• Announcements

    • StealthNuck

      Forum-specific Rules   07/11/2017

      These are board specific rules for the Trades and Rumors forum designed to provide organization and a better experience for everyone. Please review these rules before posting new threads. 
        THREAD ETIQUETTE   1. Please search for an existing thread before posting. This forum can be very fast moving, so it's understandable if redundant threads are inadvertently posted. In such a case, please use the report feature to request removal of redundant threads.    2. Provide a clearly identifiable topic title so that users can readily understand the content. The title should include any and all teams involved, as well as player names or other personnel involved as appropriate.   3. All trades, signings, rumors and other news MUST include a linkable source. Simply posting the name of the source is not enough. Effort should also be made to copy and paste the full article, or at the very least the relevant portion of text from the source to the first post of the thread. Moderators may remove low-quality threads in favour of high-quality threads. 

      Affixed to the front of your title should be a label that identifies the type of transaction that is taking place. For all trades use [TRADE]. For all signings use [SIGNING]. For all waiver-wire transactions use [WAIVERS]. For all rumours use [RUMOUR].
      For articles or news items that don't fit into the above categories, affix an appropriate label of your choice such as [NEWS], [ARTICLE] or [MISC].   4. When the status of a thread changes a new thread can be created. The new thread should reflect the change and help focus the discussion on current events. e.g. Someone may create a new thread when a rumor becomes a trades. The old thread will be locked by the moderating team.    5. Do not misrepresent the contents of your thread or post false trades or rumors. Trolling will result in a permanent suspension. 

      SOURCES   The following source types are considered INVALID. Any links to posts or threads on other message boards Any links to personal blogs Any news heard on the radio that does not have a link to an audio vault or podcast Any news seen on television that does not have a link to online video Any news spread by word of mouth
      Additionally, certain sources may be be blacklisted due to poor credentials, clear traffic-mongering etc. Blacklisted sources will be posted here. 
      Thank you for your co-operation and please PM the Administrator or Moderators if you have any questions, concerns or suggestions regarding this forum.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Templeton Peck

[Discussion] Roberto Luongo Trade Thread 6.0

3,105 posts in this topic

And why would you rather have the Tampa deal exactly? Ryan Johansen is loaded with potential, Steve Mason is young enough to turn around his developement and could still be a number 1 in the future, plus a first round pick in a deep draft is always good and gives you more options to make a deal at the draft.

Hedman is good, on the verge of really good, but the other trade benefits the Canucks better for the future.

Jensen Johansen Kassian :)

Edit: I'm speaking of the return only in the proposal, not what pieces the Canucks are giving up.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In any case, lets get a legitimate 2C. That way Booth and Kesler see an increase in production. It is not fair to call Booth a bust when he's no-pass-Kesler's wing. I want to see what he can do if he gets passes.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

IMHO, that Clb deal is not good value.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In any case, lets get a legitimate 2C. That way Booth and Kesler see an increase in production. It is not fair to call Booth a bust when he's no-pass-Kesler's wing. I want to see what he can do if he gets passes.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think so (but there are some new posters that sound a lot like him).

Re topic: what do you think about:

Luongo + Schroeder + Suave + 2nd round pick

For

Gudbranson + Goc + Upshall + 1st round pick

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think so (but there are some new posters that sound a lot like him).

Re topic: what do you think about:

Luongo + Schroeder + Suave + 2nd round pick

For

Gudbranson + Goc + Upshall + 1st round pick

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I like the deal, but I have one thing I'd counter/amend.

Either I'd substitute Drew Shore for the 1st coming back our way, substitute out Schroeder, or remove both Schroeder and their 1st.

I don't see Florida having a great deal of interest in a C/Schroeder considering even without Goc, they'd have Weiss, Huberdeau, Shore, Matthias, Mueller, Santorelli, Howden, Bjugstad, Grimaldi, Rau... and from our side, unless we bring back a pair of centers, I wouldn't want to move Schroeder.

Aside from that, I really like that deal.

Or your deal could be left as is if Florida wanted Schroeder - it would still facilitate a deal for one of our left side D - and the Canucks could go out and acquire another depth C in a separate deal if they saw fit.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They probably wouldn't but I'd drive him to the airport myself for Florida's probable lottery pick. If that's a top 10 it's a win. If it's a top 5 it's a slam dunk. Another centre could be grabbed elsewhere.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think MG would be crazy to get Upshall. Been a cancer in almost every locker room he's been in

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think MG would be crazy to get Upshall. Been a cancer in almost every locker room he's been in

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think so (but there are some new posters that sound a lot like him).

Re topic: what do you think about:

Luongo + Schroeder + Suave + 2nd round pick

For

Gudbranson + Goc + Upshall + 1st round pick

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think with where florida sits in the standings they would trade their first, not aleast until the draft and the know where that pick is. If its not a top 5 pick them maybe they'd think about it

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I feel like this is all of a sudden sounding like a race of which goalie traded first. Will it be Schneider or Luongo? My money is still on Luongo although is a GM gives Gillis a beauty of a deal, I think he will have to trade Schneids.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

MG should set the price for both goaltenders if dealing with Florida.

Price for CS: Huberdeau or Gudbranson in the deal.

Price for Luo: Bjugstad or Petrovic +

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"@HeadtotheNet: Lebrun on the Team radio saying he senses a strong offer for #Canucks' Schneider will come over next few weeks."

Gotta be TB or CLB. Both Eastern teams to (CLB joining East).

I'd rather keep Corey but if the value is very high for him then I can understand why.

Schneid, Booth, Shroeder, 3rd

For

Johansen, Mason, Prospal, late 1st

Or

Schneid, Ballard, 2nd

For

Hedman, Garon

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In any case, lets get a legitimate 2C. That way Booth and Kesler see an increase in production. It is not fair to call Booth a bust when he's no-pass-Kesler's wing. I want to see what he can do if he gets passes.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.