Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

You're wrong, The Canucks are better than ever


Merci

Recommended Posts

If your team strategy depends on a player who has been injured for most of the last two years, then it's ot a very good strategy. That would be like if the bruins had been counting on Marc savard to lead them to the cup in 2011.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry OP but if losing one plate transforms us from a Stanley Cup contender to a losing team then we aren't as good as we think. On paper we are as good as ever however until we start playing like it our problems will continue. If you can't execute yor gameplan you aren't going anywhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Look it up the definition may surprise you. CDC uses the term bandwagon to refer to anyone they don't agree with. It has nothing to do with criticizing the team it refers to fans that only care about the team when they are winning. Vancouver has a lot of bandwagon fans but I don't think any of them would take the time to post on CDC.

There is really nothing wrong with bandwagon fans they add to the excitement in the playoffs buy tee shirts and jerseys to add $$$ to the team, then they just go away till the next time and really don't bother us at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We don't have Kesler.

Our 2nd line is Booth Lapierre Kassian

Other teams with the same amount of points as us; Detroit and Pittsburg

Their 2nd lines are

Franzen-Zetterberg-Bertuzzi

Kennedy-Malkin-Neal

So wise Canucks fans why should we have MORE points than these two teams, with no Kesler?

Because our defense and depth in goaltending should make us perennial contenders even with 14 million dollars of salary injured?

You're truly moronic to think we should be even higher in the standings with a 1/4 of our salary out for large chunks of the year.

It's not like we're not competing either we had 40 shots against SJ.

Canucks fans are such bandwagoners it hurts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We don't have Kesler.

Our 2nd line is Booth Lapierre Kassian

Other teams with the same amount of points as us; Detroit and Pittsburg

Their 2nd lines are

Franzen-Zetterberg-Bertuzzi

Kennedy-Malkin-Neal

So wise Canucks fans why should we have MORE points than these two teams, with no Kesler?

Because our defense and depth in goaltending should make us perennial contenders even with 14 million dollars of salary injured?

You're truly moronic to think we should be even higher in the standings with a 1/4 of our salary out for large chunks of the year.

It's not like we're not competing either we had 40 shots against SJ.

Canucks fans are such bandwagoners it hurts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...