grandmaster Posted March 20, 2013 Share Posted March 20, 2013 People here who don't want iggy are ABSOLUTELY NUTS and obviously haven't watched him play this year. We won't get him but it would be amazing if we did. He's been on fire this year and is hitting, battling, fighting even and scoring. This guy would be fantastic on our team. Again. 99% chance it won't happen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
komodo1970 Posted March 20, 2013 Share Posted March 20, 2013 he's going east, they aren't trading him to a divisional rival Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lonny_Bohonos_14 Posted March 20, 2013 Share Posted March 20, 2013 Agreed. He would be that power forward this team hasn't had since Bertuzzi Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heretic Posted March 20, 2013 Share Posted March 20, 2013 NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO!!! If we give the Lames Jensen or Gaunce or Kassian to get this old floater, im gonna be pissed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghostsof1915 Posted March 20, 2013 Share Posted March 20, 2013 No to trading a 1st or a 2nd rounder this year for a rental. And a big no on trading our good prospects. If Calgary was ok with a 2nd rounder in 2014, a 1st in 2015, Schroeder, and Ballard. And we get Iggy and Tyler Wotherspoon, then I'd do that deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noheart Posted March 20, 2013 Share Posted March 20, 2013 Too bad San Jose is asking a first and a top prospect, on top of Vancouver being HATED to the core by Clowe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vicky Posted March 20, 2013 Share Posted March 20, 2013 Canucks should just deal Cory for him and be done with this saga. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dogbyte Posted March 20, 2013 Share Posted March 20, 2013 there's no chance he comes here. Its pitts or nothing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dogbyte Posted March 20, 2013 Share Posted March 20, 2013 Schneider for Iginla Calgary flames would then have two great red head goalies Sedin Sedin Iginla Raymond Kesler Burrows Hansen Higgins Kassian Pinizzotto Lapierre Weise Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dogbyte Posted March 20, 2013 Share Posted March 20, 2013 Kunitz Crosby Dupuis Neal Malkin Iginla Not bad... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SergioMomesso Posted March 20, 2013 Share Posted March 20, 2013 I think Iginla would be Crosby's winger since they played together in the Olympics. Boston is interested too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SergioMomesso Posted March 20, 2013 Share Posted March 20, 2013 Dupuis is relentless on the forecheck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ForsbergTheGreat Posted March 20, 2013 Share Posted March 20, 2013 After listening to flames radio, Flames expect a late 1st/early second, a NHL ready prospect (not necessarily high end), and a conditional pick in 2014 depending on him re-signing. They don't feel the have much bargaining power as Iginla has the power to veto any offer, Much like the Nash deal, he decides which team he wants to go to. Flames feel they could get a huge return for him if it was an open market and a bidding war could happen, but they are restricted to the teams Iginla decides on. Flames can either get something in return (even be it a smaller return) for him or have him walk and get nothing. The real question is where does Iginla want to play. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nux4lyfe Posted March 20, 2013 Share Posted March 20, 2013 That's like Trevor Linden playing for the Lames, just don't see it.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jester13 Posted March 20, 2013 Share Posted March 20, 2013 I'd give up a 2nd and a prospect like Sweatt or something. People do know who we are talking about right? Jerome Iginla... with him in the lineup and Kesler back for the playoffs this team could surprise a lot of people and teams. Our D is starting to play better and our goalies are too. Iggy would bring heart, grit, determination, toughness, and scoring. No brainer IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
apollo Posted March 20, 2013 Share Posted March 20, 2013 That's like Trevor Linden playing for the Lames, just don't see it.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cdubuya Posted March 20, 2013 Share Posted March 20, 2013 Well from the sounds of it Iginla has Vancouver on his short list. I'm not surprised. The fit is there and he's from Western Canada... I know we hate each other but after playing us for years I'm sure he respects our organization. So if this is true and we did trade for him he may resign for a few years at a cheaper rate. I dont think people here truly appreciate just how much value he would add to our team. He's a goal scorer. A great one. He's tough as nails. He's that true Canadian hockey player we haven't had for years. I think adding him would make us a cup team... And if he resigned that would just be a bonus. He's just not that much older than Schneider... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CB007 Posted March 20, 2013 Share Posted March 20, 2013 If Iginla goes to LA, or Pitts, or Boston... the season is it's done. Whoever lands him might start planning the parade. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nux4lyfe Posted March 20, 2013 Share Posted March 20, 2013 I don't think it's much of the question that no one wants him here, of course he's a great player..but the probability of that happening is low albeit as a rental. I don't see the Flames trading their Captain to a div rival, We might be high on Iggy's list but prob low on Feaster's..plus what can we really offer? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CB007 Posted March 20, 2013 Share Posted March 20, 2013 After listening to flames radio, Flames expect a late 1st/early second, a NHL ready prospect (not necessarily high end), and a conditional pick in 2014 depending on him re-signing. They don't feel the have much bargaining power as Iginla has the power to veto any offer, Much like the Nash deal, he decides which team he wants to go to. Flames feel they could get a huge return for him if it was an open market and a bidding war could happen, but they are restricted to the teams Iginla decides on. Flames can either get something in return (even be it a smaller return) for him or have him walk and get nothing. The real question is where does Iginla want to play. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.