Jump to content

Welcome to canucks.com Vancouver Canucks homepage

Photo
* * * - - 5 votes

Jordan Schroeder = Cliff Ronning?


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
100 replies to this topic

#91 Ray_Cathode

Ray_Cathode

    Canucks Second-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,880 posts
  • Joined: 07-September 07

Posted 29 March 2013 - 08:38 AM

Anyone see any similarities in the way Jordan Schroeder plays compared to Cliff Ronning?


No. The only thing they have in common is in playing centre and being small. Schroeder is bigger than Ronning but nowhere near as talented.

#92 mistaaT

mistaaT

    K-Wing Regular

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 27 posts
  • Joined: 17-November 08

Posted 29 March 2013 - 10:40 AM

My first memory of the Canucks is going to a game and watching Ronning leave the box straight to scoring on a breakaway. Fabulous introduction to a great player, and an even better team.

Don't for see Schroeder providing that kind of impact anytime soon.....so no, no I don't see Schroeder = Ronning.

#93 ChenWei91

ChenWei91

    Canucks Third-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,404 posts
  • Joined: 02-July 08

Posted 29 March 2013 - 10:42 AM

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

(>'-')>Posted Image<('-'<)


#94 Hugemanskost

Hugemanskost

    Canucks Third-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,382 posts
  • Joined: 31-December 09

Posted 29 March 2013 - 10:55 AM

Ronning at 22... 25 points in 42 games as a rookie with the Blues.

Schroeder at 22... 9 points in 29 games as a rookie (so far).

Hard to compare 2 different eras, but, I'd have to say Ronning gets the edge here. If Schroeder plays 1100+ games and score 870 odd points, man, that would be stoopid good!

I have been of the opinion that Schroeder will be that first forward call-up for the Canucks for his career, unless he is moved. My opinion is changing. When given the opportunity, especially recently with Hansen and MayRay, he has looked good, even dangerous, at times. He's responsible defensively, offensively talented, but he aint no Cliffy!

webkit-fake-url://D8829558-F65F-49B9-9829-A7DFC7F2E6E4/application.pdf


:towel: :canucks:


#95 dorrcoq

dorrcoq

    Canucks Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,037 posts
  • Joined: 12-September 05

Posted 29 March 2013 - 10:18 PM

I compared Schroeder to a more physical, two-way version of Patrick Kane.


Some pretty funny stuff right there

#96 dorrcoq

dorrcoq

    Canucks Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,037 posts
  • Joined: 12-September 05

Posted 29 March 2013 - 10:21 PM

I think Jordan will be a 70 point guy by time hes 24 years old.


Maybe in the Dutch league Weiss played in during the lockout.

#97 Bring_Back_Bertuzzi

Bring_Back_Bertuzzi

    Comets Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 965 posts
  • Joined: 18-February 13

Posted 30 March 2013 - 08:06 AM

not yet

luo_sig_with_words.jpg


#98 Boudrias

Boudrias

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,827 posts
  • Joined: 14-January 04

Posted 30 March 2013 - 08:17 AM

Ronning at 22... 25 points in 42 games as a rookie with the Blues.

Schroeder at 22... 9 points in 29 games as a rookie (so far).

Hard to compare 2 different eras, but, I'd have to say Ronning gets the edge here. If Schroeder plays 1100+ games and score 870 odd points, man, that would be stoopid good!

I have been of the opinion that Schroeder will be that first forward call-up for the Canucks for his career, unless he is moved. My opinion is changing. When given the opportunity, especially recently with Hansen and MayRay, he has looked good, even dangerous, at times. He's responsible defensively, offensively talented, but he aint no Cliffy!

My comment would be that the eras were significantly different. The NHL today is a far more competitive game. All the players are faster, better coached and physically bigger. That said the hooking and holding back in Cliffy's day was accepted practise.

Tough to compare but my take is that Ronning wins hands down. Schroeder has definte potential.

#99 VanIsleNuckFan

VanIsleNuckFan

    Canucks Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,707 posts
  • Joined: 31-May 06

Posted 30 March 2013 - 10:14 AM

I was taught you can't compare one person to another. But besides height its too early to tell what kind of career Schroeder will have.


Then how can you tell anyone apart?? I think you're lucky there's no blind people in your family

#100 Canucks_Hockey_101

Canucks_Hockey_101

    Canucks Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,195 posts
  • Joined: 05-November 12

Posted 30 March 2013 - 11:11 AM

Mason Raymond = Pavel Bure?

Am I doing this right?


He does look a little like him...

#101 CmdrAdama

CmdrAdama

    Comets Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 485 posts
  • Joined: 03-July 06

Posted 31 March 2013 - 08:36 AM

Ronning would have found a way to get at least 1 goal against Edmonton in that game last night...




Canucks.com is the official Web site of The Vancouver Canucks. The Vancouver Canucks and Canucks.com are trademarks of The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership.  NHL and the word mark and image of the Stanley Cup are registered trademarks and the NHL Shield and NHL Conference logos are trademarks of the National Hockey League. All NHL logos and marks and NHL team logos and marks as well as all other proprietary materials depicted herein are the property of the NHL and the respective NHL teams and may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of NHL Enterprises, L.P.  Copyright © 2009 The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership and the National Hockey League.  All Rights Reserved.