Jump to content

Welcome to canucks.com Vancouver Canucks homepage

Photo
- - - - -

Predators just got screwed by a terrible call, PIC inside


  • Please log in to reply
46 replies to this topic

#1 AriGold

AriGold

    Hairy Old

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,525 posts
  • Joined: 09-June 12

Posted 18 February 2013 - 02:12 PM

So Duchene got a lead pass and the puck was catching up with him then he breaks in on a breakaway and scores..

Trots was losing his mind on the refs and couldn't believe it actually happened,

Question, how does this happen ? The linesman was right on the line..

Posted Image
  • 1

                                                 Hockey-Canada-Logo__2__large.png


#2 Durl Dixsun

Durl Dixsun

    Canucks Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,243 posts
  • Joined: 02-November 10

Posted 18 February 2013 - 02:15 PM


Edited by RatedR, 18 February 2013 - 02:16 PM.

  • 4

Posted Image


#3 SkeeterHansen

SkeeterHansen

    Canucks Third-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,142 posts
  • Joined: 24-May 11

Posted 18 February 2013 - 02:16 PM

BETTMAN WANTS COLORADO TO WIN THE NORTHWEST DIVISION :frantic: CONSPIRACYYYYYYYY.


In seriousness, chalk it up to human error. Blatant, awful, human error. But human error all the same.

Edited by MaximYapierre, 18 February 2013 - 02:24 PM.

  • 0

/=S=/


#4 AriGold

AriGold

    Hairy Old

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,525 posts
  • Joined: 09-June 12

Posted 18 February 2013 - 02:22 PM


Huh ? That wasn't the play for the Duchene goal ? Isn't thre a thread on the Raymond goal ?
  • 0

                                                 Hockey-Canada-Logo__2__large.png


#5 avelanch

avelanch

    Canucks Hall-of-Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 34,538 posts
  • Joined: 23-March 07

Posted 18 February 2013 - 02:28 PM

the linesman blinked, maybe?
  • 0

#6 canucklax

canucklax

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,869 posts
  • Joined: 08-July 09

Posted 18 February 2013 - 02:33 PM

Gotta agree with the other posters, linesman fault on that one, maybe he blinked or something. I'm just surprised none of the other officials saw something that obvious and didn't speak up afterwards. I'd say use video review, but if review was to be used on every offside call, the games would be 9 hours long
  • 0

6xFRVi3.png

Credit to bananamash for the sig. Credit to torts for being stubborn

Bring Back the Totems!
NHLSL Winnipeg Jets


#7 Froggy Fresh

Froggy Fresh

    Canucks Rookie

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,929 posts
  • Joined: 05-June 09

Posted 18 February 2013 - 02:42 PM

That looks pretty bad. I didn't think it could get any worse than that Breire one in the playoffs, but that looks ridiculous. I gotta see an actual replay of that.

Here's the Briere one for anyone who might have forgotten :



Here's a replay. Not the best one, but it's better than nothing for now I guess. I'll post a better one if I find it.



Looks like even Duchene thought it was offside. Wow.

HD replay :


Edited by Froggy Fresh, 18 February 2013 - 03:21 PM.

  • 0

Posted Image


Credit to (>'-')> for the amazing sig!


#8 goalie13

goalie13

    Osgoodian One

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,144 posts
  • Joined: 30-April 07

Posted 18 February 2013 - 02:57 PM

Looks like even Duchene thought it was offside. Wow.


It looked like everyone thought it was offside and basically stopped playing.

It kind of reminded me of plays in football where everyone thinks the guy with the ball is down except the guy with the ball and the refs and he keeps on running.
  • 0
Posted Image

#9 Primus099

Primus099

    Canucks Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,009 posts
  • Joined: 17-October 12

Posted 18 February 2013 - 03:25 PM

haha wow....that's REALLY bad
  • 0

#10 Dion Phaneuf

Dion Phaneuf

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,743 posts
  • Joined: 05-May 12

Posted 18 February 2013 - 03:35 PM

He's like 10 feet offside. :lol:
  • 0

gallery_47851_23_84084.png

medium.png - CDCGML 483288048.png - EHL medium.png - STHS medium.png - CDCFL


#11 Down by the River

Down by the River

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,982 posts
  • Joined: 29-March 09

Posted 18 February 2013 - 03:37 PM

It took Duchene about 30 feet to realize the play wasn't called offside.
  • 0

OMG we could've had McKeown!

I think Virtanen was a terrible pick given that he's out for 6 months which will hinder his development. You don't pick someone at #6 under that circumstance, along with the fact that he was given a 3/5 IQ (aka he's dumb). 

God dammit Benning. WHY VIRTANEN? Terrible move.

Down by the River - Crosby, Stills, Nash, and Young.


#12 Primus099

Primus099

    Canucks Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,009 posts
  • Joined: 17-October 12

Posted 18 February 2013 - 03:37 PM

game just ended, 6-5 Colorado. That call literally was the difference
  • 0

#13 Tystick

Tystick

    Canucks Rookie

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,597 posts
  • Joined: 21-February 12

Posted 18 February 2013 - 03:42 PM

We can look at it as the refs are inconsistent, but the truth is the refs are not the same people each game.
So some games you will get veterans, where as other games you will rookies.
There is error because it's such a fast paced game and they are out there trying to watch everything happening.
It's easy for us to critique because we can look at all the photographic evidence and analyse everything at our own pace, and that is why I feel lots more should be able to be reviewed upstairs. They can't catch everything.

But in all honestly, they do a very good job about 80% of the time.

Just remember, they are only human.

Edited by Tystick, 18 February 2013 - 03:44 PM.

  • 1
Posted Image

#14 Down by the River

Down by the River

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,982 posts
  • Joined: 29-March 09

Posted 18 February 2013 - 03:47 PM

Maybe at least many of the CDCers out there can now understand that bad calls don't just happen to the Canucks. Great teams overcome the bad calls.

Chicago has played 15 games without a regulation loss, yet I'm sure they've seen at least one or two bad calls go their way so far this season.
  • 0

OMG we could've had McKeown!

I think Virtanen was a terrible pick given that he's out for 6 months which will hinder his development. You don't pick someone at #6 under that circumstance, along with the fact that he was given a 3/5 IQ (aka he's dumb). 

God dammit Benning. WHY VIRTANEN? Terrible move.

Down by the River - Crosby, Stills, Nash, and Young.


#15 stexx

stexx

    Canucks Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,266 posts
  • Joined: 19-April 08

Posted 18 February 2013 - 03:48 PM

whats bad about it is everyone knows its a mistake, the refs know it, the linesman know it but the rules do not let them review it and call the goal off. That is what is wrong with the situation.

just like in the NFL if it is a scoring play it automatically gets reviewed should be painfully obvious by now that is the way to go.

Edited by stexx, 18 February 2013 - 03:49 PM.

  • 2

#16 DeNiro

DeNiro

    Canucks Hall-of-Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 23,291 posts
  • Joined: 22-April 08

Posted 18 February 2013 - 03:58 PM

At least if this many bad calls happen to enough teams, maybe there will finally be a call for action.

This type of officiating is just disgracing the game. These refs are about as bad as the replacement refs were in the NFL.
  • 0

Posted Image


"Dream until the dream come true"


#17 *vInTaGe*

*vInTaGe*

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,408 posts
  • Joined: 30-November 06

Posted 18 February 2013 - 03:59 PM

Wow that was bad, it's like everybody except the linesman knew it was offside.
  • 0

Posted Image


#18 hockeyville88

hockeyville88

    Canucks Hall-of-Famer

  • Super Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 26,067 posts
  • Joined: 24-October 06

Posted 18 February 2013 - 04:01 PM

Ugh that's ridiculous. It's not even close to being onside.
  • 0
Posted Image
Sig credit: GoaltenderInterference. Thanks!

#19 -Vintage Canuck-

-Vintage Canuck-

    Canucks Hall-of-Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 75,123 posts
  • Joined: 24-May 10

Posted 18 February 2013 - 04:04 PM

Wow, and the Predators lost by 1 goal!
  • 0

307mg00.jpg


#20 Raiun

Raiun

    Canucks Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,112 posts
  • Joined: 23-February 12

Posted 18 February 2013 - 04:52 PM

Really bad missed call. Obviously they need to expand the rules on what types of goals are reviewable, that was brutal...
  • 0

#21 poetica

poetica

    Canucks Second-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,394 posts
  • Joined: 09-June 11

Posted 18 February 2013 - 05:06 PM

Just posted about that in another thread.... Absolutely ridiculous!

The reffing this entire season seems to be substandard. While refs are only human and will always make mistakes, it seems there's a majorly blown calls almost every game, and some games with multiple blown calls. The NHL needs to take a serious look at their refs and make sure they do a better job training, supervising, and holding them accountable. And they need to make all goals reviewable so these kinds of bogus on-ice calls aren't deciding games.

Edited by poetica, 18 February 2013 - 05:06 PM.

  • 0
Go, Canucks, Go!
Every single one of them.

Thanks for the memories, Luo! :'(

#22 Edlerberry

Edlerberry

    Canucks Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,245 posts
  • Joined: 01-February 12

Posted 18 February 2013 - 05:19 PM

The refs have been ESPESCIALLY bad this year. WOW

I wonder if this is the leagues' way of "getting the NHLPA back"... because people i know who dont even follow hockey are making better calls.

Also, it should all be video reviewable. The refs shouldn't be trying to defend themselves when they make a bad call, rather they should fix the call so the game plays the way it was intended. It should all be video reviewable, and each team should get a set number of call challenges or something. Its absolutely insanity.
  • 0
July 7-2013

Toronto will take a step back next year.
Feel free to quote me.


July 8-2013

Wow I can't believe peoples replies...
Im done here. You people are disgusting..


#23 Jai604

Jai604

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,039 posts
  • Joined: 14-October 10

Posted 18 February 2013 - 05:22 PM

Oh lawd, that was horrendous, lol.
  • 0

RIP LB RR PD


#24 Edlerberry

Edlerberry

    Canucks Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,245 posts
  • Joined: 01-February 12

Posted 18 February 2013 - 05:24 PM

how stupid is that. OK so the linesman was "screened"... what kind of excuse is that? Video shows it, both sides know it. They should have a 'quick review' monitor that lets them see the play from useful angles (in this case top-down view) so video replay doesn't slow down the pace of the game, it'd take less time than arguing with the coaches.
  • 0
July 7-2013

Toronto will take a step back next year.
Feel free to quote me.


July 8-2013

Wow I can't believe peoples replies...
Im done here. You people are disgusting..


#25 blaise

blaise

    Canucks Third-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,350 posts
  • Joined: 17-October 06

Posted 18 February 2013 - 05:32 PM

Gotta agree with the other posters, linesman fault on that one, maybe he blinked or something. I'm just surprised none of the other officials saw something that obvious and didn't speak up afterwards. I'd say use video review, but if review was to be used on every offside call, the games would be 9 hours long

That's where it would be good to have a challenge system like in Football.Maybe if teams would have 1 or 2 challenges per game for things like offsides, penalty calls.....ect.

I know it will never happen,but it would not be a bad thing imo.
  • 1
GO CANUCKS GO

Posted Image
Posted ImageRIP Demitra, Rypien and lokomotiv team Posted Image

#26 Langdon Algur

Langdon Algur

    Canucks Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,669 posts
  • Joined: 05-July 07

Posted 18 February 2013 - 05:35 PM

The refs have been ESPESCIALLY bad this year. WOW

I wonder if this is the leagues' way of "getting the NHLPA back"... because people i know who dont even follow hockey are making better calls.

Also, it should all be video reviewable. The refs shouldn't be trying to defend themselves when they make a bad call, rather they should fix the call so the game plays the way it was intended. It should all be video reviewable, and each team should get a set number of call challenges or something. Its absolutely insanity.


I like the challenege idea, doesn't the NFL already have that. Each coach gets one challenege a peroid or something like that. It seems fair and wouldn't slow the game down that much, if anything it gives networks more commercial time which means more $$.
  • 0

Play Clash on Clans on your phone? Join the CDC Clan "happycanuck".


"What is the good of having a nice house without a decent planet to put it on?" ~ Henry David Thoreau

CDC's 2014 draft preferences vs. Canucks actual picks
http://forum.canucks...g-2014-edition/


#27 canucks.bradley

canucks.bradley

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,469 posts
  • Joined: 22-April 07

Posted 18 February 2013 - 05:53 PM

everyone makes mistakes. this video is evidence that the zebras are not just out to get the canucks....

and i agree with some of the posts above, there should be the option to challenge a call (say 1 per period - no rollover). If you get the call overturned...good, if you don't and the call on the ice stands, you get a 2 minute penalty so coaches just dont use the challenge as a time out.
  • 0
Posted Image
3000th post - September, 2010

K guys I nd hlp fast. Im @ a girls I rly like & txtng from my iphone. I did a #2 in the bathroom and it plugged, water is almost overflowing toilet. Srsly I dunno wut 2 do somebody help!


Watch Bowness somehow mess up Tampa Bay's already amazing 2 powerplay units...he'll probably tell Stamkos to do drop passes from centre ice, take him out from the faceoff dot, and place him infront of the goalie :lol:


#28 DownUndaCanuck

DownUndaCanuck

    Canucks Franchise Player

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 12,592 posts
  • Joined: 28-July 07

Posted 18 February 2013 - 05:53 PM

Never seen anything worse. The commentators say the linesman was screened but he clearly wasn't, and a referee saw the whole thing unfold perfectly. No excuse for that.

Bad bounces happen all the time, as do bad calls but this isn't even questionable. The only thing that's questionable now is the integrity of this joke of a league.
  • 0
Posted Image

#29 pimpcurtly

pimpcurtly

    Canucks Franchise Player

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 12,368 posts
  • Joined: 19-September 06

Posted 18 February 2013 - 06:01 PM

Bob Mackenzie just tweeted that the linesman mistakenly thought the puck was played into the zone by a Predator. Makes the mistake a little less egregious, IMO.
  • 2
Posted Image

#30 Down by the River

Down by the River

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,982 posts
  • Joined: 29-March 09

Posted 18 February 2013 - 06:05 PM

Bob McKenzie tweeted that the linesman thought the puck was played into the zone by a Nashville player and thus not offside.


Beat to it.


I can't decide whether I (a) don't buy it, or (b )believe it, but still think that the call is inexcusable.

Edited by Down by the River, 18 February 2013 - 06:06 PM.

  • 0

OMG we could've had McKeown!

I think Virtanen was a terrible pick given that he's out for 6 months which will hinder his development. You don't pick someone at #6 under that circumstance, along with the fact that he was given a 3/5 IQ (aka he's dumb). 

God dammit Benning. WHY VIRTANEN? Terrible move.

Down by the River - Crosby, Stills, Nash, and Young.





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Canucks.com is the official Web site of The Vancouver Canucks. The Vancouver Canucks and Canucks.com are trademarks of The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership.  NHL and the word mark and image of the Stanley Cup are registered trademarks and the NHL Shield and NHL Conference logos are trademarks of the National Hockey League. All NHL logos and marks and NHL team logos and marks as well as all other proprietary materials depicted herein are the property of the NHL and the respective NHL teams and may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of NHL Enterprises, L.P.  Copyright © 2009 The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership and the National Hockey League.  All Rights Reserved.