of us do not encrypt our email, the government already sifts through it as it passes throug the AT&T servers.
  • 0

#5 Lancaster

Lancaster

    Canucks Rookie

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,514 posts
  • Joined: 03-September 12

Posted 26 January 2013 - 05:49 PM

I'm surprised they're not saying the attacks will originate from Canada, lol.
  • 0

#6 Buggernut

Buggernut

    Canucks Hall-of-Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 32,526 posts
  • Joined: 15-March 03

Posted 26 January 2013 - 05:56 PM

How many are expected to die in a "cyber-9/11"?
  • 0

#7 Caboose

Caboose

    Marlies Franchise Player

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,136 posts
  • Joined: 01-September 10

Posted 26 January 2013 - 06:00 PM

How many are expected to die in a "cyber-9/11"?


At least 7 enraged nerds.
  • 0

Posted Image

 

Vintage Canuck's #1 Supporter


#8 sedated

sedated

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,728 posts
  • Joined: 08-October 05

Posted 26 January 2013 - 06:16 PM

Not really sure how sifting through private e-mails exactly saves people from a cyber terrorist attack. They aren't very good cyber terrorists if they send information through things they know can be traced and read. I think people more or less have to give in to the fact that e-mails, sites they visit, forums, and everything are probably looked upon by someone. Your ISP can see it, and whoever else does on top of that.

Contrary to popular belief, stuff that 'hides' your IP doesn't hide the fact it's coming from or going to your computer, and your ISP knows about your computer. And not only that, think of other people that use the same type of things you do. You end up inevitably having a target painted on you and probably more liable to be tracked down because they'd want to see why you were trying to hide. They might not be able to see what you're doing since it becomes encrypted, but they can see the encrypted stuff going to you. They'd see the encrypted data being downloaded in roughly the size of a download of a song or something, etc.

In short, just believe that other people read what you say sometimes. And people might know about weird sites you visit.
  • 0

#9 TOMapleLaughs

TOMapleLaughs

    Canucks Hall-of-Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 32,559 posts
  • Joined: 19-September 05

Posted 26 January 2013 - 06:17 PM

So there will be a false flag operation designed to justify the lockdown of the internet? Okay.

What's funny about this announcement is that Anonymous just hacked into a government website and threatened to activate a 'web warhead' of sorts unless demands are met. This was done in retaliation to internet activist Aaron Swartz's untimely and suspicious death.

We are entering an era where information, not gold or cash, will be the most valueable commodity. Information that in the future could level the playing field between social classes. Information that is currently being hoarded by private enterprises and governments. And the theory is that those in power want to charge user access for this information. Information that should rightly be free to access by anyone.

We are entering an era where technological advances, if made available to everyone, will bring forth a new social equilibrium and possibly utopia. You can see where those currently in power will do anything to stop that from happening.

False flag operations. Shut down people's ability to take money out of their accounts for awhile. Or disable credit for awhile. There will be mass panic and therefore a justification to lock down whatever they want.

Good thing we all still have our guns though. Because they'll do a lot to stop them from taking away our rights. Oh wait. No they won't.
  • 1
Posted Image

#10 jmfaminoff

jmfaminoff

    Canucks Second-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,831 posts
  • Joined: 21-February 05

Posted 26 January 2013 - 06:20 PM

Not really sure how sifting through private e-mails exactly saves people from a cyber terrorist attack. They aren't very good cyber terrorists if they send information through things they know can be traced and read. I think people more or less have to give in to the fact that e-mails, sites they visit, forums, and everything are probably looked upon by someone. Your ISP can see it, and whoever else does on top of that.

Contrary to popular belief, stuff that 'hides' your IP doesn't hide the fact it's coming from or going to your computer, and your ISP knows about your computer. And not only that, think of other people that use the same type of things you do. You end up inevitably having a target painted on you and probably more liable to be tracked down because they'd want to see why you were trying to hide. They might not be able to see what you're doing since it becomes encrypted, but they can see the encrypted stuff going to you. They'd see the encrypted data being downloaded in roughly the size of a download of a song or something, etc.

In short, just believe that other people read what you say sometimes. And people might know about weird sites you visit.

A lot of people do not know about how signals intel works.
  • 0

#11 Mr. Ambien

Mr. Ambien

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,219 posts
  • Joined: 07-April 03

Posted 26 January 2013 - 06:22 PM

Homeland Security and the Obama administration can frack itself.
  • 2

#12 Tearloch7

Tearloch7

    Canucks Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,872 posts
  • Joined: 15-July 10

Posted 26 January 2013 - 06:22 PM

Give every Internet account a gun .. that is the most sensible resolution ..
  • 0

"To Thine Own Self Be True"

 

"Always tell the Truth. That way, you don’t have to remember what you said"  ~ Mark Twain ~
 


#13 TOMapleLaughs

TOMapleLaughs

    Canucks Hall-of-Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 32,559 posts
  • Joined: 19-September 05

Posted 26 January 2013 - 06:22 PM

Wouldn't surprise me at all if the false flag operation names a group like Anonymous (with the backing of the commies from The Pirate Bay and other torrent sites) as the bad guys.

Then they lock these guys down with one broad stroke. With full public support.
  • 0
Posted Image

#14 Tearloch7

Tearloch7

    Canucks Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,872 posts
  • Joined: 15-July 10

Posted 26 January 2013 - 06:22 PM

Homeland Security and the Obama administration can frack itself.


No .. they are coming to frack you for running away ..
  • 0

"To Thine Own Self Be True"

 

"Always tell the Truth. That way, you don’t have to remember what you said"  ~ Mark Twain ~
 


#15 sedated

sedated

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,728 posts
  • Joined: 08-October 05

Posted 26 January 2013 - 06:29 PM

I don't really mind annonymous and the hacker activists and stuff, but most of the time to 'send a message' to the 'man', they end up hacking websites and sharing data of normal people online and seeing "See? Told you so." While they might get that company in trouble, what about all the personal information they leaked and might've let slip to bad people? That's the part I don't really agree with.
  • 0

#16 jmfaminoff

jmfaminoff

    Canucks Second-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,831 posts
  • Joined: 21-February 05

Posted 26 January 2013 - 06:35 PM

I don't really mind annonymous and the hacker activists and stuff, but most of the time to 'send a message' to the 'man', they end up hacking websites and sharing data of normal people online and seeing "See? Told you so." While they might get that company in trouble, what about all the personal information they leaked and might've let slip to bad people? That's the part I don't really agree with.

You assume that Annonymous was acting in their own interests. They are just patsies being used by the system they despise.

Edited by jmfaminoff, 26 January 2013 - 06:35 PM.

  • 0

#17 PlayStation

PlayStation

    XBox

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,285 posts
  • Joined: 12-April 08

Posted 26 January 2013 - 06:36 PM

Why does government always want to control/interfere and stick their noses where they don't belong? Nobody owns the internet, I'm so sick of these people.
  • 0
Posted Image


"Real Men" :bigblush:

#18 sedated

sedated

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,728 posts
  • Joined: 08-October 05

Posted 26 January 2013 - 06:45 PM

You assume that Annonymous was acting in their own interests. They are just patsies being used by the system they despise.


When Annonymous first came out, it had a very different feel to it. But it obviously changed when people who had other ideals, such as money, seemed to become involved. I find it ridiculous that people would hack places and leak credit card info of normal people and try to play it off as "Showing people not to trust these guys." didn't try to make any money off it.

But to my original point, I just think the government is silly, and people are silly for thinking there's people other than you that know what you do and download or watch online. VPN's don't change the fact they can see encrypted downloads going back to your computer. It doesn't take a rocket science to see encrypted data in the size of songs and games or movies to realize that hey.. they're probably trying to illegally download something. On top of that.. with all the people doing illegal crap WITH those same VPN's.. as I said, you're probably even more at risk for being traced.
  • 0

#19 BuretoMogilny

BuretoMogilny

    Canucks Rookie

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,602 posts
  • Joined: 26-August 12

Posted 26 January 2013 - 06:51 PM

If you look at what the US is doing, it is slowly whittling away at personal freedoms. Take it all at once and you get a revolution but slowly and no one notice and cares.

Many are critisized at being conspiracy theorists etc but look at facts.

1. Airports (they can read your texts, listen to your conversations), see you pretty much naked
2. Listening to your phone calls/emails texts if they think they have a reason
3. Guns (althought I agree but in the context of freedoms here)
4. Now controlling the internet

Controlling information allows you to create the perceptions and views you want, a very dangerous game and the US media is already very good at that, it is only external media sources, twitter other public sources that now allow truth to come out. The media is supposed to be a government watch dog but is now its puppet, so blocking access to real information is extremely dangerous...

One mentioned a false flag and I know what that person is referring to...its quite frightening what you can learn when you think about things and do research. The US is moving closer and closer to a facist society and they don't even know it...
  • 2

#20 ThaBestPlaceOnEarth

ThaBestPlaceOnEarth

    Canucks Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,087 posts
  • Joined: 13-June 07

Posted 26 January 2013 - 08:22 PM

These potential cyber-attacks would all be targeting closed internal networks - power, water, banking, emergency communications - it has nothing to do with the internet. Nobody should be able to hack into those sorts of systems using the same internet as we are for this thread. They need to be looking at where their hardware is sourced from, first of all, and their network security second.
  • 0

Ceterum censeo Chicaginem delendam esse


#21 RUPERTKBD

RUPERTKBD

    Canucks All-Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 18,692 posts
  • Joined: 23-July 04

Posted 26 January 2013 - 08:26 PM

How many are expected to die in a "cyber-9/11"?

Not many in real life, but the death toll in CoD is expected to be staggering...

Edited by RUPERTKBD, 26 January 2013 - 08:26 PM.

  • 0
Orland Kurtenbach and Dennis Kearns had just been torched 8-1 by the Habs, but they still took time to come out to meet us, some fellow BC boys who were playing hockey in Montreal. THAT"S what being a Canuck is!

#22 nucklehead

nucklehead

    Canucks Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,501 posts
  • Joined: 23-March 03

Posted 26 January 2013 - 09:42 PM

oops

Edited by nucklehead, 26 January 2013 - 09:43 PM.

  • 0
biggerabacus_zps5cae10b6.jpg

I got kicked out of the slut walk for trying to bid on the participants.

-BananaMash

#23 nucklehead

nucklehead

    Canucks Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,501 posts
  • Joined: 23-March 03

Posted 26 January 2013 - 09:43 PM

I'm surprised they're not saying the attacks will originate from Canada, lol.

Shhhhh.....
  • 0
biggerabacus_zps5cae10b6.jpg

I got kicked out of the slut walk for trying to bid on the participants.

-BananaMash

#24 hsedin33

hsedin33

    Canucks Third-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,689 posts
  • Joined: 14-February 10

Posted 27 January 2013 - 12:56 AM

Normally I would say glad i dont live in America, but Harper seems to love copying and bending over to everyone's will but the will of Canada, I'd say we are next.
  • 0

#25 Lockout Casualty

Lockout Casualty

    Canucks Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,051 posts
  • Joined: 06-December 12

Posted 27 January 2013 - 10:07 AM

Normally I would say glad i dont live in America, but Harper seems to love copying and bending over to everyone's will but the will of Canada, I'd say we are next.


You're either with us, or with child pornographers. - Vic Halfwit Toews.
  • 0
“Hi Nigel, just a quick note to say that I am always ready to do exactly what is asked but it would have been a great help to know in advance what the strategy was.”

- Carolyn Stewart Olsen, Conservative Senator.

#26 EmployeeoftheMonth

EmployeeoftheMonth

    Canucks All-Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 18,583 posts
  • Joined: 04-September 06

Posted 27 January 2013 - 11:52 AM

At least 7 enraged nerds.

Thousands if Blizzards servers go down.
  • 0
Posted Image
Posted Image

#27 GLASSJAW

GLASSJAW

    LEGENDARY POSER

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 12,983 posts
  • Joined: 21-February 04

Posted 27 January 2013 - 11:54 AM

Thousands if Blizzards servers go down.


when Diablo 3 launched and Blizzard's servers went down, I nearly went down to my local Mac's and killed everyone in it
  • 0

marge.jpg
 
i'm not alone; i'll never be
 


#28 Caboose

Caboose

    Marlies Franchise Player

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,136 posts
  • Joined: 01-September 10

Posted 27 January 2013 - 11:55 AM

Thousands if Blizzards servers go down.


Just imagine the outrage.
  • 0

Posted Image

 

Vintage Canuck's #1 Supporter


#29 EmployeeoftheMonth

EmployeeoftheMonth

    Canucks All-Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 18,583 posts
  • Joined: 04-September 06

Posted 27 January 2013 - 11:59 AM

Just imagine the outrage.


Orgrimmar streets would run green with simulated suicides and digital tears. One Orc will stand above it all and...then they'll release another overpriced expansion that adds samurai pizza cats as playable characters and they'll make all their money back.

Edited by EmployeeoftheMonth, 27 January 2013 - 11:59 AM.

  • 1
Posted Image
Posted Image

#30 Tearloch7

Tearloch7

    Canucks Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,872 posts
  • Joined: 15-July 10

Posted 27 January 2013 - 12:03 PM

Orgrimmar streets would run green with simulated suicides and digital tears. One Orc will stand above it all and...then they'll release another overpriced expansion that adds samurai pizza cats as playable characters and they'll make all their money back.


And all the male Blood Elves will finally come out of the closet, and there shall be peace and harmony throughout Azeroth ..
  • 0

"To Thine Own Self Be True"

 

"Always tell the Truth. That way, you don’t have to remember what you said"  ~ Mark Twain ~
 





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Canucks.com is the official Web site of The Vancouver Canucks. The Vancouver Canucks and Canucks.com are trademarks of The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership.  NHL and the word mark and image of the Stanley Cup are registered trademarks and the NHL Shield and NHL Conference logos are trademarks of the National Hockey League. All NHL logos and marks and NHL team logos and marks as well as all other proprietary materials depicted herein are the property of the NHL and the respective NHL teams and may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of NHL Enterprises, L.P.  Copyright © 2009 The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership and the National Hockey League.  All Rights Reserved.