rfus88 Posted February 8, 2013 Share Posted February 8, 2013 Please do show the video or quote where Luo specifically asked for a trade? Once again, more mindless drivel from someone swallowing the media-driven garbage hook, line and sinker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rfus88 Posted February 8, 2013 Share Posted February 8, 2013 he said if they asked him to waive his NTC then he would he didn't say "I want to be traded" just like nobody said "Schneider is officially our #1 starter" why is this so hard for Lu-haters to get, instead they just keep making up crap Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EmployeeoftheMonth Posted February 8, 2013 Share Posted February 8, 2013 See above post for wanting to be traded, gillis quoted it. You don't sign CS to that type of contract if he's your backup, especially with Luongos contract. How is this so hard to get? does it have to be said if its obviously implied, jeez you love luongo so much at least realize they're trying to defend his honour a little by not coming right out with it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Primus099 Posted February 8, 2013 Share Posted February 8, 2013 See above post for wanting to be traded, gillis quoted it. You don't sign CS to that type of contract if he's your backup, especially with Luongos contract. How is this so hard to get? does it have to be said if its obviously implied, jeez you love luongo so much at least realize they're trying to defend his honour a little by not coming right out with it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rfus88 Posted February 8, 2013 Share Posted February 8, 2013 I like both goalies, but the Luongo hate is beyond retarded if they wanted to trade him as badly as you're implying, then they would have traded him. especially if they were set on Schneider being the starter, and they sure as hell would not have given Luongo 4 starts in a row. And a 3 year deal for someone who they're supposedly set on being the starter and being the future of the canucks goaltending doesn't add up, why only 3 years why not 5 or 6? Cause they aren't ready to 100% commit to him yet just like Montreal with Subban. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rfus88 Posted February 8, 2013 Share Posted February 8, 2013 So you're confirming that all this "he asked for a trade" crap is purely an assumption. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Primus099 Posted February 8, 2013 Share Posted February 8, 2013 Don't hate Loungo but his time here is done. It's fairly obvious they've been trying to move Loungo but the right deal isn't in place. I expect him to moved by the trade deadline or in the summer when their return is a greater value. Gillis didn't give Luongo 4 starts, AV did. Why are you even looking at the years in the contract when it's the amount that designates him as a starter.They wouldn't invest that much in two goalies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rfus88 Posted February 8, 2013 Share Posted February 8, 2013 you don't think Gillis has any input in who starts? lol Gillis said it himself we're here to win games not worry about peoples feelings, and Luongo is the better goaltender right now that's why he got those starts. Schneider is playing well tonight too. They aren't going to make a trade this season, why would they give up the luxury of having 2 great goalies. It will be done after the season Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bertuzzi Babe Posted February 8, 2013 Share Posted February 8, 2013 Quote from Gillis on 1040 that Luongo approached him in the summer about exploring options for him, dig it up yourself . More mindless drivel from a more informed fan than yourself Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EmployeeoftheMonth Posted February 8, 2013 Share Posted February 8, 2013 Implied meaning that CS is number one and this doesn't need to be verbally spoken , it was put in motion with his contract. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rfus88 Posted February 8, 2013 Share Posted February 8, 2013 Video? Direct quote? Soundbite? Mmm hmm...didn't think you'd provide one. Your claim, the onus is on you to back it up. You'd think you'd know the drill on CDC by now. ...more informed....... Here you go , I'll hold your damn hand, about 6 mins in. I thought this was common knowledge http://www.teamradio.ca/news/mike-gillis-on-canucks-goaltending-and-kesler-health/ Ohhh, man..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EmployeeoftheMonth Posted February 8, 2013 Share Posted February 8, 2013 Video? Direct quote? Soundbite? Mmm hmm...didn't think you'd provide one. Your claim, the onus is on you to back it up. You'd think you'd know the drill on CDC by now. ...more informed....... Ohhh, man..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rfus88 Posted February 8, 2013 Share Posted February 8, 2013 This guys funny. I mean what kind of brain child talks about a quote and then rambles off something that didn't happen and then refuse to back it up. The best part is it still doesn't say anything about Luongo asking for a trade. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EmployeeoftheMonth Posted February 8, 2013 Share Posted February 8, 2013 http://www.teamradio...-kesler-health/ Here 6 mins in . You guys are unbelievable Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bertuzzi Babe Posted February 8, 2013 Share Posted February 8, 2013 This guys funny. I mean what kind of brain child talks about a quote and then rambles off something that didn't happen and then refuse to back it up. The best part is it still doesn't say anything about Luongo asking for a trade. Of course they're going to talk about options if Luongo has said he would be willing to waive his NTC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rfus88 Posted February 8, 2013 Share Posted February 8, 2013 Ok please enlighten me if I keep ignoring whats being said. You wont even listen to the interview I posted where it backs up what I just said. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rfus88 Posted February 8, 2013 Share Posted February 8, 2013 This guys funny. I mean what kind of brain child talks about a quote and then rambles off something that didn't happen and then refuse to back it up. The best part is it still doesn't say anything about Luongo asking for a trade. Of course they're going to talk about options if Luongo has said he would be willing to waive his NTC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EmployeeoftheMonth Posted February 8, 2013 Share Posted February 8, 2013 `Roberto requested us have us look at options for him`. Luongo came to them, are you that dense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rfus88 Posted February 8, 2013 Share Posted February 8, 2013 Now when Luongo said he would waive his no trade clause wouldn't you automatically think that a conversation about options would happen? However just because a conversation about options happens it doesn't mean Luongo is asking to be traded. You're putting emphasis on something that's not there. I understand what you're saying and I understand what you want to be true but you should stop trying to prove something with assumptions. No matter how many times you say this you don't have enough parts of the equation to fit your belief. Kind of like how you assumed I didn't listen to the interview. I did and I listened to it when it first happened. You didn't find some hidden gem of information you just showed how you went wrong. It doesn't mean you are wrong but there is nothing out there yet that says Luongo asked for a trade. As least with CoHo we've got his weirdo agents conflicting comments. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bertuzzi Babe Posted February 8, 2013 Share Posted February 8, 2013 Now when Luongo said he would waive his no trade clause wouldn't you automatically think that a conversation about options would happen? However just because a conversation about options happens it doesn't mean Luongo is asking to be traded. You're putting emphasis on something that's not there. I understand what you're saying and I understand what you want to be true but you should stop trying to prove something with assumptions. No matter how many times you say this you don't have enough parts of the equation to fit your belief. Kind of like how you assumed I didn't listen to the interview. I did and I listened to it when it first happened. You didn't find some hidden gem of information you just showed how you went wrong. It doesn't mean you are wrong but there is nothing out there yet that says Luongo asked for a trade. As least with CoHo we've got his weirdo agents conflicting comments. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.