Jump to content

Welcome to canucks.com Vancouver Canucks homepage

Photo
- - - - -

Special teams thought

Discussion

  • Please log in to reply
12 replies to this topic

#1 Twine Bulger

Twine Bulger

    K-Wing Regular

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 14 posts
  • Joined: 22-December 09

Posted 18 February 2013 - 04:08 PM

Special teams can be one of the biggest factors to winning the game and i feel that there should be some little changes based on the players current play other then how they performed in the past.

First off alex edler, I love watching him play but this year he's been having an off season(it happends)
and when you put a player that is off his game on the pp/pk of course its going to struggle. The PP or PK should not be time for a player struggling to get his game back, especially in a short season.

Raymond- this guy is having a great bounce back year and with his speed he has better odds of finding that open spot or drawing defenders away from their position. This guy has 4 of his 5 goals on the odd man advantage and leads the team in pp goals.

Burrows- I think the PK is where he belongs and not the PP. He reads the play very well in the defencive zone but his production in the offencive zone drops drastically when he is not playing with the sedins.

Kessler- plays great with sedins on PP and they shouldnt split them up unless production slips.

Final thought- if it worked well in the past but not the present, we need to start making some changes for the future or else we're going to start looking more and more like the flames! :sadno:
  • 2

#2 TOMapleLaughs

TOMapleLaughs

    Canucks Hall-of-Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 32,221 posts
  • Joined: 19-September 05

Posted 18 February 2013 - 04:12 PM

Seems that these kind of threads go hand-in-hand with comments about Kessler, whoever he is.
  • 0
Posted Image

#3 Twine Bulger

Twine Bulger

    K-Wing Regular

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 14 posts
  • Joined: 22-December 09

Posted 18 February 2013 - 04:17 PM

Seems that these kind of threads go hand-in-hand with comments about Kessler, whoever he is.

Damn auto correct!
  • 0

#4 j3ff

j3ff

    Comets Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 372 posts
  • Joined: 21-May 11

Posted 18 February 2013 - 04:20 PM

I agree, but I must have missed your specific suggestions for immediatley improving our power play (which Kesler has already done)


Sedin, Sedin, Kesler is a lock for the 1st unit. I'm pretty tired of seeing Dan Sedin on the point.. I'd like to try Ballard - Edler on the points if we're going to experiment.

I don't think we should throw Raymond onto the 1st unit as he's been utilizing his time on the 2nd unit very well and his chemistry with Schredder is undeniable
  • 0

#5 Twine Bulger

Twine Bulger

    K-Wing Regular

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 14 posts
  • Joined: 22-December 09

Posted 18 February 2013 - 04:35 PM

I don't think we should throw Raymond onto the 1st unit

I agree and never said he should be on the first unit but if the first unit fails to produce in the first 30 secs put raymonds 2nd unit out right away and if that fails put the first unit back out but keep the shifts short so we dont have to watch players drag there feet in are own zone. Its easyer to stop a player coasting and not moving there feet then someone going full speed. Charge the zone not trickle in!
  • 0

#6 CanuckCup1316

CanuckCup1316

    Comets Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 226 posts
  • Joined: 13-March 12

Posted 18 February 2013 - 06:13 PM

The drop pass must stop!!!! Enter the zone with speed and hit brakes or continue. I swear my cat called the drop pass before it happened.
  • 1

#7 nuck nit

nuck nit

    Canucks Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,854 posts
  • Joined: 27-June 10

Posted 18 February 2013 - 06:17 PM

I miss Sami.It looks like Eddie does,as well.
  • 0

#8 Erik Karlsson

Erik Karlsson

    Canucks Second-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,766 posts
  • Joined: 24-March 09

Posted 18 February 2013 - 06:23 PM

I want to see

Sedin Kassian Sedin



Kesler Garrison


or

Sedin Kesler Sedin

Schroeder Garrison/Edler
  • 0

m97o1w.jpg

Credit to Parise11


#9 Bananas

Bananas

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,025 posts
  • Joined: 27-August 09

Posted 18 February 2013 - 06:29 PM

My thoughts:

PP Unit 1:

H.Sedin, Kesler, Burrows
D.Sedin, Garrison

D.Sedin - has looked good on the point this season and in the past. If we need him to start cycling, Kesler can swap in during any given shift.
H.Sedin - same stuff. Does it good.
Kesler - Very good at being the arbitrary floater that his hard to cover. Kesler gets open, and Kesler scores as a result.
Burrows - Obviously, Burrows has the best hands in front of the net. Kesler and Burrows can trade spots during a shift to throw off the defenders.
Garrison - since Garrison has no chemistry with any D-men, why bother putting any others on the PP? Garrison on the right side. Daniel -> Garrison -> BOMB.



PP Unit 2:

Raymond, Schroeder, Kassian
Ballard (SHOULD be Edler...), Bieksa

Raymond - similar to Kesler. A good drifter that is hard to pick up. Gets open, scores.
Schroeder - great passer, can shoot if he has a good opportunity. Schroeder is also good on the point if a D-man pinches/moves up.
Kassian - net pressence
Bieksa - shoot first. Good pincher for the most part.
Ballard - deserves a shot. Fast, good skater, good passer. Has a good shot, which most people have forgotten. Needs to be told to hold off on the pinches.


I'd like to see something like this.
  • 0
Hey CDC! Remember this!?

http://forum.canucks...in-this-change/

#10 1canuck67

1canuck67

    Comets Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 219 posts
  • Joined: 16-April 09

Posted 18 February 2013 - 08:09 PM

I agree, something needs to change, not major changes, but something that will stop the D from totally breaking down like they have been lately....maybe a specialy team coaching suffle?

As many here already know, the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result.
  • 0

#11 Teen Icarus

Teen Icarus

    Comets Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 982 posts
  • Joined: 06-November 09

Posted 18 February 2013 - 08:34 PM

My thoughts:

PP1:
Sedin-Sedin-Kesler
Ballard-Edler

PP2:
Raymond-Schroeder-Burrows
Bieksa-Garrison
  • 0
Spoiler

#12 Twine Bulger

Twine Bulger

    K-Wing Regular

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 14 posts
  • Joined: 22-December 09

Posted 18 February 2013 - 08:49 PM

As many here already know, the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result.

I really hope the special teams coach has noticed that you cant do the same move every night, I would think you should have 3-5 different brake in moves and witch ones you use depends on the the teams PK style.

dancing and droping at the line is way too over used right now and the PP has to be leading the league in offsides also if there going to dump 'n' chase at least do it on net and get a rebound or a whisle. no?

special teams coach seems to still be on vacation and needs to start doing his homework on up coming games. I know easyer said then done but trying something new is better then sitting back hoping it will work next time. :picard:
  • 0

#13 yogolol

yogolol

    Canucks Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,045 posts
  • Joined: 28-December 11

Posted 18 February 2013 - 09:19 PM

I want to try Schroeder on the point with Sedins and Kesler upfront.
  • 0
Watch my hockey tributes! http://www.youtube.c...urjesuss/videos





Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: Discussion

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Canucks.com is the official Web site of The Vancouver Canucks. The Vancouver Canucks and Canucks.com are trademarks of The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership.  NHL and the word mark and image of the Stanley Cup are registered trademarks and the NHL Shield and NHL Conference logos are trademarks of the National Hockey League. All NHL logos and marks and NHL team logos and marks as well as all other proprietary materials depicted herein are the property of the NHL and the respective NHL teams and may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of NHL Enterprises, L.P.  Copyright © 2009 The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership and the National Hockey League.  All Rights Reserved.