Jump to content

Welcome to canucks.com Vancouver Canucks homepage

- - - - -

Condensed Schedule - Who Will Suffer?

This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
2 replies to this topic

#1 D-Money


    Canucks Franchise Player

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,647 posts
  • Joined: 14-February 06

Posted 25 February 2013 - 04:55 PM

The Boston Bruins are at the tops of the league, with an 11-2-2 record. They have played 15 games - the least amount of anyone in the league.

Now, the question is, would they have a similar winning percentage with more games played? Or has their success been at least in part due to a fairly easy schedule so far? Will their ability to win games suffer when they start playing more?

We're about to find out. Starting tomorrow, the Bruins play 33 games in only 61 days. There are five back-to-backs, and only one 2-day rest. You gotta think that fatigue and injuries will set them back a bit. Especially when their cornerstone defenseman is turning 36.

Who else may suffer from the schedule tightening up on them? My guess is the Calgary Flames. Starting March 6th, they play 29 games in 56 days, including six back-to-backs. Most of their key players are in their mid-30's, and in recent years have a very poor record in the second half of back-to-backs. They are still in the mix standings-wise for a playoff spot, but they really needed to make hay with the lighter early schedule, because it's only going to get harder for them.

On the other hand, Detroit's schedule seems to get easier later in the season. They played 19 games in the first 37 days, with a few 2-day rests, but for the rest of the season have multiple 2/3-day rest breaks. They also have multiple games against the Oilers, Avalanche, Blue Jackets, and Flames left (almost 1/3 of their remaining games are against those bottom-feeders).

Are there any teams that you think will suffer or benefit from the nuances of this year's schedule?


#2 MoneypuckOverlord


    Canucks Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,295 posts
  • Joined: 24-September 09

Posted 25 February 2013 - 05:34 PM

Everyone is in the same boat. Boston has always been a good team, they've been healthy from the start, for us, we just got Kesler and just recently ended a 4 games in 6 nights brutality road trip. The team with the fewest depth will suffer the most.


Well, I , I feel very good about this draft, but I, I think, potentially you know were gonna have 3 or 4 NHL players out of this group, ummmm, you know like we are not going to prejudice to were they are from.


-Jim Benning June 27, 2015 shortly after the completion of the 2015 NHL Entry draft in Miami Florida.

#3 Hugemanskost


    Canucks Third-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,384 posts
  • Joined: 31-December 09

Posted 25 February 2013 - 11:40 PM

Teams in the West and poor Winnipeg because of travel.


:towel: :canucks:

Canucks.com is the official Web site of The Vancouver Canucks. The Vancouver Canucks and Canucks.com are trademarks of The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership.  NHL and the word mark and image of the Stanley Cup are registered trademarks and the NHL Shield and NHL Conference logos are trademarks of the National Hockey League. All NHL logos and marks and NHL team logos and marks as well as all other proprietary materials depicted herein are the property of the NHL and the respective NHL teams and may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of NHL Enterprises, L.P.  Copyright © 2009 The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership and the National Hockey League.  All Rights Reserved.