• Announcements

    • StealthNuck

      Forum-specific Rules   07/11/2017

      These are board specific rules for the Trades and Rumors forum designed to provide organization and a better experience for everyone. Please review these rules before posting new threads. 
        THREAD ETIQUETTE   1. Please search for an existing thread before posting. This forum can be very fast moving, so it's understandable if redundant threads are inadvertently posted. In such a case, please use the report feature to request removal of redundant threads.    2. Provide a clearly identifiable topic title so that users can readily understand the content. The title should include any and all teams involved, as well as player names or other personnel involved as appropriate.   3. All trades, signings, rumors and other news MUST include a linkable source. Simply posting the name of the source is not enough. Effort should also be made to copy and paste the full article, or at the very least the relevant portion of text from the source to the first post of the thread. Moderators may remove low-quality threads in favour of high-quality threads. 

      Affixed to the front of your title should be a label that identifies the type of transaction that is taking place. For all trades use [TRADE]. For all signings use [SIGNING]. For all waiver-wire transactions use [WAIVERS]. For all rumours use [RUMOUR].
      For articles or news items that don't fit into the above categories, affix an appropriate label of your choice such as [NEWS], [ARTICLE] or [MISC].   4. When the status of a thread changes a new thread can be created. The new thread should reflect the change and help focus the discussion on current events. e.g. Someone may create a new thread when a rumor becomes a trades. The old thread will be locked by the moderating team.    5. Do not misrepresent the contents of your thread or post false trades or rumors. Trolling will result in a permanent suspension. 

      SOURCES   The following source types are considered INVALID. Any links to posts or threads on other message boards Any links to personal blogs Any news heard on the radio that does not have a link to an audio vault or podcast Any news seen on television that does not have a link to online video Any news spread by word of mouth
      Additionally, certain sources may be be blacklisted due to poor credentials, clear traffic-mongering etc. Blacklisted sources will be posted here. 
      Thank you for your co-operation and please PM the Administrator or Moderators if you have any questions, concerns or suggestions regarding this forum.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Vancouver Canucks 30

!

664 posts in this topic

No Question Schneider is playing top really well just now... but the real question is more like, if nobody wants Luongo (except for a bag of pucks), is the club prepared to have 5,3 mill sitting on the bench forever?? I think most agree that the money for either goalkeeper, would be spent better on a player that would be playing every game. It is not as if clubs have been queing up to take Lou???

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Canucks could trade Schneider away for a fantastic return and next year we could claim our 3rd Presidents Trophy in 4 years...

That is all.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Canucks could trade Schneider away for a fantastic return and next year we could claim our 3rd Presidents Trophy in 4 years...

That is all.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

With goal scoring dropping in the NHL its become even more important to have a goalie that can keep the puck out of the net. Why would we trade a goalie for even a 30 goal scorer if your other goalie has a mediocre season. The difference between Lou and schneids is that Schneider, based on his SP, can save more than 30 goals more than Lou, while lou would negate your increased offensive productivity.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You're saying Schneider isn't worth Tavares? I thought he was immensely better than Luongo and since Luongo is elite, Schneider must be equal or greater than Tavares...

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

WPG

Schneider

Ballard

Raymond

VAN

Kane

Byfuglien

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He'll only be traded if we get a pretty huge return now in my opinion.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How about this pipe dream of a deal if we were to trade Schneider..

Schneider Schroeder for Reinhart Strome lol

Future starting lineup

Jensen Strome Kassian

Reinhart Tanev

Lack

I don't even know if I'd give up Schneider for that but it makes your future pretty bright if lack moulds into the next Schneider

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

IF we trade Schneider, it will be for a ridiculous return. If I were Gillis I would push for Tavares, Streit and Neidereitter for Schneider, Ballard and the Canucks 2013 1st round draft pick.

I would prefer Kesler when he comes back to focus on the 3rd line C position and get back to his Selke form, and let Tavares anchor the 2nd line.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

IF we trade Schneider, it will be for a ridiculous return. If I were Gillis I would push for Tavares, Streit and Neidereitter for Schneider, Ballard and the Canucks 2013 1st round draft pick.

I would prefer Kesler when he comes back to focus on the 3rd line C position and get back to his Selke form, and let Tavares anchor the 2nd line.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You're joking right? Add Kesler to the deal and the isles might consider it.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You sir, are one twisted individual without a shred of credibility.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

IF we trade Schneider, it will be for a ridiculous return. If I were Gillis I would push for Tavares, Streit and Neidereitter for Schneider, Ballard and the Canucks 2013 1st round draft pick.

I would prefer Kesler when he comes back to focus on the 3rd line C position and get back to his Selke form, and let Tavares anchor the 2nd line.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no damn way NYI are going to trade Tavares. Fill their lineup in after that trade and try to say it's better than before.

Yeah, if Kesler was in that trade they MIGHT consider it, but really... Tavares IS NOT GOING ANYWHERE.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.