Tony Romo Posted March 11, 2013 Share Posted March 11, 2013 Top prospect haha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marleau_12 Posted March 11, 2013 Share Posted March 11, 2013 Definitely not Corrado. Bobby Mac speaks highly of him! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MoneypuckOverlord Posted March 11, 2013 Share Posted March 11, 2013 What's funny is that you guys don't want to trade any of our recent first round picks on top of Frankie Corrado, but beyond those guys more of our prospects are useless. LOL Funny. You think L.A got guys like Carter and Richards for free?? It costed them 1st round picks or a prospect to obtain those players. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Papayas Posted March 11, 2013 Share Posted March 11, 2013 Cup now, refill the cupboard later works if it gives you a cup. What usually happens tho, is break you ???? cupboard and no cup. What happens when you dry your cupboard and fail to w in the cup? You will probably disappear along with the other band wagoner like the late 90s Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Durl Dixsun Posted March 11, 2013 Share Posted March 11, 2013 You call those chumps "top prospects"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lui's Knob Posted March 11, 2013 Share Posted March 11, 2013 Nobody likes gillis so trading partners are thin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VicNuckleHead09 Posted March 11, 2013 Share Posted March 11, 2013 Most of those players aren't top prospects. I wouldn't trade: - Nicklas Jensen - Jordan Schroeder - Brendan Gaunce - Frank Corrado I would be willing to maybe move Lack since we have so much goaltending depth. But it would have to be a good offer that either brought back a very good prospect/young player or in a package to bring something that helps now. And though I don't consider him quite on the level of these other guys (as our top prospects) I would also be willing to move Connaution. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smashian Kassian Posted March 11, 2013 Share Posted March 11, 2013 I think the organization has it in their minds that they need to develop him for a few years in the NHL. He is also a good emergency blanket for the pending goaltending decision. He is a very good goalie in the AHL and his trade value will only increase with a few years with the big club. Then again, they might look for a veteran goalie to fill the backup position Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CB007 Posted March 11, 2013 Share Posted March 11, 2013 These are guys who have not played a game in the NHL, and it's not like they are grade A blue chips. Why are they untouchable? If we can get equal value in return, why not? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJDDawg Posted March 11, 2013 Share Posted March 11, 2013 I'd say Jensen and Corrado are my sole untouchables Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Special Ed Posted March 11, 2013 Share Posted March 11, 2013 IMO trading top prospects is what got us into this mess in the first place. This is not the answer. To me there is not much we can do now Gillis already crapped the bed. Time to start stocking up again on top prospects if anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elvis15 Posted March 11, 2013 Share Posted March 11, 2013 Without an idea of what they'd bring back, none of them. I could say yes to Ben Hutton, but then find out what the other team wanted to trade was Tim Thomas and his suspended contract. I could say no to Jensen, but then find out the other team wanted to trade Adam Larsson. Each is situationally relevant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coconuts Posted March 11, 2013 Share Posted March 11, 2013 Everyone but Jensen, Gaunce, and Corrado. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
morrissex95 Posted March 11, 2013 Share Posted March 11, 2013 Everyone but Jensen, Gaunce, Corrado and Connauton. Schroeder is a valuable trade chip and could probably be a top 6 guy on another team but id rather trade him because of his lack of size Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bodee Posted March 11, 2013 Share Posted March 11, 2013 - Nicklas Jensen - Jordan Schroeder - Brendan Gaunce - Frank Corrad and I'd add Billy Sweatt. He has something about him and I would like us to give him a decent run. Having said that we have quite a few roster players I would part with before prospects. Honestly, if we REALLY crap the bed this year.......and who is to say we won't, I seriously doubt we should leave our draft picking in the hands of MG and his "scouts" (they are not worthy of the name) based on past history. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ohnoeszz Posted March 11, 2013 Share Posted March 11, 2013 You know Jensen's a keeper when not even one idiot on CDC wants to trade him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ice orca Posted March 11, 2013 Share Posted March 11, 2013 You know Jensen's a keeper when not even one idiot on CDC wants to trade him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cammy Posted March 11, 2013 Share Posted March 11, 2013 all the rest will get us scrubs....scrubs like pahlsson, who went get us anywhere near the cup. If we want a difference maker were gonna have to trade 1 of the "untouchables" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gonz Posted March 11, 2013 Share Posted March 11, 2013 Quite obvious this Canuck team needs a shakeup and that a piece is missing in our lineup. It's also quite obvious that there is no goalie market out for Schneids or Lu. Our other trade-able assets wont fetch us enough, guys like Booth, Ballard, Raymond. Having said that, we have some prospects that could garner some interest. Obviously the higher the prospect , the better the return What is your level of comfort in trading the future for the present. Who on this list can you trade. Cup now, re-fill the cupboard later is my stance! If any of these guys can get us that bonofide sniper and secondary scorer we desperately need then im willing to trade him, even if its Jensen. Look at teams like the Oilers and Jackets who have been getting 1st over picks, they are nowhere near the cup. You want a cupboard full of top prospects or a cupboard full of Stanley Cups?? Dont be shocked if Gillis moves the top guys on this list at the deadline. Nicklas JensenEddie LackJordan SchroederBrendan GaunceFrank CorradoKevin ConnautonAnton RodinAlexandre GrenierPatrick McNallyAlexandre MalletJoseph LabateJoe CannataYann SauveAdam PolasekHenrik TommernesAlex FriesenJeremy PriceBill SweattDavid HonzikBen Hutton Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CHodgson9 Posted March 11, 2013 Share Posted March 11, 2013 Barring The Sedins who should retire here, any player should be available for the right deal. If Crosby or Weber became available via trade, you would at least have to entertain the initial asking price. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.