Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Canouver

If we had to trade one Sedin

76 posts in this topic

Henrik. Just so we can give the "C" to Schneider.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's simply impossible to make that decision.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

hypothetically?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

this COULD be a fun thread if we just treated it as "what would it take for us to have to trade one sedin" end of the world shizz

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Daniel's sniper ability is hard to trade away, but

Henrik,

Centre's are more valuable to a team,

Henrik is captain,

He's a hitting machine right now

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We might need to trade them when it gets close to the end of their contract. Think of players who have gone through this. Matt's Sundin and other players who have been traded near there contract end. It's just a simple Question Danny or Henrik. From over the years and what you have seen.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No even going to consider putting any effort into beginning to think about that particular idea.

In short: No. niether. Bad!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Canuck Nation would rather commit mass Seppuku before having to make this decision!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If something that stupid really happened, I would cheer for a differen't team.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Daniel. He would fetch a higher return than Henrik (because goals are perceived to be more valuable than assists) and we can always train someone to receive Henrik's extraordinary passes.

Also...what about this guy:

photo-61749.jpg

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Daniel. He would fetch a higher return than Henrik (because goals are perceived to be more valuable than assists) and we can always train someone to receive Henrik's extraordinary passes.

Also...what about this guy:

photo-61749.jpg

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The man said "if" so go with it, don't just shoot him down for posting an unlikely hypothetical situation.

We trade Daniel, simple. The Canucks are thin at center and stacked on the wing, we have plenty of guys who can play top line minutes and Daniel only plays around 18 minutes a game anyway. If we lost Henrik this team would be in trouble unless of course we trade for a centerman. Right now we have Lapierre, Malhotra (both of whom contribute next to nothing offensively), Schroeder (still very unproven and yet to score his first NHL goal) and Kesler (who may not return to the same level he once was).

So simply, we have Burrows, Raymond, Kassian, Booth, Hansen, Jensen and Higgins who can play on the wing. There's a much bigger drop-off at the center position.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Henrik duh. Daniel is so much better looking

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They're not going to be traded. But a discussion about their performance the last 1,5 years is a good thing because supposed elite players should be better!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They're not going to be traded. But a discussion about their performance the last 1,5 years is a good thing because supposed elite players should be better!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We might need to trade them when it gets close to the end of their contract. Think of players who have gone through this. Matt's Sundin and other players who have been traded near there contract end. It's just a simple Question Danny or Henrik. From over the years and what you have seen.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.