Jump to content

Welcome to canucks.com Vancouver Canucks homepage

Photo

[Trade] Toronto - Anaheim


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
35 replies to this topic

#31 elvis15

elvis15

    Canucks Hall-of-Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 23,949 posts
  • Joined: 27-February 07

Posted 15 March 2013 - 02:11 PM

Maybe for some, but not for all on the CDC...it could very well be that many of us on the CDC like myself are musing, "hmmmmm, could very well have been a decent pickup for the Canucks..."...nothing more, nothing less.

Sure, but then you weren't one of the ones saying 'frackkkkk' either.

c3c9e9.pnganimalhousesig.jpg

If this team lets go of Sang he will burn this team next year. 

 


#32 Bob.Loblaw

Bob.Loblaw

    Canucks Franchise Player

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,192 posts
  • Joined: 24-November 09

Posted 15 March 2013 - 02:46 PM

I'd rather not waste a roster spot on Steckel. I'd rather make a significant move than a couple useless ones.


Anaheim is what, 20-3-3? I believe I heard that they're third last in the league in faceoff percentage. Faceoffs don't tell that much of a story.


Think bigger, folks. Stop pondering why MG isn't picking up any person that becomes available.


Why do you think they acquired Dave Steckel?

#33 marleau_12

marleau_12

    Canucks Franchise Player

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 12,286 posts
  • Joined: 03-April 04

Posted 15 March 2013 - 09:48 PM

Why do you think they acquired Dave Steckel?

I'm just saying, with or without his faceoff ability, they're competing at an elite level (even with a low faceoff winning percentage).
Posted Image

#34 Special Ed

Special Ed

    Canucks Second-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,677 posts
  • Joined: 09-February 09

Posted 15 March 2013 - 09:57 PM

I'm just saying, with or without his faceoff ability, they're competing at an elite level (even with a low faceoff winning percentage).


Looks like Hodgson is doing better then Kesler so far.

Just like I predicted :P

If you like looking at statistics to determine who's better, you're just a casual fan.

2.41 season GAA isn't very impressive. Let's not get into playoffs and his SV%.

Cory Schneider is the next Patrick Roy.


#35 Canucks_Hockey_101

Canucks_Hockey_101

    Canucks Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,195 posts
  • Joined: 05-November 12

Posted 16 March 2013 - 12:21 AM

Looks like Hodgson is doing better then Kesler so far.

Just like I predicted :P


Yeah. Love to have Kassian on the team but Hodgson could have flourished in a Canucks uniform. Total mismanagement there. Hopefully that doesn't happen again. Here we're talking Neely all over again.

#36 marleau_12

marleau_12

    Canucks Franchise Player

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 12,286 posts
  • Joined: 03-April 04

Posted 16 March 2013 - 08:49 PM

Looks like Hodgson is doing better then Kesler so far.

Just like I predicted :P

Haha, man that's ironic. I only remembered that quote was in my sig when I made that post you replied to.
Posted Image




Canucks.com is the official Web site of The Vancouver Canucks. The Vancouver Canucks and Canucks.com are trademarks of The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership.  NHL and the word mark and image of the Stanley Cup are registered trademarks and the NHL Shield and NHL Conference logos are trademarks of the National Hockey League. All NHL logos and marks and NHL team logos and marks as well as all other proprietary materials depicted herein are the property of the NHL and the respective NHL teams and may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of NHL Enterprises, L.P.  Copyright © 2009 The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership and the National Hockey League.  All Rights Reserved.