FutureNHLGm Posted February 25, 2013 Share Posted February 25, 2013 This trade is contingent on if Crawford starts to lose the Blackhawks games. Schneider, Ballard to Chicago for Brent Seabrook, Crawford Brent is the RH shot we need on this team and I think a pairing of Edler-Seabrook would be a very good pairing. Tell me what you think. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Riviera82 Posted February 25, 2013 Share Posted February 25, 2013 Dont like it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ossi Vaananen Posted February 25, 2013 Share Posted February 25, 2013 Yuck, you should change your name to Milbury. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuktravella Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 have u been smoking crack rocks with charie sheen hawks laugh at you for such a ridiculous proposal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkeeterHansen Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 have u been smoking crack rocks with charie sheen hawks laugh at you for such a ridiculous proposal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FutureNHLGm Posted February 26, 2013 Author Share Posted February 26, 2013 Trade makes sense for both teams. I'd do it in a heartbeat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 Trade makes sense for both teams. I'd do it in a heartbeat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Otis Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 Chicago says no. Seabrook is a corner stone and Crawford has proven more then Schneider at this point. He was excellent in his rookie year(game 7 performance against us that year was amazing) and stellar this year. One bad season doesn't make a bad goalie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patrick Kane Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 Seabrook ain't going anywhere. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xur Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 Yeah this isn't happening at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BurrsArrows Posted February 27, 2013 Share Posted February 27, 2013 Neither players on Chicago are leaving Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AppleJack Posted February 27, 2013 Share Posted February 27, 2013 Why don't we trade Hansen's Record for Hossa Now to be serious.......... Why would Vancouver trade Schenids to their Arch Nemesis who could easily bring the Blackhawks to the promised land? Seriously? I don't see Vancouver trading with them but ..........give us Kane instead and I would be okay with it. I hate his attitude/off ice antics but that boy can play hockey! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
papagrizz Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 chicago hasnt lost in regulation yet, why would they make a trade when doing so well Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slappipappi Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 Chicago isn't trading Seabrook, especially for a goalie who hasn't proven himself and is playing quite poorly this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NP-4815162342 Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 The only way if trade schneider if I was mg is if Kane was involved his skill and passing is nuts and apparently he likes luongo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RyanKeslord17 Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 Schneider for Sharp + Krueger Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.