Jump to content

Welcome to canucks.com Vancouver Canucks homepage

Photo

Canucks-Wings(Proposal)


  • Please log in to reply
37 replies to this topic

#31 Lockhart

Lockhart

    Canucks Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,224 posts
  • Joined: 30-July 09

Posted 06 February 2013 - 11:26 AM

If Gillis really wanted Tootoo I'm sure we would have signed him when he was a UFA or at least had a few rumours of it.

  • 0

#32 Mookie Wilson

Mookie Wilson

    Canucks Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,007 posts
  • Joined: 13-January 09

Posted 06 February 2013 - 11:28 AM

Ballard is overpaid, but our defense would have inferior depth and quality were he lost. If he's traded, he'd have to be replaced.

And if he is traded, I sure hope it's to address a greater need than another bottom-6 winger.
  • 0

#33 elvis15

elvis15

    Canucks All-Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 19,039 posts
  • Joined: 27-February 07

Posted 06 February 2013 - 11:29 AM

Tootoo would destroy volpattia and weise in a fight. But I doubt Detroit would say yes to the trade cause Fans go crazy for him right now. and i doubt we will win the cup this year, unless we make some big changes to get playoff performers.



Yes, he clearly destroyed him.

And in case you didn't pick it up, that was sarcasm as it was pretty even until Tootoo landed the extra punches at the end. He clearly did not destroy him.
  • 0
Posted ImagePosted Image

#34 Mookie Wilson

Mookie Wilson

    Canucks Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,007 posts
  • Joined: 13-January 09

Posted 06 February 2013 - 11:43 AM



Yes, he clearly destroyed him.

And in case you didn't pick it up, that was sarcasm as it was pretty even until Tootoo landed the extra punches at the end. He clearly did not destroy him.


94% of voters on Hockey Fights scored that fight in favour of Tootoo.
  • 0

#35 Smashian Kassian

Smashian Kassian

    Canucks Franchise Player

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,294 posts
  • Joined: 10-June 10

Posted 06 February 2013 - 04:46 PM

haha and then when he played he kicked our a**.


There you go, Vandy could draw in just as easily.
  • 0

zackass.png


#36 Raymond Ballard and a 1st

Raymond Ballard and a 1st

    Comets Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 152 posts
  • Joined: 30-August 12

Posted 06 February 2013 - 06:29 PM

Ballard and Tanev are doing well, leave it that way..
  • 0

#37 allkill326

allkill326

    Canucks Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,270 posts
  • Joined: 30-May 12

Posted 06 February 2013 - 06:37 PM

Value is fair, but we need Ballard as our defenceman for now. If we have a good defenceman to replace Ballard, we might consider trading him for Tootoo.
  • 0
Posted Image

#38 bossram

bossram

    Canucks Second-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,943 posts
  • Joined: 13-August 10

Posted 06 February 2013 - 11:58 PM

Unless we get a better defenceman back and with Ballard playing well, we really can't afford to trade him. Our D-depth is atrocious after the top-six.

I don't think Tootoo is the player we need either.
  • 0
What is the deal with Mike Gillis, it always seems like he's sweating...




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Canucks.com is the official Web site of The Vancouver Canucks. The Vancouver Canucks and Canucks.com are trademarks of The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership.  NHL and the word mark and image of the Stanley Cup are registered trademarks and the NHL Shield and NHL Conference logos are trademarks of the National Hockey League. All NHL logos and marks and NHL team logos and marks as well as all other proprietary materials depicted herein are the property of the NHL and the respective NHL teams and may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of NHL Enterprises, L.P.  Copyright © 2009 The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership and the National Hockey League.  All Rights Reserved.