kanucks1 Posted February 25, 2013 Share Posted February 25, 2013 We need depth for playoffs, simple as that. Without trading our goalies. If our defense doesn't show up than trading one of our goalies is a good backup plan. To Montreal: Mason Raymond(I love him but u gotta give to get) To Vancouver: Brendan Gallagher and Brandon Prust. Lineup Sedin Sedin Burrows Booth Gallagher Kesler Higgins Schroeder Hansen Prust Lappy Kassian Volpatti Weise We could package J Schroeder or Gally with Lu for a big right handed d man or top six forward. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChenWei91 Posted February 25, 2013 Share Posted February 25, 2013 Montreal gets absolutely raped in this trade wtf. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smashian Kassian Posted February 25, 2013 Share Posted February 25, 2013 Gallagher >>>>>>>> Raymond Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimLahey Posted February 25, 2013 Share Posted February 25, 2013 Montreal gets absolutely raped in this trade wtf. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AriGold Posted February 25, 2013 Share Posted February 25, 2013 OH lord this is just so bad on so many levels for MTL.. What goes through your head when you post this ? If this is a legit idea for you then I have a nice piece of land to sell you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SOB for MVP Posted February 25, 2013 Share Posted February 25, 2013 Dont see them doing Raymond for Prust, let alone Raymond for Prust AND Gallagher. They will keep them both Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted February 25, 2013 Share Posted February 25, 2013 Words can't describe how bad this is Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Garrison Posted February 25, 2013 Share Posted February 25, 2013 no. just no. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mau5trap Posted February 25, 2013 Share Posted February 25, 2013 Not sure if trolling or serious.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwijibo Posted February 25, 2013 Share Posted February 25, 2013 hahahaha, you think give to get means a streaky, soft, pending ufa in exchange for a possibly calder candidate and strong 3rd line winger who fights kills penalties and can kick in offensively? Quite possibly the most delusional proposal I've seen on here Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Durl Dixsun Posted February 25, 2013 Share Posted February 25, 2013 Montreal gets absolutely raped in this trade wtf. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hockeyfan90 Posted February 25, 2013 Share Posted February 25, 2013 lol just awful Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thad Posted February 25, 2013 Share Posted February 25, 2013 Hahaha Schroeder and weise for Andrew cogliano? The ducks love him but they gotta give to get Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marleau_12 Posted February 25, 2013 Share Posted February 25, 2013 Hahahahahaha. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malkin Cookies Posted February 25, 2013 Share Posted February 25, 2013 Why would one of the smallest teams in the NHL want to give up one of their few tough guys and a good prospect for raymond? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
palindrom Posted February 25, 2013 Share Posted February 25, 2013 2 years ago i proposed while Gallagher was an unknown prospect. To MTL: Peter Andersson To Van: Brendan Gallagher /topic/296891-proposal-mtl-van/">http://forum.canucks...oposal-mtl-van/ i wish we did this trade! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
laxgoalie Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 Whenever I see a Montreal proposal I know it's going to be brutal. How would you like to give up Hansen and Schroeder for Armstrong? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BurrsArrows Posted February 27, 2013 Share Posted February 27, 2013 good for us! too good! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.