canuck73_3 Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 I didn't mean the patti=burr in any way. Patti was clearly an asset seeing as he was picked up by a skilled team like the caps. Can you make sence of this move as of right now? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elvis15 Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 Yup, too bad he got claimed. He and his agent noted he hadn't heard much interest from the Caps before but had heard interest from some other teams, so he was surprised they claimed him. TSNRyanRishaug Source confirms Oilers were one of several teams who had a claim in on Volpatti. Caps lower in standings, they got him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duda Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 It was because of Pinizzotto coming off his injury. We had a full roster of 23 already. There was a technical requirement to put Pinizzotto on the NHL roster before he could be assigned to Chicago for a conditioning assignment. Due to this we had to clear a roster spot. Volpatti got the nod. Now, IF Volpatti had cleared waivers, he could have played 10 games up before technically being required to be assigned to Chicago. I believe this was the plan. The team would then have had the time to evaluate Volpatti vs Pinizzotto and made a decision as to which to keep up with the big club. If Volpatti had gone past the 10 game mark, the waiver would simply expire, no harm, no foul. During the 10 game period and conditioning stint, we would technically have Pinizzotto on Van's roster while playing in Chi, and Volpatti on Chi's roster while playing in Van. Other choices would have been: Weise - (many believe a better choice than Volpatti, most likely Volpatti was chosen over Weise because Weise fills in on other lines, Volpatti never does) Barker - gone for sure Alberts - same, depth D we actually need at this point After that we are into full time roster players. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
73 Percent Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 Yeah we put a dime a dozen player on waivers replacing him with a different dime a dozen player. And CDC overreacts as usual.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kassian 09 Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 Lost frackin a native of bc player fir nothing! He was the only pure grit player we had. Wr need to get rid of this management and coaches NOW! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldnews Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 A lot of premature noise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Claiborne55 Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 It was because of Pinizzotto coming off his injury. We had a full roster of 23 already. There was a technical requirement to put Pinizzotto on the NHL roster before he could be assigned to Chicago for a conditioning assignment. Due to this we had to clear a roster spot. Volpatti got the nod. Now, IF Volpatti had cleared waivers, he could have played 10 games up before technically being required to be assigned to Chicago. I believe this was the plan. The team would then have had the time to evaluate Volpatti vs Pinizzotto and made a decision as to which to keep up with the big club. If Volpatti had gone past the 10 game mark, the waiver would simply expire, no harm, no foul. During the 10 game period and conditioning stint, we would technically have Pinizzotto on Van's roster while playing in Chi, and Volpatti on Chi's roster while playing in Van. Other choices would have been: Weise - (many believe a better choice than Volpatti, most likely Volpatti was chosen over Weise because Weise fills in on other lines, Volpatti never does) Barker - gone for sure Alberts - same, depth D we actually need at this point After that we are into full time roster players. I liked Volpatti, but I am now curious to see how we can upgrade. If no trade happens, Ebbett will fill in for Kes, then i am not sure who will come up, Bill Sweatt maybe. If a trade happens, we could see an upgrade, perhaps a Ryane Clowe or a Ryan O'Reilly, pretty far out there, just saying I am curious to see how we could use this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elvis15 Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 It was because of Pinizzotto coming off his injury. We had a full roster of 23 already. There was a technical requirement to put Pinizzotto on the NHL roster before he could be assigned to Chicago for a conditioning assignment. Due to this we had to clear a roster spot. Volpatti got the nod. Now, IF Volpatti had cleared waivers, he could have played 10 games up before technically being required to be assigned to Chicago. I believe this was the plan. The team would then have had the time to evaluate Volpatti vs Pinizzotto and made a decision as to which to keep up with the big club. If Volpatti had gone past the 10 game mark, the waiver would simply expire, no harm, no foul. During the 10 game period and conditioning stint, we would technically have Pinizzotto on Van's roster while playing in Chi, and Volpatti on Chi's roster while playing in Van. ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuck73_3 Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 if good fighters/big hitters are dime a dozen why arent there any on the canucks roster? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wallstreetamigo Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 Putting Volpatti on waivers did not really make sense unless something else is going on. He is gone now but I never viewed him as a problem on the 4th line. At least he hit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scorevat Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 I'm starting to get really annoyed by theese decisions management has been making from the manny incident to putting patti on waivers and getting claimed. He had tremendous heart and put everything out on the ice, every shift. It kind of hurts because he was a fan favourite, and didn't fear anyone from a fight (reminds me of rick rypien, R.I.P). Really hope theres some plan behind these stupid moves such as jensen getting the call or pinizzotto getting a shot. Frustrating week with kes injured again :@ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skates_with_a_stick Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 Unfu#%ing believable! Good job idiot management. How could they lose Volpatti! He does a far better job than Wiese! I am too upset to elaborate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Provost Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 It was because of Pinizzotto coming off his injury. We had a full roster of 23 already. There was a technical requirement to put Pinizzotto on the NHL roster before he could be assigned to Chicago for a conditioning assignment. Due to this we had to clear a roster spot. Volpatti got the nod. Now, IF Volpatti had cleared waivers, he could have played 10 games up before technically being required to be assigned to Chicago. I believe this was the plan. The team would then have had the time to evaluate Volpatti vs Pinizzotto and made a decision as to which to keep up with the big club. If Volpatti had gone past the 10 game mark, the waiver would simply expire, no harm, no foul. During the 10 game period and conditioning stint, we would technically have Pinizzotto on Van's roster while playing in Chi, and Volpatti on Chi's roster while playing in Van. Other choices would have been: Weise - (many believe a better choice than Volpatti, most likely Volpatti was chosen over Weise because Weise fills in on other lines, Volpatti never does) Barker - gone for sure Alberts - same, depth D we actually need at this point After that we are into full time roster players. I liked Volpatti, but I am now curious to see how we can upgrade. If no trade happens, Ebbett will fill in for Kes, then i am not sure who will come up, Bill Sweatt maybe. If a trade happens, we could see an upgrade, perhaps a Ryane Clowe or a Ryan O'Reilly, pretty far out there, just saying I am curious to see how we could use this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Erik Karlsson Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 Great move Gillis, ya overrated bum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ice orca Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 How is my post "clueless"? If you're going to call somebody out at least make some sense. What's "clueless" about wanting a fighter and player you respect to win a fight against a fighter and player you don't respect? Because Weise is a Canuck and Volpatti isn't? Yeah that makes lots of sense. When somebody becomes a Canuck it doesn't make you obligated to fall in love with them. Classless I can't take. Homers love to throw that word around. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elvis15 Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 Putting Volpatti on waivers did not really make sense unless something else is going on. He is gone now but I never viewed him as a problem on the 4th line. At least he hit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greetingsfrombrazil Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 Hope we sign him in the off season if he's available. He was doing great, it sucks that we lost him because we didn't have enough depth at center. Great 4th liner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HKSR Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 Did management pull the waiver trigger too early without knowing what Kesler's status was gonna be? What are the rules regarding placing a player on IR? I assume since Kes is out for a month to month-and-a-half, we could have put Kes on IR to free up a spot on the roster instead of waiving Volpatti. Am I missing something here? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chrisbanks Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 just another crap move , well done vancouver. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moonshinefe Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 Wow, what the f*** were they thinking? I thought this team wanted to be tougher to play against, and we gave our main fighter away for nothing. Volpatti was a great 4th liner for us so far this year and that's how we repay him, great. They must have known he'd get claimed off waivers. I guess we get to watch Dale "the dutch all star" Weise get punched in the face repeatedly and lose fights from now on. I think AV has a Rome-crush on Weise and thinks he's going to be some sort of genuine scorer or something, not a freaking chance. Volpatti could actually win fights. So I guess now what is our 4th line? A terrible enforcer with 0 hands in Weise, Lapierre who has been under performing considering his skills, and I guess we're going to call up some unproven 4th liner who's been injured for 30 years? The Canucks management lately has been a joke. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.