Jump to content

Welcome to canucks.com Vancouver Canucks homepage

Photo
- - - - -

Patrick Kane's shootout goal not a goal


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
11 replies to this topic

#1 The Magician

The Magician

    Canucks First-Line

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,921 posts
  • Joined: 13-January 12

Posted 19 February 2013 - 09:48 PM

Patrick Kane's shoot out goal was not a goal. Seeing the way the reffing went tonight I understand why it was a goal. The puck hit Shneiders pad, went backwards toward his glove, cancelling out forward momentum of the puck, and in the net. I know we stole a point but we could have had two <_<

nN5BCfs.jpg


#2 Rypien37

Rypien37

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,585 posts
  • Joined: 26-March 07

Posted 19 February 2013 - 09:49 PM

It was 100% a goal. Schneider put it in himself. Stop complaining. We deserved to lose, and were extremely lucky to even get a point.
Posted Image

R.I.P. Your heart and fearlessness will be remembered


#3 Grapefruits

Grapefruits

    Fruit

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 11,685 posts
  • Joined: 18-March 08

Posted 19 February 2013 - 09:50 PM

Straws... you're grasping at them.

qrak1x.jpg


#4 Starfruits

Starfruits

    Canucks Third-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,861 posts
  • Joined: 10-August 09

Posted 19 February 2013 - 09:50 PM

Can't believe that consider as a goal when the ref already called it off before the puck went past the line...

#5 hockeyville88

hockeyville88

    Canucks Hall-of-Famer

  • Super Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 26,560 posts
  • Joined: 24-October 06

Posted 19 February 2013 - 09:51 PM

It was a goal. No secondary contact was made by Kane. Schneider made the save but his motion put the puck in. It happens. We don't want to win based on a lie.It was a good goal.
Posted Image
Sig credit: GoaltenderInterference. Thanks!

#6 westcoast

westcoast

    Canucks Third-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,415 posts
  • Joined: 21-January 03

Posted 19 February 2013 - 09:51 PM

It was part of the play I thought

#7 -Vintage Canuck-

-Vintage Canuck-

    Canucks Hall-of-Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 79,383 posts
  • Joined: 24-May 10

Posted 19 February 2013 - 09:52 PM

Yeah, it was a goal.

307mg00.jpg


#8 MrsCanuck

MrsCanuck

    Canucks Third-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,635 posts
  • Joined: 20-March 09

Posted 19 February 2013 - 09:52 PM

Our shooters are pathetic in shootouts either way so might as well saved ourself the suffering of seeing someone pull out another "Burrows-spin" move.
Posted Image

#9 CanucksSayEh

CanucksSayEh

    Canucks Third-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,465 posts
  • Joined: 07-March 12

Posted 19 February 2013 - 09:52 PM

What really gets me is that the play was blown dead while the puck was on the goalline during the 2nd period. WTF man?!?

#10 AppleJack

AppleJack

    Canucks Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,753 posts
  • Joined: 26-February 12

Posted 19 February 2013 - 09:53 PM

I kind of agree it wasn't a goal because they had already had said no goal, then it went in so they said it was a goal <_< Correct me if I am wrong but if a goalie makes a stop they say no goal, then the goal trickles in... in a shoot out shouldn't the original save stand? I mean its not like a game where they can keep chipping at it, or in this case where the goalie puts it in. The already had said no goal then suddenly its a goal to me that should not count!

29mln9e.jpg

CHOCOLATE RAIN, YOU GUYS! CHOCOLATE RAIN!

Do Not Trade Tanevbjhfh0.jpg

 


#11 Where's Wellwood

Where's Wellwood

    Canucks Third-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,639 posts
  • Joined: 12-May 10

Posted 19 February 2013 - 09:54 PM

^^^

Exactly. I agree with the refs that it didn't cross the line, but it also wasn't covered by Emery. The play should still have gone on.

<---------- I Found Wellwood!!!

14diqh3.jpg
Credit to khalifawiz501 for the sig.
"There is a time and place for everything but not now."

http://forum.canucks...been-converted/

 


#12 debluvscanucks

debluvscanucks

    Canucks Hall-of-Famer

  • Super Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 28,218 posts
  • Joined: 19-February 08

Posted 19 February 2013 - 09:54 PM

Posted Image

2421657-1-1-1-1-1.jpg

You can be livin the dream at home. Dont even need to put yer pants on.

-Offensive Threat





Canucks.com is the official Web site of The Vancouver Canucks. The Vancouver Canucks and Canucks.com are trademarks of The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership.  NHL and the word mark and image of the Stanley Cup are registered trademarks and the NHL Shield and NHL Conference logos are trademarks of the National Hockey League. All NHL logos and marks and NHL team logos and marks as well as all other proprietary materials depicted herein are the property of the NHL and the respective NHL teams and may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of NHL Enterprises, L.P.  Copyright © 2009 The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership and the National Hockey League.  All Rights Reserved.