Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

Judge throws teen in jail for 30 days for giving him the finger.


nuckin_futz

Recommended Posts

From Florida law:

903.046 Purpose of and criteria for bail determination.

(1) The purpose of a bail determination in criminal proceedings is to ensure the appearance of the criminal defendant at subsequent proceedings and to protect the community against unreasonable danger from the criminal defendant.

http://law.onecle.co...ns/903.046.html

In this case the judge is clearly using increased bail as punishment for misbehaving. Wet, is this in violation of the spirit of bail, as outlined in the law?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Based on my limited observation of the American Judicial system, can anyone share what the actual % of time served versus sentence levied is? .. Lindsay Lohan only ever spends 1/3 of her sentence, so would Penelope be serving 10 days? .. just curious ..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You mean to say doubling the bond amount for an 18 year old making 200/week is not punishment? Her behavior gives no indication of the value she would place on 5,000. Furthermore, there is no indication doubling the amount would have the desired effect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You mean to say doubling the bond amount for an 18 year old making 200/week is not punishment? Her behavior gives no indication of the value she would place on 5,000. Furthermore, there is no indication doubling the amount would have the desired effect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The point of increasing bail is to make the financial penalty more coercive in order that attendance is compelled. That is the basic theory of setting bail amounts.

Remember George Zimmerman who is accused of murdering Trayvon Martin. He was released on an initial bond of $150,000 that was revoked and replaced with a new bond of $1 million?

http://www.cnn.com/2...a-teen-shooting

Link to comment
Share on other sites

She never interrupted the court's process, she was standing at the podium respectfully waiting for him to be finished, regardless of prior, ambiguous "warning". There was no obvious indicators he was done until he condescendingly dismissed her.

Are you under the impression she would have said or done the things she did had the judge not antagonised her?

Logic says no.

What say you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

She never interrupted the court's process, she was standing at the podium respectfully waiting for him to be finished, regardless of prior, ambiguous "warning". There was no obvious indicators he was done until he condescendingly dismissed her.

Are you under the impression she would have said or done the things she did had the judge not antagonised her?

Logic says no.

What say you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

She never interrupted the court's process, she was standing at the podium respectfully waiting for him to be finished, regardless of prior, ambiguous "warning". There was no obvious indicators he was done until he condescendingly dismissed her.

Are you under the impression she would have said or done the things she did had the judge not antagonised her?

Logic says no.

What say you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...