canacks1970 Posted February 13, 2013 Share Posted February 13, 2013 I haven't really been that high on Schoeder because of his size but he is starting to make me a believer. Whether he can handle the rough going in the playoffs remains to be seen. When Kesler and Booth return we have cap problems as well as a glut of players. Everyone can't have a spot right now so Schroeder would be the logical player to send to the Wolves.....at least until a trade changes the landscape. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elvis15 Posted February 13, 2013 Share Posted February 13, 2013 I don't beleive they have a cap issue this year Bluesman. Its still at 70.2 million. Its next year we have to worry about when it drops to 64.3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
supermanbieksa Posted February 13, 2013 Share Posted February 13, 2013 There is no reason to send him back down. He has proven everyone he's good enough to play with the big boys. If it doesn't work keeping him at the centre spot, put him on Keslers wing, 2nd line needs a playmaker and Shroeder could be the solution. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hockeyville88 Posted February 13, 2013 Share Posted February 13, 2013 Hosea Cheung @hosea24hours "If Jordan (Schroeder) continues to play well, he's not going anywhere" - Gillis on Team 1040. #canucks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Honky Cat Posted February 14, 2013 Share Posted February 14, 2013 Eventually,you have to stand by your draft picks and let them develop..there's going to be ups and downs with any rookie....JS has already proven that he's ready for the NHL,what's the upside of sending him back to the AHL and bringing him back for the playoffs? We may lose Ebbett,..but so be it.If we do get deep into the playoffs and injuries occur,I'd rather have a Jordan Schroeder with NHL experience than with minor league. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hugemanskost Posted February 14, 2013 Share Posted February 14, 2013 I feel people are jumping too quickly to praise Schroeder. He has 4 points in 10 games. Over 82 games that's 33 points. Whoopdy doo! This is what a first round pick gets us? It's way too early to say Schroeder's going to be a bomb or a star. When Kes and Booth get back, send Schroeder back to Chicago (cuz he doesn't have to clear waivers) and let him apply what he learned in The Show then come back next year and compete for a permanent spot on the big club. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Erik Karlsson Posted February 14, 2013 Share Posted February 14, 2013 I feel people are jumping too quickly to praise Schroeder. He has 4 points in 10 games. Over 82 games that's 33 points. Whoopdy doo! This is what a first round pick gets us? It's way too early to say Schroeder's going to be a bomb or a star. When Kes and Booth get back, send Schroeder back to Chicago (cuz he doesn't have to clear waivers) and let him apply what he learned in The Show then come back next year and compete for a permanent spot on the big club. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hugemanskost Posted February 14, 2013 Share Posted February 14, 2013 Why would we send him down, he hasn't had a goal scored on him and he makes something happen every time he touches the puck. His first game shouldn't even count because of how nervous he was, he looks better every game and rarely makes a mistake. The points will come, he was playing a 3rd line role the first couple games anyways, 33 points isn't bad for a rookie playing the 3rd line who is solid defensively. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanucksJay Posted February 14, 2013 Share Posted February 14, 2013 I would send him down because he is waiver eligible and because he will play 1st line minutes with the Wolves. The only other waiver exempt player the Canucks have on the roster is Tanev and he isn't going anywhere. If the club truly believe in the likes of Vopatti, Weise, Barker and Alberts, they won't waive them when Kes and Booth return. Why would they want to lose an asset? It's JShray and / or Tanev going down, unless they want to risk losing a depth player. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hugemanskost Posted February 14, 2013 Share Posted February 14, 2013 couldnt they waive ebbett? do we need to waive another player? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Honky Cat Posted February 14, 2013 Share Posted February 14, 2013 I feel people are jumping too quickly to praise Schroeder. He has 4 points in 10 games. Over 82 games that's 33 points. Whoopdy doo! This is what a first round pick gets us? It's way too early to say Schroeder's going to be a bomb or a star. When Kes and Booth get back, send Schroeder back to Chicago (cuz he doesn't have to clear waivers) and let him apply what he learned in The Show then come back next year and compete for a permanent spot on the big club. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.