• Announcements

    • StealthNuck

      All Threads Must Contain Tags!   07/25/2017

      ALL THREADS MUST CONTAIN TAGS   All threads in this forum must contain tags prefixed to topic titles. The purpose of the tags is to eliminate confusion in recent threads lists, and to create an organized and consistent environment. Moderators may immediately lock and thread that does not contain tags.    Tags must be placed at the start of your thread title, following this exact formatting:    [Tag] Thread Title   Here are some of the most used popular tags:    [Proposal]
      A trade, or trades, for next season, or even the off-season.
      [Off-Season]
      FA signings, off-season trades for RFA's, UFA's rights etc...
      [Value Of]
      (A question regarding a players worth, whether from another team, or the Canucks)
      [Speculation] Posting a rumor (with a source of course), but providing why it could be possible for the Canucks to land that player.   [Discussion]
      Thoughts on team trading strategy and composition.   Please feel free to create your own tag if none of these suit your thread.   

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

kanucks1

VANCOUVER-MONTREAL

18 posts in this topic

We need depth for playoffs, simple as that.

Without trading our goalies. If our defense doesn't show up than trading one of our goalies is a good backup plan.

To Montreal: Mason Raymond(I love him but u gotta give to get)

To Vancouver: Brendan Gallagher and Brandon Prust.

Lineup

Sedin Sedin Burrows

Booth Gallagher Kesler

Higgins Schroeder Hansen

Prust Lappy Kassian

Volpatti Weise

We could package J Schroeder or Gally with Lu for a big right handed d man or top six forward.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Montreal gets absolutely raped in this trade wtf.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OH lord this is just so bad on so many levels for MTL..

What goes through your head when you post this ?

If this is a legit idea for you then I have a nice piece of land to sell you.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dont see them doing Raymond for Prust, let alone Raymond for Prust AND Gallagher. They will keep them both

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

hahahaha, you think give to get means a streaky, soft, pending ufa in exchange for a possibly calder candidate and strong 3rd line winger who fights kills penalties and can kick in offensively?

Quite possibly the most delusional proposal I've seen on here

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hahaha Schroeder and weise for Andrew cogliano?

The ducks love him but they gotta give to get

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why would one of the smallest teams in the NHL want to give up one of their few tough guys and a good prospect for raymond?

:picard:

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Whenever I see a Montreal proposal I know it's going to be brutal. How would you like to give up Hansen and Schroeder for Armstrong?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.