Mr. Ambien Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 Everyone is guilty to a degree once in a while, I try to stay level headed as much as I can but slip up every now and then. I usually feel like a dick and don't feel high on myself at all like some others when I end up saying something dumb like that. I just really found it ironic after pages of her arguing that soto is a disrespectful brat that doesn't know when to keep her mouth shut when being justifiably provoked in a place that has rules to keep order and respect. She maintained soto deserved to get the book thrown at her and thrown in jail... Then BB ultimately lost her cool Penelope style and got a CDC ban for it? Haha wtf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tearloch7 Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 Everyone is guilty to a degree once in a while, I try to stay level headed as much as I can but slip up every now and then. I usually feel like a dick and don't feel high on myself at all like some others when I end up saying something dumb like that. I just really found it ironic after pages of her arguing that soto is a disrespectful brat that doesn't know when to keep her mouth shut when being justifiably provoked in a place that has rules to keep order and respect. She maintained soto deserved to get the book thrown at her and thrown in jail... Then BB ultimately lost her cool Penelope style and got a CDC ban for it? Haha wtf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tearloch7 Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 Delicious irony. Anyways, I have a very hard time following what the last two pages were about, well, besides this crying about BB being banned, and someone arguing with Wetcoaster about something. With no new developments likely to occur on the subject I wonder if it might be time to drop such volatile topic.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wetcoaster Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 Just because i was using this term in relation to a judge does not mean i have to use the legal meaning of the word, unless you are a lawyer and want to argue about the letter of the law. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zamboni_14 Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 Nothing new here folks .. move along .. hopefully this is Z-man's last attempt at mocking someone who is not able to defend themselves .. realistically, that ain't gonna happen .. small minded folk canna escape their destiny .. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tearloch7 Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 Best follow your own, and my advice .. "Nothing new here folks .. move along" .. nothing new in the gloating at a defenseless person .. you either abhor it .. or, you support it openly or through tacit silence .. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inane Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 so if it's nothing new and people should move along... why quote and respond to it to just take a shot at him? There's been more than a few times that I've wanted to say a few things.. but rather than possibly stir up a bee hive, I just kept the remarks to myself. Bottom line, she's gone for a remark that she made that the admin/mods didn't like (according to the post saying why she is banned.) Some will be happy she's gone, others will be upset she's gone. Either way, she's gone. Let's all move on... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buddhas Hand Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 That may well be the most bizarre attempt I have seen to try to avoid being so clearly mistaken, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wetcoaster Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 I do not believe i was mistaken . If i was not clear in my usage of the word i apologise , what Chief Justice Vanderbilt has stated is what i was trying to say. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buddhas Hand Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 Yes you were mistaken and that quote does not assist when read in context. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wetcoaster Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 Are you going to argue with chief justice Vanderbilt ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buddhas Hand Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 Nope, but I can read and comprehend the meaning and put it in context. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stefan Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 Lp Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thad Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 BB was NOT banned for anything she said in this thread .. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buddhas Hand Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 I didn't think so, i was just pointing out the irony of her stance in this thread. If you want to take that as gloating at a defensless poster then go ahead but this entire thread was about judging a girl over one incident. Was it a lifetime ban? if so that is kind of stupid. i agree with hartnells mane, this place is getting ridiculous. Hey Hartnell, do you not have any way to contact her other than cdc? If your that good of friends im sure someone around here could help you get her twitter handle or something Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aladeen Posted February 12, 2013 Share Posted February 12, 2013 wow what happened in this thread I think I left in on page 3 or 4, I don't really want to read through 18 pages of posts anyone want to sum it up for me? So far I have gathered that there was some sort of excriment being thrown around, but if there is anyone with specifics I would appreciate it. Actually you don't have to go into detail at all if there was actually poop being thrown around. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aladeen Posted February 12, 2013 Share Posted February 12, 2013 Not sure if anyone noticed, but she apolagized and she didn't serve any jail time, making this entire thread completely moot. Please change title of thread. http://www.cbsnews.c...0-day-sentence/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inane Posted February 12, 2013 Share Posted February 12, 2013 wow what happened in this thread I think I left in on page 3 or 4, I don't really want to read through 18 pages of posts anyone want to sum it up for me? So far I have gathered that there was some sort of excriment being thrown around, but if there is anyone with specifics I would appreciate it. Actually you don't have to go into detail at all if there was actually poop being thrown around. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wetcoaster Posted February 12, 2013 Share Posted February 12, 2013 'I think this' 'You're wrong' 'But my opinion is this and that. 'You're wrong' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inane Posted February 12, 2013 Share Posted February 12, 2013 Not wrong per se just uninformed and ignorant of the relevant and applicable law, legal principles and legal terminology as it related to the court appearances, citation for and purging of criminal contempt, the criminal charge process,referral to a drug rehab program in lieu of conviction and the differing roles and powers of the two judges involved in Ms. Soto's three appearances in criminal court. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.