Jump to content

Welcome to canucks.com Vancouver Canucks homepage

Photo
* * * * * 1 votes

Burrows, do the refs really 'love' him or what?


  • Please log in to reply
61 replies to this topic

#61 thema

thema

    Comets Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 991 posts
  • Joined: 23-June 12

Posted 01 March 2013 - 01:40 PM

coyotecanuck replied about the circumstantial evidence...but I would like to add..You've watched Alex play and seen that he took less than market and never complained, how he conducts himself in front of the cameras usually. Now do you actually think that this guy would voluntarily lie on national TV about this? You could tell he was agitated when he was talking. It probably wasn't the best idea to talk while still angry but he did. Do you honestly think a character like Alex could or would even do that? What's in it for him? A lot of misery.

And to expand on the circumstantial evidence. There is video of Auger coming up and talking to him before the game, and they don't look like they're sharing a Francophone joke. Then during the game Burrows gets called for two phantom penalties one interference and one diving. This was the first diving penalty of the year and something like the second in his entire NHL career. You'd think he's have more of a record if he was as bad as Ron Mclean let on. Even Lu after the game supported Alex and called the penalties bogus.

From the Predators game January 11, 2010,

Diving (call initially no one knew what the penalty was):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=yrULavQbt2A

Then the Interference:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=8e8DdkLl-lU

All this in a close game, and still Alex scores two goals, but the penalties cost us and we lost the game.

I don't see how anyone could doubt what happened.



Key word here: "circumstantial".

Hey I agree with everybody; Auger was no good as a ref. But for Burrows to accuse an NHL official of conduct that would get him fired immediately if it could be proven and for him to have no proof other than the two talked to each other is simply asking for trouble.
  • 0

#62 babych

babych

    Canucks Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,193 posts
  • Joined: 12-April 08

Posted 20 March 2013 - 09:44 PM

I do.
  • 0
QUOTE
(shiznak@Jun 17 2008, 08:00 PM)
Kesler was lucky to score 20 this year since the injury to Morrison allowed him to do so.

I doubt Kesler would ever break 15 goals in his career again.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Canucks.com is the official Web site of The Vancouver Canucks. The Vancouver Canucks and Canucks.com are trademarks of The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership.  NHL and the word mark and image of the Stanley Cup are registered trademarks and the NHL Shield and NHL Conference logos are trademarks of the National Hockey League. All NHL logos and marks and NHL team logos and marks as well as all other proprietary materials depicted herein are the property of the NHL and the respective NHL teams and may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of NHL Enterprises, L.P.  Copyright © 2009 The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership and the National Hockey League.  All Rights Reserved.