Pears Posted March 10, 2013 Share Posted March 10, 2013 Columbus needs some top 6 wingers so I think they'd be happy with a Booth for Dubinsky swap Umberger - Johansen - Atkinson Booth - Brassard - Foligno Drazenovic - Anisimov - Prospal Boll - Letestu - Mackenzie Healthy line up Sedin - Sedin - Burrows Kassian - Kesler - Raymond Higgins - Dubinsky - Hansen Sestito - Lapierre - Weise Columbus is lookin good if they can add a 3rd line LW Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuretoMogilny Posted March 10, 2013 Share Posted March 10, 2013 So the article says Cbj can't afford Dubinsky and the first suggestion is that we give them Booth? Typical. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuretoMogilny Posted March 10, 2013 Share Posted March 10, 2013 Fairness is irrelevant. Both teams have to want to do the deal. Columbus is a low budget team, and are unlikely to take a chance on an overpaid, underperforming player. They'd be more likely to trade Dubinsky for cost effective assets such as picks, prospects or cheap roster players. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Master Mind Posted March 10, 2013 Share Posted March 10, 2013 Some of you are really overvaluing Dubinsky. Either that or really undervaluing our players. He's not worth 3 roster players. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Master Mind Posted March 10, 2013 Share Posted March 10, 2013 Well please send the article, people here read the OP's post, nothing there said anything about not affording him Settle down there champ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
70seven Posted March 10, 2013 Share Posted March 10, 2013 dubinsky for raymond + schroeder Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuretoMogilny Posted March 10, 2013 Share Posted March 10, 2013 It says right in the OP that his 4.2 cap hit is deemed too costly... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaMacNamedDre Posted March 10, 2013 Share Posted March 10, 2013 Adding Dubinsky and Jared boll would be just fine by me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuretoMogilny Posted March 10, 2013 Share Posted March 10, 2013 dubinsky for raymond + schroeder Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beluga Whale Posted March 10, 2013 Share Posted March 10, 2013 So Columbus is trying to get rid of Dubinksy to relieve some cap? CDC logic: Trade them Booth, who makes just as much and is an inferior player. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sestito29 Posted March 10, 2013 Share Posted March 10, 2013 So the article says Cbj can't afford Dubinsky and the first suggestion is that we give them Booth? Typical. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danthecanucksfan Posted March 10, 2013 Share Posted March 10, 2013 If they do not want to pay Dubinsky 4.2, why would they trade him for another roster player at 4.2 in booth? Id be guessing they'd want guys like Schroeder, Raymond, picks, and defensive prospects. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mookie Wilson Posted March 10, 2013 Share Posted March 10, 2013 Ok so we'll give up less...hmm... Think a bit buddy. As you said, he's underperforming. Hard to get rid of right? Well if they want a 4th rounder and Connaughton, or Weise, take em. Some how I don't think that will get it done. And Columbus doesn't have any real scorers. Booth has had over 30 I believe twice? then some injury issues. If anyone has a chance to hit 30 on that team it would be him. Worth the risk to swap for upside. Thats called asset mgmt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TOMapleLaughs Posted March 10, 2013 Share Posted March 10, 2013 costly overall? or for his role? if he's playing 3rd line, yes paying a guy 4.2 million is too much. again asset mgmt. Just like us paying a backup 5.6 million is too much. etc etc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
86Viking Posted March 10, 2013 Share Posted March 10, 2013 Raymond is the starting point. You go from there and try to figure out a deal. unless you try and make a huge trade sending them schneider but thats unlikely Dubinksy and aucoin for raymond and?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuretoMogilny Posted March 10, 2013 Share Posted March 10, 2013 In fact, it's in Vancouver, playing with talented players and away from the opposition's best checkers that Booth would have the best chance to put up 30 goals. I'm sure that was Gillis' thinking when he made the trade. If going to Columbus and getting more minutes and opportunity would help Booth, then why hasn't it worked that way for Dubinsky or Anisimov? I bet Hartikainen can think of better ways to invest 4.25M. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuretoMogilny Posted March 10, 2013 Share Posted March 10, 2013 'Too costly' as in 'too costly', champ. Btw Booth is playing on our 3rd line. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TOMapleLaughs Posted March 10, 2013 Share Posted March 10, 2013 What does that have to do with Cbj's finances, champ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuretoMogilny Posted March 10, 2013 Share Posted March 10, 2013 What does that have to do with Cbj's finances, champ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spyderr Posted March 10, 2013 Share Posted March 10, 2013 They wont take booth he has exactly zero goals for 4 mill Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.