Understand Posted January 31, 2013 Share Posted January 31, 2013 Just answer this question. Ebbett or Morrison? Forget Schroeder or Morrison. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ilya Mikheyev Posted January 31, 2013 Share Posted January 31, 2013 Morrison vs. Ebbett. Hard one, but I have my doubts that B-Mo will be back as a Canuck, or even in the NHL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bananas Posted January 31, 2013 Share Posted January 31, 2013 Better than Ebbett. Schroeder and/or Kesler can play wing, as well. Although, there's already Malhotra. I would DEFINITELY rather have Morrisson as the 13th guy than Ebbett, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
higgyfan Posted January 31, 2013 Share Posted January 31, 2013 Be here now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ilya Mikheyev Posted January 31, 2013 Share Posted January 31, 2013 11 games with Chicago last year, 0 points. Just recently healthy.. short season.. I just don't see it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Vanderhoek Posted January 31, 2013 Share Posted January 31, 2013 He would not be a good fit in Vancouver and I am sure after his last attempt to make the team both sides will look elsewhere. A few teams he could be a good fit with I think are Buffalo, Tampa Bay, Dallas, New Jersey. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coconuts Posted January 31, 2013 Share Posted January 31, 2013 I loved what he brought to the team in the past, but that ship has sailed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
timberz21 Posted January 31, 2013 Share Posted January 31, 2013 that ship sailed when we chose Schaefer over him Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
InTheCrease Posted January 31, 2013 Share Posted January 31, 2013 that ship sailed when we chose Schaefer over him Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vannuxforlife Posted January 31, 2013 Share Posted January 31, 2013 truth is with the way he played we totally should've given him a deal over Schaeffer. But, given how all that turned out, I don't see any way we bring him back. In a shortened season i would still prefer him over ebbett though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UFCanuck Posted January 31, 2013 Share Posted January 31, 2013 No way, he's not making this team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MoneypuckOverlord Posted January 31, 2013 Share Posted January 31, 2013 Morrison outplayed almost everyone in the training camp and got released. AV mishandled BMO for sure - you can't deny that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sanford Posted February 1, 2013 Share Posted February 1, 2013 No thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DownUndaCanuck Posted February 1, 2013 Share Posted February 1, 2013 We really need youthful centers right now, but BMO will do. Our only faceoff man above 50% is Malhotra, everyone else has shocking percentages and BMO was one of the best in that arena. I say snag him if we don't trade for a quality 40 point-pace guy up the middle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Watermelons Posted February 1, 2013 Share Posted February 1, 2013 I'd love to give him a chance but not at the cost of sending Schroeder down. Don't the Canucks have no roster space already? MG doesn't seem to want to put Ebbet on waivers so Schroeder will be sent down if we sign BMO. No thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TOMapleLaughs Posted February 1, 2013 Share Posted February 1, 2013 Question: Why is CDC, including a lot of veteran posters here, so in love with currently injured or fairly injury-prone vets? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
InTheCrease Posted February 1, 2013 Share Posted February 1, 2013 Question: Why is CDC, including a lot of veteran posters here, so in love with currently injured or fairly injury-prone vets? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dazzle Posted February 2, 2013 Share Posted February 2, 2013 What the hell.... He was offered a 2 way contract.. He wanted a 1 way contract, and to play on the top 6 . he was not released..... we offered him at minimum but a 2 way contract, but he thinks hes a nhler. so he rejected it and signed with Calgary which is fine. Since when do Canucks guarantee top 6 role to players who are on try out contracts? A.V handled it wrong? Are you kidding me? having him on the team, would have cut into Hodgson's developement time also. We did the right thing. Maybe we shouldn't have offered him the tryout in the first place. As far as I know, he's severed his ties with the Canucks, at his own doing. He was offered a 2 way contract.. He wanted a 1 way contract, and to play on the top 6 . He was offered a 2 way contract.. He wanted a 1 way contract, and to play on the top 6 role. the Vancouver Canucks are entitled to offer a player a 2 way contract who is on a tryout contract. don't forget this guys. I know some CAnucks fans here are on serious crack. I'm not even sure how the hell you guys forgot what he said. Unbelievable. It's like you kids follow the Canucks periodically, here and there. WE OFFERED HIM A 2 WAY CONTRACT WHICH HE DECLINED. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smashian Kassian Posted February 2, 2013 Share Posted February 2, 2013 What the hell.... He was offered a 2 way contract.. He wanted a 1 way contract, and to play on the top 6 . he was not released..... we offered him at minimum but a 2 way contract, but he thinks hes a nhler. so he rejected it and signed with Calgary which is fine. Since when do Canucks guarantee top 6 role to players who are on try out contracts? A.V handled it wrong? Are you kidding me? having him on the team, would have cut into Hodgson's developement time also. We did the right thing. Maybe we shouldn't have offered him the tryout in the first place. As far as I know, he's severed his ties with the Canucks, at his own doing. He was offered a 2 way contract.. He wanted a 1 way contract, and to play on the top 6 . He was offered a 2 way contract.. He wanted a 1 way contract, and to play on the top 6 role. the Vancouver Canucks are entitled to offer a player a 2 way contract who is on a tryout contract. don't forget this guys. I know some CAnucks fans here are on serious crack. I'm not even sure how the hell you guys forgot what he said. Unbelievable. It's like you kids follow the Canucks periodically, here and there. WE OFFERED HIM A 2 WAY CONTRACT WHICH HE DECLINED. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stonecoldstevebernier Posted February 2, 2013 Share Posted February 2, 2013 I've always loved Morrison, but he doesn't have a place on this team unfortunately. It's definitely been sad to see his decline though, I remember that big iron man streak he had going when he was with the Canucks.... its a shame that had to snowball into such a rash of injuries. Hope he lands somewhere and gets to end his career on a respectable note. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.