Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

G-52

new canucks site

Recommended Posts

Does anyone else feel as if the new canucks site could have been made by a 5 year old with crayons? It looks horrible and whoever made it should feel bad.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think they should upgrade their server instead of changing the design of the website. I swear, every now and then, the site will run super fast... But there are times where the site will crash or it'll take forever to even load a page...

PLEASE UPDATE YOUR DAMN SERVER SO YOU CAN HANDLE MORE THAN JUST 1000 PEOPLE AT A TIME.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pigs must be flying in the snow and hell has surely frozen over because I actually agree with the OP.

It looks terrible. Surely this can't be the final draft of the new website because it's awful. People actually worked and got paid to create this 'upgrade' on purpose?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Im talking about the website, not the forum.. The website is not even close to what it was 2 weeks ago. NOT EVEN CLOSE!

Thanks, I think..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, I know. It looks the same. :mellow:

Obviously the site was updated, but it's the same website. Only graphics were changed around. The same components are all still there. It's the same news thing, etc.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, I know. It looks the same. :mellow:

Obviously the site was updated, but it's the same website. Only graphics were changed around. The same components are all still there. It's the same news thing, etc.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think they should upgrade their server instead of changing the design of the website. I swear, every now and then, the site will run super fast... But there are times where the site will crash or it'll take forever to even load a page...

PLEASE UPDATE YOUR DAMN SERVER SO YOU CAN HANDLE MORE THAN JUST 1000 PEOPLE AT A TIME.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

whats difference (from what i can see)

  1. removed container around main site

  2. changed font

  3. layout to add tiles

overall it looks much more minimalistic which is the trend of the web right now (see windows 8 and the microsoft rebrand). i dont mind it but its not my favourite. i dont really like the OTOW background though

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

whats difference (from what i can see)

  1. removed container around main site

  2. changed font

  3. layout to add tiles

overall it looks much more minimalistic which is the trend of the web right now (see windows 8 and the microsoft rebrand). i dont mind it but its not my favourite. i dont really like the OTOW background though

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Im not sure what OTOW is exactly, but the background is one of the worst parts of the new site. BY FAR!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks terrible, and like BB said, makes me laugh that someone was paid to "upgrade" it.

And yeah, #OTOW and the background sucks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I kinda like the new layout but it feels like they're not done, like they're missing a stylesheet or something. The font doesn't fit well, calendar/schedule looks really bland and the background image looks grainy and low quality.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.