naslund.is.king Posted March 31, 2013 Share Posted March 31, 2013 Lol after tonight trade cory when his return is high Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Italia2006 Posted March 31, 2013 Share Posted March 31, 2013 The way the Canucks are built I think it's foolish not to trade Schneider. The Canucks are built for now and it's not like Schneider is a 21 year old kid who can play as our goalie for the next 13 years. To me it makes perfect sense to trade Schneider and get some future star up front who can take the torch from the Sedins. The Sedins are on the declined and we can all agree the Canucks can't score right now. I understand we have injuries but we do have healthy Sedins and Burrows. Luongo is good enough for now and I'd like to think he could help groom Lack to be our future #1. We could buy Lu out at 37-38 and hopefully Lack can take over. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canucks_Hockey_101 Posted March 31, 2013 Share Posted March 31, 2013 The way the Canucks are built I think it's foolish not to trade Schneider. The Canucks are built for now and it's not like Schneider is a 21 year old kid who can play as our goalie for the next 13 years. To me it makes perfect sense to trade Schneider and get some future star up front who can take the torch from the Sedins. The Sedins are on the declined and we can all agree the Canucks can't score right now. I understand we have injuries but we do have healthy Sedins and Burrows. Luongo is good enough for now and I'd like to think he could help groom Lack to be our future #1. We could buy Lu out at 37-38 and hopefully Lack can take over. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Italia2006 Posted March 31, 2013 Share Posted March 31, 2013 PHI Schneider VAN Couturier 1st Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ForsbergTheGreat Posted March 31, 2013 Share Posted March 31, 2013 The way the Canucks are built I think it's foolish not to trade Schneider. The Canucks are built for now and it's not like Schneider is a 21 year old kid who can play as our goalie for the next 13 years. To me it makes perfect sense to trade Schneider and get some future star up front who can take the torch from the Sedins. The Sedins are on the declined and we can all agree the Canucks can't score right now. I understand we have injuries but we do have healthy Sedins and Burrows. Luongo is good enough for now and I'd like to think he could help groom Lack to be our future #1. We could buy Lu out at 37-38 and hopefully Lack can take over. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Italia2006 Posted March 31, 2013 Share Posted March 31, 2013 What a contradicting paragraph? First of all who is this future star we can trade Cory for? Second no cory isn't 21 he's only 27 so if he plays till 37-38 like you assume Luo will play that's, 10-11 years of solid goaltending. Also Lack isn't some 21 year old stud either. He's 25 and coming off hip surgery. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ForsbergTheGreat Posted March 31, 2013 Share Posted March 31, 2013 I'm thinking teams like Columbus, Winnipeg, New Jersey. That's the other great thing about trading Schneider, we can trade him to any team we want. I'd also love to get some local boys like a Kane or a Johansen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ForsbergTheGreat Posted March 31, 2013 Share Posted March 31, 2013 You tell me who the future star is? I think Cory has a high trade value and can't tell us he only wants to go to Florida. Hopefully Lack is fine after the surgery. I understand he's not 21 but he is 2 years younger than Schneider and could split the duties with Lu in the future. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Italia2006 Posted March 31, 2013 Share Posted March 31, 2013 CBJ has Bobrovsky, younger than and shown he's capable of playing lights out. Why would CBJ give up a future player to replace a goalie they don't need to replace. WPG has Pavelec, they just signed him long term and he's been everything their team needs. Cory's not that much of an upgrade that team would be better with him and the loss of Kane. NJ has to pay Marty 5 mil next season. A team which is extremely low on cash is not going to spend 9 mil on goaltending next season. 0/3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ForsbergTheGreat Posted March 31, 2013 Share Posted March 31, 2013 dbl post Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Italia2006 Posted March 31, 2013 Share Posted March 31, 2013 Your the one who said we can get this future star. Cory has high trade value but in order to get his true value you need a team willing to pay that price. Just because cory is an upgrade to a teams current goalie doesn't mean they'd be willing to sell the farm to acquire him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ForsbergTheGreat Posted March 31, 2013 Share Posted March 31, 2013 The way you're making it sound is like no team in the NHL could use a goalie. The 3 teams I named could use it. Brobosky has played great but lets see how the rest of his year goes. New Jersey needs to start thinking about what they're going to do after next year. Good goalies don't just come by every day. Winnipeg has one of the worst goals against. They have a rich owner and they can afford to spend some money. I'm sure we could agree that Pavelec isn't in the same ball park as Schneider. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Italia2006 Posted March 31, 2013 Share Posted March 31, 2013 I agree cory is a better goalie than Pavelec, but is WPG a better team with Cory in net minus Kane? Not only that what are they going to do with having Pavelec signed with a cap hit at 3.9 million till 2016? Buy him out? Trade him for scraps? So in essence your saying Cory's value is worth Kane and Pavelec. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Salmonberries Posted March 31, 2013 Share Posted March 31, 2013 PHI Schneider VAN Couturier 1st Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Salmonberries Posted March 31, 2013 Share Posted March 31, 2013 IF we trade Schneider, it will be for a ridiculous return. If I were Gillis I would push for Tavares, Streit and Neidereitter for Schneider, Ballard and the Canucks 2013 1st round draft pick. I would prefer Kesler when he comes back to focus on the 3rd line C position and get back to his Selke form, and let Tavares anchor the 2nd line. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Salmonberries Posted March 31, 2013 Share Posted March 31, 2013 There's some freaking comic gold in this thread. More please! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edler's Mind Tricks Posted March 31, 2013 Share Posted March 31, 2013 Gagne and Khabibulin for Lu Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Salmonberries Posted March 31, 2013 Share Posted March 31, 2013 BWAHAHAHAHA!! More please!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Primus099 Posted March 31, 2013 Share Posted March 31, 2013 Franchise player for franchise player Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Salmonberries Posted March 31, 2013 Share Posted March 31, 2013 lol @ putting Schneider is the same category as Tavares when it comes to Franchise players. The Isles would be nothing without him, he's way more important to them than Schneids is to us Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.