vcr1970 Posted February 17, 2013 Share Posted February 17, 2013 It seems most people on here are only in favor of a trade that makes the Canucks better if its a completely one-sided robbery of a trade on the Canucks' side. So I've got a question for everyone: Would you rather make a trade that forfeits part of the future to give the team a much better shot of winning the cup in the next year or two, or Would you rather be a team that stands pat. An upper echelon team that has a mediocre chance of winning the cup for years to come but refuses to make an impact trade? I'd rather we go all in and go for it, but what do you think? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghostsof1915 Posted February 17, 2013 Share Posted February 17, 2013 Tough question because it entirely depends on what we're giving up, and what we are getting back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RyanKeslord17 Posted February 17, 2013 Share Posted February 17, 2013 mediocre chance of winning the cup for years to come Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vcr1970 Posted February 17, 2013 Author Share Posted February 17, 2013 Wow, so you'd rather be the Nashville Predators than the Pittsburgh Penguins or Detroit Red Wings Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nucks fan555555 Posted February 17, 2013 Share Posted February 17, 2013 Wow, so you'd rather be the Nashville Predators than the Pittsburgh Penguins or Detroit Red Wings Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xur Posted February 17, 2013 Share Posted February 17, 2013 Yeah I dont see a need for different players to be successful for the next couple seasons, just new game plans. So I say trade for prospects and picks. Sedin's are now the "old vets" at 32 so prospects will have lots of time to develop before we need them to take over. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pwnstar Posted February 17, 2013 Share Posted February 17, 2013 Wow, so you'd rather be the Nashville Predators than the Pittsburgh Penguins or Detroit Red Wings Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MoneypuckOverlord Posted February 17, 2013 Share Posted February 17, 2013 It paid off for the kings. The price of Dustin Penner, Jeff Carter and Mike Richards, costed them 2 1st round picks, and 2 1st round picked player in Brayden Schenn Culten Teubert. I take a 1 Stanley cup if it costed is 5 1st round picks. But what are the players coming back is the question. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Primus099 Posted February 17, 2013 Share Posted February 17, 2013 if trading Schnedier significantly improves the current team in front of Luongo with how well he's playing then do it. if not then trade Luongo and build for the future Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted February 17, 2013 Share Posted February 17, 2013 if trading Schnedier significantly improves the current team in front of Luongo with how well he's playing then do it. if not then trade Luongo and build for the future Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pwnstar Posted February 17, 2013 Share Posted February 17, 2013 i would make a big trade, but we aren't doing bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AppleJack Posted February 18, 2013 Share Posted February 18, 2013 I would do it I would make the big trade (within reason certain players should be untouchable) I would do whatever it takes for Vancouver to Finally win the cup. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pwnstar Posted February 18, 2013 Share Posted February 18, 2013 if trading Schnedier significantly improves the current team in front of Luongo with how well he's playing then do it. if not then trade Luongo and build for the future Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.