Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

AllCanucksAllTheTime

[Proposal] Van/Tor & Van/Ana

9 posts in this topic

Vancouver / Anaheim

To Ana: Booth, Garrison, Ebbett, 5th rd.

To Van: Ryan, Steckel

Anaheim won't have enough money to resign Bobby Ryan now with the two 8yr deal they game Getzlaf & Perry. Plus Ryan is a goal scorer that can play with the Sedins, and Steckel is a great faceoff guy for the 3rd line.

Vancouver / Toronto

To Tor: Luongo

To Van: Kulemin, Blacker, 2nd rd.

Toronto still needs stability in net, Lou gives them that. With the return of Lupul, Frattin can move down to the 2nd line with Kadri & JVR leaving no room for Kulemin. And Jesse Blacker is a prospect defenseman who can start making the transition to the NHL.

THEN: We sign Brent Johnson to back up Schneids.

***Given Booth's injury this trade will probably have to wait until the offseason***

Projected Lineups:

Sedin - Sedin - Ryan

Kulemin - Kesler - Burrows

Higgins - Steckel - Kassian

Weise - Lapierre - Hansen

Edler - Hamhuis

Bieksa - Tanev

Ballard - Blacker

Schneider

Johnson

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

if we made it a 1st to Anaheim they might listen. maybe. I think we would have to give a top prospect as well. the 2nd trade is not bad.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I'm just assuming Garrison would. I personally never liked the signing. Not for the amount of money he got.

Anaheim's second line is getting old. Selanne and Koivu are about to retire, and so are a few of their D-Men. Lookng back I guess Ebbett and a 5th is a little low, giving a first is too much unles we get a 3rd back.. Maybe try this?

To Ana: Garrison, Booth, Ebbett, 1st rd.

To Van: Ryan, Steckel, 3rd rd.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Vancouver / Anaheim

To Ana: Booth, Garrison, Ebbett, 5th rd.

To Van: Ryan, Steckel

Anaheim won't have enough money to resign Bobby Ryan now with the two 8yr deal they game Getzlaf & Perry. Plus Ryan is a goal scorer that can play with the Sedins, and Steckel is a great faceoff guy for the 3rd line.

...

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What I meant is that they can't afford to tie up all that salary in one player. But getting a top 4 d-man and a 2nd line pwf with offensive upside for the same price would help balance their scoring.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Anaheim doesn't accept, and I don't see the second deal as being that desirable on the Canucks end.

I'll try to do this as unbiased as possible with deals that are more realistic.

To Vancouver: Bobby Ryan

To Anaheim: 1st, Raymond, Schroeder

To Vancouver: Matt Frattin, Ben Scrivens, Joe Colborne

To Toronto: Luongo, 3rd

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Since the year is all over the place right now that pick could be high or low.. maybe a conditional 3rd or 4th depending on how high it is. But I like that trade.

I like the second one for the most part, just concerned with the fact that in 3 years we could be facing another ridiculous goalie controversy. Not that it matters as long as we win games, I'm just sayin.

If the Ryan trade went through I still say move Booth for picks.. His contract is too much considering the production we get out of him.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

SO many things wrong with the Ducks proposal.

1) Ryan is signed for 2 more years beyond this season, so resigning him isn't an immediate concern

2) If it was a concern, why would they ship out a combined $6.2M caphit (Ryan and Steckel) to take on a $9.425 cap hit (Garrison, Booth, Ebbett)

3) Ryan is by far the best player in this deal. Anaheim gets a lot worse by doing this deal. Booth Garrison and Ebbet COMBINED couldn't replace the points from losing Ryan.

4) Booth is out long term. Why would Anaheim trade for a guy that has had injury woes for pretty much his whole career and has no timetable for a return from this one?

5) IF the Ducks were shopping Ryan Im sure that 28 other teams would be able to offer a much better package than 2 overpaid under performing guys and a borderline AHLer

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.