Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

BC Budget


inane

Recommended Posts

BC had been talking about HST for years with the feds but before the election no decision was made when they were given a short fuse offer to get on board with the same deal as Ontario had signed.

The documents also appear to support, however, B.C. Finance Minister Colin Hansen's assertions that the Liberal government did not actually decide to bring in the new tax until bureaucrats briefed him on the province's financial future after the May 2009 election.

...

On April 26, during the election campaign, the Liberal Party was asked in a questionnaire from the B.C. Restaurant and Foodservice Association, "Will your party oppose harmonizing GST with PST in British Columbia?"

The party official response was "…A harmonized GST is not something that is contemplated in the B.C. Liberal platform, but we are committed to improving the tax system."

So the HST was not an issue in the election nor part of the Liberal election platform.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course it wasn't part of the platform why would you tell the people of the province your intentions were to discard two taxes so that they could offer a more punitive tax to cover them both. This had nothing to do with what was best for British Columbians it only had to do with shifting tax burden from businesses to british columbians and to cut a bigger swath for gaining taxes. I have no problem in a raise in tax. I have a problem in doing it on the backs of the poor rather than the rich. Which this did significantly.. I also have a problem in taking a 1.6 billion dollars as a bribe to do it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

According to a Ipsos Reid about the budget, 12% believe the budget will be balanced. Only 11% will be more likely to vote for Christy Clark.

Amazingly, 44% of respondents believed the budget under the NDP would be worse. Only 28% believe the budget under the NDP will be better.

http://www.globaltvb...4142/story.html

Not exactly a ringing endorsement of the NDP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

According to a Ipsos Reid about the budget, 12% believe the budget will be balanced. Only 11% will be more likely to vote for Christy Clark.

Amazingly, 44% of respondents believed the budget under the NDP would be worse. Only 28% believe the budget under the NDP will be better.

http://www.globaltvb...4142/story.html

Not exactly a ringing endorsement of the NDP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm far from a Liberal supporter but that's simply not true. Under the HST, the people who would have paid more were the middle/upper middle class and the rich.

-The Liberals botched the launch of and then failed miserably at selling the very real benefits of HST. That's where they're guilty.

-The NDP conspired with VZ on a false propaganda campaign to defeat the HST as a political party battle not a noble "for the people one.

It's sad that people here are arguing about these two parties like either one of them deserves your vote. One was arrogant and incompetent. The other underhanded and self serving. Why are any of you defending/supporting either of them?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love how Anti- NDP ers say that they brought all this damage to BC. I have yet to see economic data that supports this (ie. the NDP era was significantly worse than the Lib era).

Was the NDP responsible for the closure of the coal mines in Tumbler Ridge, and the Libs for their reopening? The answer is NO, coal prices were. The NDP era was full of stagnant/falling prices for resources like coal, gold, etc and the Lib era was full of these prices going through the roof. Since our economy has a significant portion based in the resource sector, what kind of effect do you think this had. Closed mines, reduced production, reduced expansion, reduced exploration during the NPD. The opposite during the Libs. I'll grant the Libs for reducing the red tape, but it is prices that ultimately gets the ball rolling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BC had been talking about HST for years with the feds but before the election no decision was made when they were given a short fuse offer to get on board with the same deal as Ontario had signed.

The documents also appear to support, however, B.C. Finance Minister Colin Hansen's assertions that the Liberal government did not actually decide to bring in the new tax until bureaucrats briefed him on the province's financial future after the May 2009 election.

...

On April 26, during the election campaign, the Liberal Party was asked in a questionnaire from the B.C. Restaurant and Foodservice Association, "Will your party oppose harmonizing GST with PST in British Columbia?"

The party official response was "…A harmonized GST is not something that is contemplated in the B.C. Liberal platform, but we are committed to improving the tax system."

So the HST was not an issue in the election nor part of the Liberal election platform.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So if they were talking about the HST for years with the Feds are were supportive of the tax with federal help then why didn't they say that when asked pre-election? Instead the Fiberials said they had no plans to bring in the HST at all. All they had to say is they think the tax is a good idea but would only bring it in with Federal help, instead they said they had no plans to bring in the HST then brought it in, how does that not look fishy?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...