Champions of Nothing Posted January 30, 2013 Share Posted January 30, 2013 I have no problem of those books existing in their original form, but I for one would not read them or allow my 9-year old to read them Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
etsen3 Posted January 30, 2013 Share Posted January 30, 2013 The column wasn't defending the language itself, it was complaining about censorship. I also think it would be good to keep the originals, but also have an "edited" version. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Newsflash Posted February 2, 2013 Share Posted February 2, 2013 so it's not "required reading" and the parents can choose NOT to purchase or rent the book. Again, just because YOU might be offended by something, doesn't mean that EVERYONE else should be as well? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zamboni_14 Posted February 2, 2013 Share Posted February 2, 2013 Seriously? First, I'm not offended. I'm using sense here. Second, what exactly is wrong with the censorship standard for books targeted at primary students being different? New copies of these books are not being made for children's books enthusiasts. They are being made for children. Do you think children's shows should be allowed to get away with racism? If these books are being targeted at children, and may end up in the children's section of a library, do you think it's not feasible that new editions of the book not contain racial epithets? We're talking about people under the age of 10 here. The epithets are not central to the stories. Third, as to it not being required reading... that does not mean there shouldn't be standards. If someone tells their kid to go pick a book out of the library, and comes back wondering what a n***er is, you have no problem with that? Do you have a problem with tobacco companies not being allowed to advertise to kids? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dral Posted February 2, 2013 Share Posted February 2, 2013 Say someone has written a period fiction about a time when hate speech was not against the law. This book should be banned even though it is within a historical setting? So I am unable to write a fiction book about a charcter that for his time used "hate speech" (say during the early American Colonial days)? and yet I can go watch a movie where humans are sewn together in a chain to form something resembling a centipede and that is protected as "Free Speech and Free Expression"? I am actually just asking these questions, not implying that hate speech is cool. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EX_Bert_Worshipper Posted February 2, 2013 Share Posted February 2, 2013 Hmmmm.... I am trying to give this a lot of thought, but I think I have to go with my knee-jerk reaction. As a parent, I think that if my kids were exposed to racial slurs, it presents a great opportunity for me to teach my kids that yes, there is racism in the world. I've had converations with my kids about words they hear (e.g. the three letter word starting with "f" to denote sexual preference). I absolutely love it when my oldest child's reaction is a pure stunned look - he is bewildered that people can inject hatred towards others based on race, who they choose to love, gender, etc. So, I guess I believe that there SHOULDN'T be censorship. That's just turning a blind eye. Instead, use it to show kids how racism exists in the world and empower them to (1) not be racist and (2)question why such a thing exists in the first place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Imuzi Posted February 2, 2013 Share Posted February 2, 2013 Huckleberry Finn was a great read those 9 years ago. It was also where I learned the n word and how it was perceived in society. Basically a two for one deal, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dral Posted February 2, 2013 Share Posted February 2, 2013 Hmmmm.... I am trying to give this a lot of thought, but I think I have to go with my knee-jerk reaction. As a parent, I think that if my kids were exposed to racial slurs, it presents a great opportunity for me to teach my kids that yes, there is racism in the world. I've had converations with my kids about words they hear (e.g. the three letter word starting with "f" to denote sexual preference). I absolutely love it when my oldest child's reaction is a pure stunned look - he is bewildered that people can inject hatred towards others based on race, who they choose to love, gender, etc. So, I guess I believe that there SHOULDN'T be censorship. That's just turning a blind eye. Instead, use it to show kids how racism exists in the world and empower them to (1) not be racist and (2)question why such a thing exists in the first place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lockhart Posted February 2, 2013 Share Posted February 2, 2013 I wonder if this little girl has seen Django? People shouldn't try and censor the past. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EX_Bert_Worshipper Posted February 2, 2013 Share Posted February 2, 2013 If only all kids had a parent like you... , Knowing that most probably dont (see the Mom gets tazered in front of her kids thread), do you still hold the same opinion? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.