Mr.DirtyDangles Posted March 14, 2013 Share Posted March 14, 2013 Im guessing that if the nhl addressed this , it would be a pretty huge scandal .. These guys are just human , so I understand a little retribution . I just don't think that holding a grudge is ok if your a ref . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alt kilgore Posted March 14, 2013 Share Posted March 14, 2013 Not holding them up as shining examples of virtuous behavior, just recognizing it for what it is and trying to say that it was preventable, and that it should have been prevented. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aladeen Posted March 14, 2013 Share Posted March 14, 2013 Burrows had been ranting about this to his teammates through the course of the game, I find it incomprehensible that for something this 'offside' to have occurred before and during the game that the club officials were not alerted to it and well aware of the situation by games end. It would have been on the club, ie. Gillis, to handle Burrows dealing with the media; it's on Gillis either way, by commission or omission, which is probably why, if I remember right, Gillis did put it on himself when asked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUPERTKBD Posted March 14, 2013 Share Posted March 14, 2013 Burrows had been ranting about this to his teammates through the course of the game, I find it incomprehensible that for something this 'offside' to have occurred before and during the game that the club officials were not alerted to it and well aware of the situation by games end. It would have been on the club, ie. Gillis, to handle Burrows dealing with the media; it's on Gillis either way, by commission or omission, which is probably why, if I remember right, Gillis did put it on himself when asked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Salmonberries Posted March 14, 2013 Share Posted March 14, 2013 If I'm wrong I'm wrong. The only person I can find in my search that Burrows actually told was the backup goalie Andrew Raycroft. I guess Burrows internalized it and then let it blurt when it counted then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Salmonberries Posted March 14, 2013 Share Posted March 14, 2013 I want to lay off but you keep digging yourself deeper. Not only was there was not much chance that Gillis could have had time to run down from the press box and intercept Burrows before the press interviews in the locker room, but more importantly, HE WOULDN'T HAVE EVEN KNOWN until it was all over. Burrows himself said in the interview, i forget exactly, that he wasn't even going to mention it, but the fact that it cost the team the win and was unfair to his fellow team mates he felt he had to. He made that decision to speak right there with the cameras running. So how was Gillis to know this was even going on? No one knew. They only uncovered that grainy video of Auger talking to Burrows before the game the next day. So the only way it could have been prevented is if Burrows had held back his emotions in the heat of the moment. But how can you blame him for that? I challenge any of us to act differently in that situation. Back to the police allegory that you brought up. Is it also ok for some shop keeper on a corrupt policeman's beat to just pay up for his protection money? Because by not speaking up he is "preventing" the backlash that will come to him from that policeman in the future? I guess in some ways you are right. But I for one cannot criticize someone for doing what they feel is the morally right thing to do at the time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUPERTKBD Posted March 14, 2013 Share Posted March 14, 2013 If I'm wrong I'm wrong. The only person I can find in my search that Burrows actually told was the backup goalie Andrew Raycroft. I guess Burrows internalized it and then let it blurt when it counted then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Salmonberries Posted March 14, 2013 Share Posted March 14, 2013 And to think, all these years I've been holding this against Gillis. Sorry Mike. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hairy Kneel Posted March 14, 2013 Share Posted March 14, 2013 Put one ref upstairs to review video automatically of dives and emBellys, he can also review goals while he's at it..plus one less body floating around the busy rink. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Salmonberries Posted March 14, 2013 Share Posted March 14, 2013 Put one ref upstairs to review video automatically of dives and emBellys, he can also review goals while he's at it..plus one less body floating around the busy rink. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
disisdayear Posted March 14, 2013 Share Posted March 14, 2013 Burrows had been ranting about this to his teammates through the course of the game, I find it incomprehensible that for something this 'offside' to have occurred before and during the game that the club officials were not alerted to it and well aware of the situation by games end. It would have been on the club, ie. Gillis, to handle Burrows dealing with the media; it's on Gillis either way, by commission or omission, which is probably why, if I remember right, Gillis did put it on himself when asked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bertuzzipunch Posted March 14, 2013 Share Posted March 14, 2013 Hes absolutly right, burrows will always be targeted. He will never get the benefit of the doubt no matter what and whenever he gets crosschecked in the back that 90% of the refs would call a penalty the canucks will never benefit and will never go on the pp for it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THERETOOL Posted March 14, 2013 Author Share Posted March 14, 2013 Hes absolutly right, burrows will always be targeted. He will never get the benefit of the doubt no matter what and whenever he gets crosschecked in the back that 90% of the refs would call a penalty the canucks will never benefit and will never go on the pp for it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
404error Posted March 14, 2013 Share Posted March 14, 2013 Maybe the Canucks just need to set up a one timer and instead of putting it on net, it could be deflected into the face of a biased official? Do it as often as necessary until they get the point. If it happens ten games in a row, it happens ten games in a row. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-DLC- Posted March 14, 2013 Share Posted March 14, 2013 The whole (BS) climate of "can't speak poorly about the officials" is garbage and needs changing. In what other situation can you not call out someone on the job? Of course you can, it's how corruption is held at bay and accountability is demanded. The untouchable club of officials has to start answering for their actions or the abuse of power will continue to go unchecked and run rampant. The ol' boys club needs to be a thing of the past. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THERETOOL Posted March 14, 2013 Author Share Posted March 14, 2013 The whole (BS) climate of "can't speak poorly about the officials" is garbage and needs changing. In what other situation can you not call out someone on the job? Of course you can, it's how corruption is held at bay and accountability is demanded. The untouchable club of officials has to start answering for their actions or the abuse of power will continue to go unchecked and run rampant. The ol' boys club needs to be a thing of the past. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.