• Announcements

    • StealthNuck

      Forum-specific Rules   07/11/2017

      These are board specific rules for the Trades and Rumors forum designed to provide organization and a better experience for everyone. Please review these rules before posting new threads. 
        THREAD ETIQUETTE   1. Please search for an existing thread before posting. This forum can be very fast moving, so it's understandable if redundant threads are inadvertently posted. In such a case, please use the report feature to request removal of redundant threads.    2. Provide a clearly identifiable topic title so that users can readily understand the content. The title should include any and all teams involved, as well as player names or other personnel involved as appropriate.   3. All trades, signings, rumors and other news MUST include a linkable source. Simply posting the name of the source is not enough. Effort should also be made to copy and paste the full article, or at the very least the relevant portion of text from the source to the first post of the thread. Moderators may remove low-quality threads in favour of high-quality threads. 

      Affixed to the front of your title should be a label that identifies the type of transaction that is taking place. For all trades use [TRADE]. For all signings use [SIGNING]. For all waiver-wire transactions use [WAIVERS]. For all rumours use [RUMOUR].
      For articles or news items that don't fit into the above categories, affix an appropriate label of your choice such as [NEWS], [ARTICLE] or [MISC].   4. When the status of a thread changes a new thread can be created. The new thread should reflect the change and help focus the discussion on current events. e.g. Someone may create a new thread when a rumor becomes a trades. The old thread will be locked by the moderating team.    5. Do not misrepresent the contents of your thread or post false trades or rumors. Trolling will result in a permanent suspension. 

      SOURCES   The following source types are considered INVALID. Any links to posts or threads on other message boards Any links to personal blogs Any news heard on the radio that does not have a link to an audio vault or podcast Any news seen on television that does not have a link to online video Any news spread by word of mouth
      Additionally, certain sources may be be blacklisted due to poor credentials, clear traffic-mongering etc. Blacklisted sources will be posted here. 
      Thank you for your co-operation and please PM the Administrator or Moderators if you have any questions, concerns or suggestions regarding this forum.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

canuckleface77

(Speculation) Are Flyers and Canucks perfetc trade partners?

Recommended Posts

Flyers look absolutely horrible right now, especially tonight against NJ. They have some pieces that could fit well in Vancouver. Yes, I'm aware they have Bryz and his ridiculous contract but there are buyout options, and don't tell me Ed Snider doesn't have the cash to do it. He wants to win, plain and simple.

All this being said, what do you think makes sense between the two teams? What are some realistic options?

Would Schneider, Raymond, Booth, plus a 1st fetch us Simmonds and both Schenn's?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not much point in them trading for Lu this season. Let them buy-out bryzgalov after this season and then let's get a trade done. He will still count towards this season's cap if they buy him out right now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hell no Flyers would never do this.

Simmonds, primed 20+ goal scorer, and gives plenty of grit. They brought both Schenn brothers in for a reason and they wont give up on them that easily. Absolutely horrible trade for the Flyers.

Simmonds will cost as least Kassian and a pick

Both Schenn Brothers, expect at least Tanev, Jensen, Edler, Schneider in the mix

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Math doesn't work. You're dealing about 10 mill in Cap, & getting that much back(for next yr's 64.3, it doesn't help). If we're dealing one of our excellent tandem, the return should include Cap-compliance for next year. In other words, we get younger players(cheaper, but with serious upside), whilst dealing a couple onerous contracts.

Agreed though, potential with these 2 clubs doing a deal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hell no Flyers would never do this.

Simmonds, primed 20+ goal scorer, and gives plenty of grit. They brought both Schenn brothers in for a reason and they wont give up on them that easily. Absolutely horrible trade for the Flyers.

Simmonds will cost as least Kassian and a pick

Both Schenn Brothers, expect at least Tanev, Jensen, Edler, Schneider in the mix

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hell no Flyers would never do this.

Simmonds, primed 20+ goal scorer, and gives plenty of grit. They brought both Schenn brothers in for a reason and they wont give up on them that easily. Absolutely horrible trade for the Flyers.

Simmonds will cost as least Kassian and a pick

Both Schenn Brothers, expect at least Tanev, Jensen, Edler, Schneider in the mix

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

edler or Schneider could interest them.

If we get any of their forwards I would want B.Schenn. I didnt even notice Couturier tonight, and we need help now, Couturier will be good but doesnt fit our need for offense now.

they have 3 bigger physical wingers: Hartnell, Simmonds and Voracek. It would be nice to get one of Simmonds or Voracek but that looks like a dream, even B. Schenn

Sounds like Philly fans on HFboards are open to moving Coburn and couturier though

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hell no Flyers would never do this.

Simmonds, primed 20+ goal scorer, and gives plenty of grit. They brought both Schenn brothers in for a reason and they wont give up on them that easily. Absolutely horrible trade for the Flyers.

Simmonds will cost as least Kassian and a pick

Both Schenn Brothers, expect at least Tanev, Jensen, Edler, Schneider in the mix

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't really see them as good partners. Edler is the most valuable piece to Philly. But we would need a quality defenseman back....which defeats the purpose of the deal for Philly.

Maybe something around Schneider for Couturier is Philly decided to abandon the Bryzgalov experiment....and AV/Gillis decided to go back with Luongo.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

how about luongo, raymond and edler - gives them their goaltending, top defenseman and a bit of offense for

brayden schenn, simmonds and bryzgalov - they get to dump bryzgalov, but have to give up a lot of offense

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't really see them as good partners. Edler is the most valuable piece to Philly. But we would need a quality defenseman back....which defeats the purpose of the deal for Philly.

Maybe something around Schneider for Couturier is Philly decided to abandon the Bryzgalov experiment....and AV/Gillis decided to go back with Luongo.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.