Jump to content

Welcome to canucks.com Vancouver Canucks homepage

Photo
- - - - -

Team Toughness - How do we compare against other teams?


  • Please log in to reply
58 replies to this topic

#1 LuongoMVP

LuongoMVP

    K-Wing Prospect

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 5 posts
  • Joined: 14-April 07

Posted 24 March 2013 - 02:18 AM

Saw Jordan Nolan taking liberties on our Captain today and I am disappointed by the lack of team toughness we have to address when other teams run our star players. The bigger problem is that it's not an isolated incident.

I know AV preaches to play between the whistles, etc, but that does not address the issue. I'm not suggesting we need someone to fight Jordan Nolan, but our team should hit legally back or increase the physicality on their skilled players. I think our team lacks the team toughness and intimidation, which is much needed to go far in the playoffs.

If an incident like that happened to Boston, Toronto or Ottawa, you know full well that you will need to answer to someone like Thorton, Orr or Neil. What are your thoughts?

On a related note, I've always longed for a legitimate top 6-9 power forward like a Ryan Clowe or Chris Stewart on this team who will keep others in line, and also have some skill to back it up. Perhaps Kassian can grow into one of these players, some day.

Edited by LuongoMVP, 24 March 2013 - 02:23 AM.

  • 1

#2 ButterBean

ButterBean

    Canucks Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,228 posts
  • Joined: 23-February 09

Posted 24 March 2013 - 02:45 AM

This is why MG traded for Kassian, to increase team toughness. In my opinion, he's built perfectly for the Sedin line, while he
's still raw in his defensive game and his offense a bit. I don't really feel threatened by LA that much. While they do have big bodies who can hit well, I don't feel like there's guys on their team who can really take liberties with us and they don't have many great fighters. The problem is other teams stars don't get knocked around so easily and ours need to be protected, but Burrows is definitely not the answer, he fights like a pansy. Boston, I do have worries about though if we were to meet in the finals again, which is highly unlikely.

I don't think anyone on our team can handle Lucic, yet alone McQuaid or Thornton. Other teams in the West I think we can measure up though. While it isn't our biggest problem right now, I'd be looking at Morrow or Clowe right now which could be unlikely but it seems like there is very few options for increase our top 9 toughness.
  • 0

#3 Kassian's Face

Kassian's Face

    Comets Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 682 posts
  • Joined: 08-April 11

Posted 24 March 2013 - 05:34 AM

I think you would be hard pressed to find a team that gets pushed around more then the Canucks.

There are 30 teams in the NHL and 29 of them would never have put up with Nolan manhandling their Captains.
  • 0

#4 BedBeats™2.0

BedBeats™2.0

    Canucks All-Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 18,310 posts
  • Joined: 04-March 03

Posted 24 March 2013 - 05:41 AM

Funny, the Canucks got a bit bigger, which everyone wanted.

Even so, i always thought they were still tough. This season, they are not certainly tough to play against.

Because our superstars get mistreated, and some goon doesnt flatten them on the next shift does not mean we lack toughness. Its an indifference that is a team rule handed down by management.

MG must go ape that he has tried to change the culture of the team for favourable calls, but gets no balance in how the team are assessed penalties.
  • 0

Posted Image

Henrik breaking records.Kes approving.


#5 Kassian's Face

Kassian's Face

    Comets Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 682 posts
  • Joined: 08-April 11

Posted 24 March 2013 - 06:30 AM

Nolan stood over Henrik for quite a while pushing him around. Last time I checked Henrik wasn't the only player on the ice. No one stepped in. Unless this team starts playing like a team, we are completely screwed going into the playoffs.

Keith hurts a Sedin, no retribution, Nolan hurts Henrik, no retribution and these are supposed to be our rivals?

Refs aernt going to give us fair calls. They havent for years if you think they are going to start this year for some reason your delusional. And we cant score on the PP anyways.

We can barely score, our defense practically wraps up the puck every game as they gift it the opposition time and time again.

Oh yeah and we let anyone, even our most hated rivals, walk all over us without fear of anything, because nothing is going to happen. No penalty and no team mate stepping up to protect their captain.

I dont see a stanley cup winning formula in there, do you?

But hey, we didn't take a penalty so its alright.

Edited by Kassian's Face, 24 March 2013 - 06:32 AM.

  • 0

#6 GarthButcher

GarthButcher

    Comets Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 901 posts
  • Joined: 13-April 07

Posted 24 March 2013 - 06:44 AM

*
POPULAR

I almost never post on here, because people are so harsh about topics that have been discussed before, but I felt pretty strongly about this subject after watching the game last night, and I saw the topic, so here goes:

I live in a time zone where I can't watch too many games. Yesterday was a nice exception.

I watched the game with my wife, who fell asleep half way through the second. After the game, she asked if I enjoyed it, since she said I sounded angry a lot while watching it.

I'm not a guy who gets angry if my team loses. If you do, I don't think sports is a healthy pass time. But what I get angry about when I watch sports, is the cheap shots, diving, faking...basically the unsportsmanlike stuff.

Don't get me wrong...I grew up playing hockey, and I was a stay-at-home physical defencemen. I was never afraid of getting dirty. I actually really enjoyed that part of the game.

Also, growing up watching the Canucks, I cheered for Garth, Gino, and all the tough guys the Canucks had on the team over the years. When you went to a game (for 5 or 10 bucks btw), at first you thought they might win, but by the end you just hoped that they would have a few fights and show a good effort. Usually they didn't disappoint.

Obviously the Bertuzzi incident changed a lot about the organization, as times were changing in the NHL. The league was trying to sanitize its image, while the Canucks had to get out from under the weight of that scandal. The Canucks shifted away from their grittier past, while the league worked to try to give off an image of being "clean."

The incidents where I got angry last night were: the cross check to Hank, Tanev getting hammered from behind by Penner, Burrows getting cranked from behind (and mugged throughout the game, except that one was just too obvious to not call), and various runs on Schneids.

Physical hockey is a simple game. It's tit for tat. They take a shot, you hit back, and vice versa. The moment that the other team doesn't respond to your shot, you take a harder shot and they lose face. That's how you win.

When I see these incidents, I wait for the Canucks response. When Hank gets hammered, someone has to hammer the perpetrator. Someone has to take out Penner. I keep thinking that they're taking a number, and Sestito or someone will come get them. But it never happens. Bieksa talks a lot, but doesn't go after too many people. This is a problem. The team does not stand up for itself.

If discipline is going to be taken over by the league, and the tit for tat is gone (yeah right), then it has to be even handed. As it stands right now, certain teams know that they won't get suspensions, while other teams will for the same thing. All of those incidents yesterday were much worse than any Edler or Hansen hit (like these guys are cheap shot artists...what a joke).

The Canucks are hamstrung right now, because they're not built to be cheap, and the moment they push the line at all, the league hammers them.

If players from Chi, NY, Bos, LA, etc. know that the most they're gonna get is a couple of minutes; no punches in the face (or worse), long suspensions, etc, they're gonna keep doing this stuff. Who wouldn't if it could give you an edge.

There's a lot of hollow talk about how horrible the NHL is. But I'm getting to the point where that logo enrages me. The NHL stands for corruption, favouritism, and a general lack of integrity. It's becoming a BS league, that's almost not worth watching.

I've been a Canucks fan for 30 years, but I'm torn. I love the team, and I love to watch them win, but I'm growing to hate the league. The hypocracy, the inconsistency, and the corruption.

It's getting to the point where the frustration is spoiling my enjoying the games.

I was a physical player, and I love the rough stuff. I loved the old culture of the Canucks, and when they combined that work ethic and toughness with the right balance of skill in 94, it was magic. They came so close to taking down a champion in waiting.

But don't think the team could have made it there without Diduck, Odjick, Hunter, Momesso, and the like. They weren't pushovers by any stretch.

Now we've gotta fight other teams and the league. I don't really know what the answer is, and it's making me doubt being a fan.

I'll always love the Canucks, but I'm beginning to hate the NHL.

Edited by GarthButcher, 24 March 2013 - 06:47 AM.

  • 16
Posted Image

The immortal Garth...awaiting his place in the ring of honour!

#7 BedBeats™2.0

BedBeats™2.0

    Canucks All-Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 18,310 posts
  • Joined: 04-March 03

Posted 24 March 2013 - 06:44 AM

Nolan stood over Henrik for quite a while pushing him around. Last time I checked Henrik wasn't the only player on the ice. No one stepped in. Unless this team starts playing like a team, we are completely screwed going into the playoffs.

Keith hurts a Sedin, no retribution, Nolan hurts Henrik, no retribution and these are supposed to be our rivals?

Refs aernt going to give us fair calls. They havent for years if you think they are going to start this year for some reason your delusional. And we cant score on the PP anyways.

We can barely score, our defense practically wraps up the puck every game as they gift it the opposition time and time again.

Oh yeah and we let anyone, even our most hated rivals, walk all over us without fear of anything, because nothing is going to happen. No penalty and no team mate stepping up to protect their captain.

I dont see a stanley cup winning formula in there, do you?

But hey, we didn't take a penalty so its alright.


The lack of goalscoring underscores that the team could get away with mucking it up and looking for payback. As it is right now with AV rolling 4 lines, its dicey to really get involved like we see with other teams. Along with the underachievement in goal scoring, our PK is a former shadow of itself.

You also forget that Hank and Danny (especially Danny, people overlook how often he is manhandled and played hard against) are used to it.

I like that they have been more chirpy and are doling out bodychecks, becuase they can actually get away with it now.

But sorry folks, with important points to be won in a ridiculously close conference, i probably would be not risk taking on ice as far as after whistle happenings.

Now if the team were healthy, we might be having a very different chat altogether,
  • 1

Posted Image

Henrik breaking records.Kes approving.


#8 Kassian's Face

Kassian's Face

    Comets Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 682 posts
  • Joined: 08-April 11

Posted 24 March 2013 - 07:07 AM

The lack of goalscoring underscores that the team could get away with mucking it up and looking for payback. As it is right now with AV rolling 4 lines, its dicey to really get involved like we see with other teams. Along with the underachievement in goal scoring, our PK is a former shadow of itself.

You also forget that Hank and Danny (especially Danny, people overlook how often he is manhandled and played hard against) are used to it.

I like that they have been more chirpy and are doling out bodychecks, becuase they can actually get away with it now.

But sorry folks, with important points to be won in a ridiculously close conference, i probably would be not risk taking on ice as far as after whistle happenings.

Now if the team were healthy, we might be having a very different chat altogether,


Please read the post above yours. You can always tell the fans who played sports and those that have not.

If we play like this I pray we do not go to the playoffs. As of right now if we played LA in the playoffs, we would take so many injuries that our next season is dead too, and then the window will be closing and players wont sign at discounts to play here.

At the current pace Henriks Iron Man run is in dire jeopordy and its 100% because of being soft.

Like you said, its a close conference, and everyone wants to win. We are showing 29 other teams that we are not a threat and can be easily beat up till we have no roster left. If we knew LA was a soft team and we could do whatever we want without fear of reprecussion, we would do it so that we could win.

It sure is a good thing the Sedins can get beat up time and time again because no one is fighting for them and they will continue to get beat up.

LA lost, but do you think they are all crying about it? No they made a statement that we cannot beat them in a playoff series.
  • 0

#9 debluvscanucks

debluvscanucks

    Canucks Hall-of-Famer

  • Super Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 23,029 posts
  • Joined: 19-February 08

Posted 24 March 2013 - 07:14 AM

You see what happens though?....our guys are booted, they look for any excuse to suspend Canucks. We simply can't afford to lose any more players.

We beat them, and they can hang their sorry heads on the way out because their goonery and whining did nothing to help their game.

Sure, I agree (and like it when they do fight back)....but it just doesn't work out for us. I think we've had a good balance of push back and toughness this year. That's the damn refs job - what a pool of slimy fish that allow that to happen, yet a bump behind the net that a 10 year girl with a learn to skate cart could withstand has our player tossed.

Drew Doughty, this whine's for you. Cheers. Enjoy the points your team didn't get last night. :)

Edit (re above) How did losing make a winning statement for them?...not quite making that connection.
  • 2

Posted Image


#10 Kassian's Face

Kassian's Face

    Comets Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 682 posts
  • Joined: 08-April 11

Posted 24 March 2013 - 07:20 AM

You see what happens though?....our guys are booted, they look for any excuse to suspend Canucks.

We beat them, and they can hang their sorry heads on the way out because their goonery and whining did nothing to help their game.

Sure, I agree (and like it when they do fight back)....but it just doesn't work out for us. I think we've had a good balance of push back and toughness this year. That's the damn refs job - what a pool of slimy fish that allow that to happen, yet a bump behind the net that a 10 year girl with a learn to skate cart could withstand has our player tossed.

Drew Doughty, this whine's for you. Cheers. Enjoy the points your team didn't get last night. :)

How did losing make a winning statement for them?...not quite getting that correlation ^...of course they're crying about it.


Not a winning statement. But a statement none the less. They can beat us and push us and out grind us and the refs won't do anything and they can out physical play us by a crap ton. In short that we have no chance against them in a playoff series as we currently stand. And its not a roster thing, its a mentality thing. They only got off 20 shots that game. If we played as hard as they did we would have won by alot more then 1 goal. Schneider is the ONLY reason we were able to hold them off for those 2 points.

EDIT: Wanted to add a link to the LA boards so you can see how many of the fans thought it was a good game and were robbed by Schneider and how they showed us up and what not. http://letsgokings.c...-443391-38.html

Edited by Kassian's Face, 24 March 2013 - 07:26 AM.

  • 0

#11 Raffi Torres's Smirk

Raffi Torres's Smirk

    Comets Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 406 posts
  • Joined: 24-January 13

Posted 24 March 2013 - 07:30 AM

I thought Hank actually has been playing with a lot more grit than normal, especially in that LA game. Even Raymond's been finishing his checks. I agree that overall there could be a bit more pushback but I'm not as concerned about it as I was last year.

As long as Tostito and Pinner are getting regular shifts, and Alberts sticks around, I think we can hold our own. From what I've seen from Pinner, he looks like the closest thing to filling in the hole left by Torres leaving.
  • 0

#12 BedBeats™2.0

BedBeats™2.0

    Canucks All-Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 18,310 posts
  • Joined: 04-March 03

Posted 24 March 2013 - 07:32 AM

Please read the post above yours. You can always tell the fans who played sports and those that have not.

If we play like this I pray we do not go to the playoffs. As of right now if we played LA in the playoffs, we would take so many injuries that our next season is dead too, and then the window will be closing and players wont sign at discounts to play here.

At the current pace Henriks Iron Man run is in dire jeopordy and its 100% because of being soft.

Like you said, its a close conference, and everyone wants to win. We are showing 29 other teams that we are not a threat and can be easily beat up till we have no roster left. If we knew LA was a soft team and we could do whatever we want without fear of reprecussion, we would do it so that we could win.

It sure is a good thing the Sedins can get beat up time and time again because no one is fighting for them and they will continue to get beat up.

LA lost, but do you think they are all crying about it? No they made a statement that we cannot beat them in a playoff series.


Many folks here have played Hockey. Really has no bearing on the discussion.

And i most certainly read that post. It was thoughtful.

Worrying about the Sedins getting pushed around, well like i said, they are used to it, That is toughness in itself. It is absolutely nothing new, yet people are posting like this is just only starting to happen.

Its difficult to strike the balance, for every team in the NHL. Everybody is confused about the reffing and discipline. If the Canucks MO in this time in the league is to not overreact and keep that penalty box bare, then fine.

We will see what happens. There are other teams that take punishment as well without resorting to goonery. Ive just never really cared for it in this day and age where a league gets it wrong about how to better serve the skilled players.
  • 0

Posted Image

Henrik breaking records.Kes approving.


#13 Vansicle

Vansicle

    Canucks Third-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,402 posts
  • Joined: 24-August 09

Posted 24 March 2013 - 07:42 AM

They have abviously been told not to respond.

I don't know by whom, but they've been neutered.
They waive Volpatti in favor of Weisse, which indicates they have a preference for a guy who is marginally better in terms of offense. They aquire Sestito, who ia bigger and tougher than both put together. In his first game he yries to check everything that moves into next week AND get into a fight. As soon as the next game you see him start to let up on finishing checks, stops looking for the big hit.
Hank starts playing with an edge. Not backing down to hattasment. Gets into it in front of crease with any and everyone, plays with more anger/edge for a few games. Reverts to doormat mode.
If they're not being told to real it in, then they truly are a pack of domesticated felines, and deserve to get pushed around.
  • 0

no duh.

You win the internet, EOM.

#14 Dr. Hockey

Dr. Hockey

    Comets Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 440 posts
  • Joined: 24-August 09

Posted 24 March 2013 - 07:47 AM

I almost never post on here, because people are so harsh about topics that have been discussed before, but I felt pretty strongly about this subject after watching the game last night, and I saw the topic, so here goes:

I live in a time zone where I can't watch too many games. Yesterday was a nice exception.

I watched the game with my wife, who fell asleep half way through the second. After the game, she asked if I enjoyed it, since she said I sounded angry a lot while watching it.

I'm not a guy who gets angry if my team loses. If you do, I don't think sports is a healthy pass time. But what I get angry about when I watch sports, is the cheap shots, diving, faking...basically the unsportsmanlike stuff.

Don't get me wrong...I grew up playing hockey, and I was a stay-at-home physical defencemen. I was never afraid of getting dirty. I actually really enjoyed that part of the game.

Also, growing up watching the Canucks, I cheered for Garth, Gino, and all the tough guys the Canucks had on the team over the years. When you went to a game (for 5 or 10 bucks btw), at first you thought they might win, but by the end you just hoped that they would have a few fights and show a good effort. Usually they didn't disappoint.

Obviously the Bertuzzi incident changed a lot about the organization, as times were changing in the NHL. The league was trying to sanitize its image, while the Canucks had to get out from under the weight of that scandal. The Canucks shifted away from their grittier past, while the league worked to try to give off an image of being "clean."

The incidents where I got angry last night were: the cross check to Hank, Tanev getting hammered from behind by Penner, Burrows getting cranked from behind (and mugged throughout the game, except that one was just too obvious to not call), and various runs on Schneids.

Physical hockey is a simple game. It's tit for tat. They take a shot, you hit back, and vice versa. The moment that the other team doesn't respond to your shot, you take a harder shot and they lose face. That's how you win.

When I see these incidents, I wait for the Canucks response. When Hank gets hammered, someone has to hammer the perpetrator. Someone has to take out Penner. I keep thinking that they're taking a number, and Sestito or someone will come get them. But it never happens. Bieksa talks a lot, but doesn't go after too many people. This is a problem. The team does not stand up for itself.

If discipline is going to be taken over by the league, and the tit for tat is gone (yeah right), then it has to be even handed. As it stands right now, certain teams know that they won't get suspensions, while other teams will for the same thing. All of those incidents yesterday were much worse than any Edler or Hansen hit (like these guys are cheap shot artists...what a joke).

The Canucks are hamstrung right now, because they're not built to be cheap, and the moment they push the line at all, the league hammers them.

If players from Chi, NY, Bos, LA, etc. know that the most they're gonna get is a couple of minutes; no punches in the face (or worse), long suspensions, etc, they're gonna keep doing this stuff. Who wouldn't if it could give you an edge.

There's a lot of hollow talk about how horrible the NHL is. But I'm getting to the point where that logo enrages me. The NHL stands for corruption, favouritism, and a general lack of integrity. It's becoming a BS league, that's almost not worth watching.

I've been a Canucks fan for 30 years, but I'm torn. I love the team, and I love to watch them win, but I'm growing to hate the league. The hypocracy, the inconsistency, and the corruption.

It's getting to the point where the frustration is spoiling my enjoying the games.

I was a physical player, and I love the rough stuff. I loved the old culture of the Canucks, and when they combined that work ethic and toughness with the right balance of skill in 94, it was magic. They came so close to taking down a champion in waiting.

But don't think the team could have made it there without Diduck, Odjick, Hunter, Momesso, and the like. They weren't pushovers by any stretch.

Now we've gotta fight other teams and the league. I don't really know what the answer is, and it's making me doubt being a fan.

I'll always love the Canucks, but I'm beginning to hate the NHL.


OH! MY! GAWD!!!!!!
It's like you crawled into my brain and stole my thoughts. That's exactly how I feel. Except for the time zone and being a defence man it was a perfect, eloquent summation for my feelings!!!
Thanks!
  • 2

#15 Dr. Hockey

Dr. Hockey

    Comets Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 440 posts
  • Joined: 24-August 09

Posted 24 March 2013 - 07:47 AM

I almost never post on here, because people are so harsh about topics that have been discussed before, but I felt pretty strongly about this subject after watching the game last night, and I saw the topic, so here goes:

I live in a time zone where I can't watch too many games. Yesterday was a nice exception.

I watched the game with my wife, who fell asleep half way through the second. After the game, she asked if I enjoyed it, since she said I sounded angry a lot while watching it.

I'm not a guy who gets angry if my team loses. If you do, I don't think sports is a healthy pass time. But what I get angry about when I watch sports, is the cheap shots, diving, faking...basically the unsportsmanlike stuff.

Don't get me wrong...I grew up playing hockey, and I was a stay-at-home physical defencemen. I was never afraid of getting dirty. I actually really enjoyed that part of the game.

Also, growing up watching the Canucks, I cheered for Garth, Gino, and all the tough guys the Canucks had on the team over the years. When you went to a game (for 5 or 10 bucks btw), at first you thought they might win, but by the end you just hoped that they would have a few fights and show a good effort. Usually they didn't disappoint.

Obviously the Bertuzzi incident changed a lot about the organization, as times were changing in the NHL. The league was trying to sanitize its image, while the Canucks had to get out from under the weight of that scandal. The Canucks shifted away from their grittier past, while the league worked to try to give off an image of being "clean."

The incidents where I got angry last night were: the cross check to Hank, Tanev getting hammered from behind by Penner, Burrows getting cranked from behind (and mugged throughout the game, except that one was just too obvious to not call), and various runs on Schneids.

Physical hockey is a simple game. It's tit for tat. They take a shot, you hit back, and vice versa. The moment that the other team doesn't respond to your shot, you take a harder shot and they lose face. That's how you win.

When I see these incidents, I wait for the Canucks response. When Hank gets hammered, someone has to hammer the perpetrator. Someone has to take out Penner. I keep thinking that they're taking a number, and Sestito or someone will come get them. But it never happens. Bieksa talks a lot, but doesn't go after too many people. This is a problem. The team does not stand up for itself.

If discipline is going to be taken over by the league, and the tit for tat is gone (yeah right), then it has to be even handed. As it stands right now, certain teams know that they won't get suspensions, while other teams will for the same thing. All of those incidents yesterday were much worse than any Edler or Hansen hit (like these guys are cheap shot artists...what a joke).

The Canucks are hamstrung right now, because they're not built to be cheap, and the moment they push the line at all, the league hammers them.

If players from Chi, NY, Bos, LA, etc. know that the most they're gonna get is a couple of minutes; no punches in the face (or worse), long suspensions, etc, they're gonna keep doing this stuff. Who wouldn't if it could give you an edge.

There's a lot of hollow talk about how horrible the NHL is. But I'm getting to the point where that logo enrages me. The NHL stands for corruption, favouritism, and a general lack of integrity. It's becoming a BS league, that's almost not worth watching.

I've been a Canucks fan for 30 years, but I'm torn. I love the team, and I love to watch them win, but I'm growing to hate the league. The hypocracy, the inconsistency, and the corruption.

It's getting to the point where the frustration is spoiling my enjoying the games.

I was a physical player, and I love the rough stuff. I loved the old culture of the Canucks, and when they combined that work ethic and toughness with the right balance of skill in 94, it was magic. They came so close to taking down a champion in waiting.

But don't think the team could have made it there without Diduck, Odjick, Hunter, Momesso, and the like. They weren't pushovers by any stretch.

Now we've gotta fight other teams and the league. I don't really know what the answer is, and it's making me doubt being a fan.

I'll always love the Canucks, but I'm beginning to hate the NHL.


OH! MY! GAWD!!!!!!
It's like you crawled into my brain and stole my thoughts. That's exactly how I feel. Except for the time zone and being a defence man it was a perfect, eloquent summation for my feelings!!!
Thanks!
  • 0

#16 Dr. Hockey

Dr. Hockey

    Comets Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 440 posts
  • Joined: 24-August 09

Posted 24 March 2013 - 07:47 AM

I almost never post on here, because people are so harsh about topics that have been discussed before, but I felt pretty strongly about this subject after watching the game last night, and I saw the topic, so here goes:

I live in a time zone where I can't watch too many games. Yesterday was a nice exception.

I watched the game with my wife, who fell asleep half way through the second. After the game, she asked if I enjoyed it, since she said I sounded angry a lot while watching it.

I'm not a guy who gets angry if my team loses. If you do, I don't think sports is a healthy pass time. But what I get angry about when I watch sports, is the cheap shots, diving, faking...basically the unsportsmanlike stuff.

Don't get me wrong...I grew up playing hockey, and I was a stay-at-home physical defencemen. I was never afraid of getting dirty. I actually really enjoyed that part of the game.

Also, growing up watching the Canucks, I cheered for Garth, Gino, and all the tough guys the Canucks had on the team over the years. When you went to a game (for 5 or 10 bucks btw), at first you thought they might win, but by the end you just hoped that they would have a few fights and show a good effort. Usually they didn't disappoint.

Obviously the Bertuzzi incident changed a lot about the organization, as times were changing in the NHL. The league was trying to sanitize its image, while the Canucks had to get out from under the weight of that scandal. The Canucks shifted away from their grittier past, while the league worked to try to give off an image of being "clean."

The incidents where I got angry last night were: the cross check to Hank, Tanev getting hammered from behind by Penner, Burrows getting cranked from behind (and mugged throughout the game, except that one was just too obvious to not call), and various runs on Schneids.

Physical hockey is a simple game. It's tit for tat. They take a shot, you hit back, and vice versa. The moment that the other team doesn't respond to your shot, you take a harder shot and they lose face. That's how you win.

When I see these incidents, I wait for the Canucks response. When Hank gets hammered, someone has to hammer the perpetrator. Someone has to take out Penner. I keep thinking that they're taking a number, and Sestito or someone will come get them. But it never happens. Bieksa talks a lot, but doesn't go after too many people. This is a problem. The team does not stand up for itself.

If discipline is going to be taken over by the league, and the tit for tat is gone (yeah right), then it has to be even handed. As it stands right now, certain teams know that they won't get suspensions, while other teams will for the same thing. All of those incidents yesterday were much worse than any Edler or Hansen hit (like these guys are cheap shot artists...what a joke).

The Canucks are hamstrung right now, because they're not built to be cheap, and the moment they push the line at all, the league hammers them.

If players from Chi, NY, Bos, LA, etc. know that the most they're gonna get is a couple of minutes; no punches in the face (or worse), long suspensions, etc, they're gonna keep doing this stuff. Who wouldn't if it could give you an edge.

There's a lot of hollow talk about how horrible the NHL is. But I'm getting to the point where that logo enrages me. The NHL stands for corruption, favouritism, and a general lack of integrity. It's becoming a BS league, that's almost not worth watching.

I've been a Canucks fan for 30 years, but I'm torn. I love the team, and I love to watch them win, but I'm growing to hate the league. The hypocracy, the inconsistency, and the corruption.

It's getting to the point where the frustration is spoiling my enjoying the games.

I was a physical player, and I love the rough stuff. I loved the old culture of the Canucks, and when they combined that work ethic and toughness with the right balance of skill in 94, it was magic. They came so close to taking down a champion in waiting.

But don't think the team could have made it there without Diduck, Odjick, Hunter, Momesso, and the like. They weren't pushovers by any stretch.

Now we've gotta fight other teams and the league. I don't really know what the answer is, and it's making me doubt being a fan.

I'll always love the Canucks, but I'm beginning to hate the NHL.


OH! MY! GAWD!!!!!!
It's like you crawled into my brain and stole my thoughts. That's exactly how I feel. Except for the time zone and being a defence man it was a perfect, eloquent summation for my feelings!!!
Thanks!
  • 0

#17 Kassian's Face

Kassian's Face

    Comets Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 682 posts
  • Joined: 08-April 11

Posted 24 March 2013 - 08:03 AM

Many folks here have played Hockey. Really has no bearing on the discussion. - People who played sports understand what it means to be on a team and what it means to stick up for one another no matter what. People who never played sports do not understand what that is like, so henceforth it has complete bearing.

And i most certainly read that post. It was thoughtful. - I couldnt tell

Worrying about the Sedins getting pushed around, well like i said, they are used to it, That is toughness in itself. It is absolutely nothing new, yet people are posting like this is just only starting to happen. - UMMMMMM people have been talking about this for a LONG LONG time. The reason it is prominent after an LA game? Because it is so easy to see how it affects us. And being able to brag that our Sedins can get beat up every game and keep playing isnt a source of pride. How long till Henrik takes a dirty hit that takes him out for the season or longer?

Its difficult to strike the balance, for every team in the NHL. Everybody is confused about the reffing and discipline. If the Canucks MO in this time in the league is to not overreact and keep that penalty box bare, then fine. - Thats just it, we are not confused. There is obvious and glaring preferences given to some teams in this league. LA is one of them and if they can throw dirty hits every game without any reprecussion from those that are supposed to deal with it. Thats when it becomes the teams job to protect themselves.

We will see what happens. There are other teams that take punishment as well without resorting to goonery. Ive just never really cared for it in this day and age where a league gets it wrong about how to better serve the skilled players. - Defending your captain from dirty hits and non calls from the refs is hardly goonery, in fact its how you stop it. I didn't say lets go Bertuzzi him, but you HAVE to stand up for your team mates, especially your captain.


  • 0

#18 TimberWolf

TimberWolf

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,094 posts
  • Joined: 28-February 04

Posted 24 March 2013 - 08:14 AM

What is it you guys are expecting to happen? Either another player is going to drop the gloves or he will not. Do you know what happens to this team when they punch a guy that refuses to fight?

Let's look at it from another perspective. The next time we play Phoenix, some Coyotes will look for some retribution on Edler. Guess what? He won't fight. So when that fails in the game, are the Coyotes lacking toughness?

Instead of this mysterious "stick up for eachother" and "lacking toughness" please say EXACTLY what you want players to do and how they will do it without the league handing out suspensions on us like it's Halloween candy.
  • 0

I was saying Lu-Urns...

“That guys an idiot. It’s his own fault if he can’t tell the difference between an all star center and a plug defenceman”

"It's not the location. We just can't beat the Canucks. Thank god they're in the West."


#19 Melons

Melons

    Comets Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 427 posts
  • Joined: 26-February 13

Posted 24 March 2013 - 08:23 AM

If Nolan is cranking Danny's neck with his stick while he is down on the ice, we need some pushback people.

Really we make it too easy for the refs not to call anything. If we don't care, why should they? A little pushback keeps the officials on edge, forces them to police after the whistle, maybe even be proactive.

Too often our guys are on their own, trying to deal with 2 or 3 opponents after the whistle while their linemates are skating towards the bench. It's not right.

Team toughness includes finishing checks, clearing the crease, taking your man, and standing up for one another.

"For he today that sheds his blood with me,
Shall be my brother."
  • 2

#20 higgyfan

higgyfan

    Canucks Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,087 posts
  • Joined: 15-July 12

Posted 24 March 2013 - 08:44 AM

If we had a good PP, the problem would solve itself.
  • 0

#21 Melons

Melons

    Comets Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 427 posts
  • Joined: 26-February 13

Posted 24 March 2013 - 08:48 AM

What is it you guys are expecting to happen? Either another player is going to drop the gloves or he will not. Do you know what happens to this team when they punch a guy that refuses to fight?

Let's look at it from another perspective. The next time we play Phoenix, some Coyotes will look for some retribution on Edler. Guess what? He won't fight. So when that fails in the game, are the Coyotes lacking toughness?

Instead of this mysterious "stick up for eachother" and "lacking toughness" please say EXACTLY what you want players to do and how they will do it without the league handing out suspensions on us like it's Halloween candy.


The League is gonna do what the League is gonna do. Same with the refs. Frankly, we can't keep playing each game like we are facing 3 opponents (league, refs, opposing team). None of them have our interests in mind.

Sticking up for one another doesn't mean McSorleying everyone on the ice. It can mean: finishing our checks, not skating to the bench while one of your teammates in being intimidated by the opposing team, crashing the other teams net when they crash yours, or calling up Jim Vandermeer. OK, that last one might not happen for a little bit.

Shanahan and the disciplinary committee are really being watched right now. At some point even the TV networks might start publicly asking questions about the absurd decisions coming out of the NHL (stay tuned for a rant on this. Cherry didn't even have anything to say about the Lupul-Nash Paradox). But like I said before, we can't play like we are constantly worried about what others are thinking. And team toughness can be achieved without resorting to questionable play.
  • 0

#22 debluvscanucks

debluvscanucks

    Canucks Hall-of-Famer

  • Super Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 23,029 posts
  • Joined: 19-February 08

Posted 24 March 2013 - 08:55 AM

If Nolan is cranking Danny's neck with his stick while he is down on the ice, we need some pushback people.

Really we make it too easy for the refs not to call anything. If we don't care, why should they? A little pushback keeps the officials on edge, forces them to police after the whistle, maybe even be proactive.

Too often our guys are on their own, trying to deal with 2 or 3 opponents after the whistle while their linemates are skating towards the bench. It's not right.

Team toughness includes finishing checks, clearing the crease, taking your man, and standing up for one another.

"For he today that sheds his blood with me,
Shall be my brother."


Problem is though, we just can't get away with it. We're down some players and can't afford to lose more and we all know how we fare at the end of the disciplinary stick.

Ideally - yes. Realistically - no, we just aren't allowed to fight back. There's an eye on the Canucks that isn't always watching as closely as it should be. I do like the fact, though, that the team is hinting toward not giving a rat's behind anymore in a fed up way. We're inching there, slowly, but this team's been programmed by the league to watch their backs but don't act on that. It's pathetically sad, as I love the old school hockey where the refs let the players sort it out. I know - injuries and so on. But I think there's more risk to injury when players can't protect themselves...if Hank is seriously injured one day, it'll be the end of me and this hockey farce. The league can then hang their sorry ass heads in shame for not protecting one of their best. Or allowing those around him to do so.
  • 1

Posted Image


#23 uber_pwnzor

uber_pwnzor

    Canucks Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,451 posts
  • Joined: 07-December 11

Posted 24 March 2013 - 09:01 AM

Don't we have like the most fighting majors in the entire league?
  • 0

#24 Wilbur

Wilbur

    Canucks Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,141 posts
  • Joined: 02-December 03

Posted 24 March 2013 - 09:02 AM

Problem is though, we just can't get away with it. We're down some players and can't afford to lose more and we all know how we fare at the end of the disciplinary stick.

Ideally - yes. Realistically - no, we just aren't allowed to fight back. There's an eye on the Canucks that isn't always watching as closely as it should be.

Agreed. It's a tactic in the playoffs for the other team to get a power play, simply maul a Sedin and wait for the retaliation. Retaliation gets penalized and, voila, a power play. It's win/win for the other team.
  • 0

#25 Melons

Melons

    Comets Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 427 posts
  • Joined: 26-February 13

Posted 24 March 2013 - 09:04 AM

Problem is though, we just can't get away with it. We're down some players and can't afford to lose more and we all know how we fare at the end of the disciplinary stick.

Ideally - yes. Realistically - no, we just aren't allowed to fight back. There's an eye on the Canucks that isn't always watching as closely as it should be. I do like the fact, though, that the team is hinting toward not giving a rat's behind anymore in a fed up way. We're inching there, slowly, but this team's been programmed by the league to watch their backs but don't act on that. It's pathetically sad, as I love the old school hockey where the refs let the players sort it out. I know - injuries and so on. But I think there's more risk to injury when players can't protect themselves...if Hank is seriously injured one day, it'll be the end of me and this hockey farce. The league can then hang their sorry ass heads in shame for not protecting one of their best. Or allowing those around him to do so.


I know what you're saying, Deb. Most people are arguing that. What I'm saying is that team toughness doesn't require us playing over the edge. We can do simple things, hockey plays, that up the ante, increase our toughness and keep the other team honest.
  • 0

#26 canuckelhead70

canuckelhead70

    Comets Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 594 posts
  • Joined: 07-April 12

Posted 24 March 2013 - 09:06 AM

if only odjick was playing with this team........

It does appear to me that this team for some reason doesn't have eachother's back. Something really seems off and divided instead of united. Are some players unclear as to what their roll is on the team? I still picture that twit Marchand punching Daniel in the face 17 times and laughing at him, makes my blood boil.

Edited by canuckelhead70, 24 March 2013 - 12:33 PM.

  • 1

#27 Boudrias

Boudrias

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,648 posts
  • Joined: 14-January 04

Posted 24 March 2013 - 09:16 AM

Saw Jordan Nolan taking liberties on our Captain today and I am disappointed by the lack of team toughness we have to address when other teams run our star players. The bigger problem is that it's not an isolated incident.

I know AV preaches to play between the whistles, etc, but that does not address the issue. I'm not suggesting we need someone to fight Jordan Nolan, but our team should hit legally back or increase the physicality on their skilled players. I think our team lacks the team toughness and intimidation, which is much needed to go far in the playoffs.

If an incident like that happened to Boston, Toronto or Ottawa, you know full well that you will need to answer to someone like Thorton, Orr or Neil. What are your thoughts?

On a related note, I've always longed for a legitimate top 6-9 power forward like a Ryan Clowe or Chris Stewart on this team who will keep others in line, and also have some skill to back it up. Perhaps Kassian can grow into one of these players, some day.

Good question and a great response from GarthButcher.

Obviously the Canucks have to get enough points to make the playoffs but IMO they dwell on the regular season play and forget about what CUP play really means. I watched the LA game and saw Van's d-core losing the physical battles thru the game. Any team that plays Van realizes that playing the Twins physically pays off. Without accountability by the Canucks it simply encourages more of the same. I don't think it will ever go away.

Nolan's crosscheck on Hank, Penner's hit from behind on Tanev, Frasers cheap shot on Danny, bumping Schneider and the ongoing beatdown on Burrows (every game) is to be expected. When healthy Van should have a roster capable of playing a physical game. Alberts did rock Penner but I can't remember if it was before or after the Tanev hit. Bottom line in LA was Van had the horses to have isolated on LA's top offensive players and played 'tit for tat' all game. The LA game was so far away from playoff hockey that I hold little hope for post season play unless things change.

Alex Burrows: What is happening to this guy is a travesty IMO. Every game he endures the crosschecks and slashes that never get called. I understand that in some ways he created the problem. When Burrows broke into the league he did what he had to do to stick, not unlike how many other NHLers. How many of those players elevated their game to become arguably one of the premier wingers in the NHL? He was good enough for Yzerman to pick him for Team Canada last spring but he isn't good enough for the NHL to treat him with the same respect they extend others.

Again, I call for an iso on Burrows for several games and that the tape be sent to the NHL for review. He still carries the stigma surrounding the Auger incident when IMO he was vindicated. Cooker can be rehabed in Pitt but when Burrows tones down his yapping and diving it means nothing. I sometimes wonder if they are trying to drive him from the NHL.
  • 4

#28 riffraff

riffraff

    Canucks Third-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,907 posts
  • Joined: 10-April 07

Posted 24 March 2013 - 09:25 AM

The cross heck on Hank should have been responded period. unfortunately there was nobody on the ice capable at the time. in a game like this, kassian should be playing with the sedins but obviously he is out. any response a few shifts later is too late and most likely would result in a five minute penalty and multi game suspension because a buffoon is in charge of such things.

the boarding on Tanev by penner was a tough one because a penalty was being called on the play. The Canucks are supposedly a pp team and it being a close game a guy like Sestito who knows this also knows that he could end up benched or even waived for jeopardizing the chances in a 1-0 game.....if he had been with the Canucks longer he probably would have jumped in (speculation) instead lappy, the most useless pseudo enforcer on our team and possibly in the league jumped on Penner like a flee, gloves off and accomplishing nothing.....frustrating because lappy could have got a penalty for essentially no response.

This team is in a tough spot this way. The identity is vague. The problem is it all gets worse in the post season with less calls.

I watched the leafs bruins game yesterday. Yikes. Built to bruise. And how do you think those calls will go against either?

Bottom line is, IMHO, we don't get out of a series due to physicality issues against:

La
Anaheim
St. Louis
San Jose
Boston

And I hate to say it I question a series even against the leafs right now....I have to be honest they are playing no worse than us and are way more physical.

Edited by riffraff, 24 March 2013 - 09:34 AM.

  • 1
Posted Image


CanucksSayEh, on 12 March 2013 - 10:12 PM, said:
When the playoffs come around, nobody is scared of getting in a fight, but every night, they get their mom to check under the bed for Raffi Torres.

#29 ButterBean

ButterBean

    Canucks Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,228 posts
  • Joined: 23-February 09

Posted 24 March 2013 - 09:51 AM

If MG truly wanted to change the identity of this team he would trade Burrows. Respect to him as a player, but he is not cutting it right now. He isn't producing with the Sedins, has no toughness to protect them, and he's not getting any penalties drawn against him because of his rep. Put Kassian with the twins so they don't get bullied.
  • 0

#30 TOMapleLaughs

TOMapleLaughs

    Canucks Hall-of-Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 30,518 posts
  • Joined: 19-September 05

Posted 24 March 2013 - 10:17 AM

When healthy, we're alright.

Sedin Sedin Kassian - Good pushback from Zack and the Sedins aren't these supposedly soft guys anymore.

Booth Kesler Higgins - All can dish out some hurt if needed

Raymond Schroeder Hansen - This is the line that will be targeted. If Raymond is caught in full-flight, that's dangerous. And Schroeder needs to prove that he can be a bit more of a pest, if anything. Esp. against bigger opponents. Can he hit? Hansen is a proven irritant.

Burrows Lappy/Ebbett Weise/Sestito/Pini/etc. I know, i know. How do you have Burr on the 4th? Why, to make the ultimate specialty line, of course. And besides, AV will be shuffling these guys around a lot. When the games start getting tough, this 4th line, prob. with Hansen on the wing, will be used more than the Schroeder line. This line has significant pushback and a huge troll factor. Burr-Lappy-Hansen? Not bad.

It would be nice if we had center depth though. Other teams are shoring up.
  • 0
Posted Image




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Canucks.com is the official Web site of The Vancouver Canucks. The Vancouver Canucks and Canucks.com are trademarks of The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership.  NHL and the word mark and image of the Stanley Cup are registered trademarks and the NHL Shield and NHL Conference logos are trademarks of the National Hockey League. All NHL logos and marks and NHL team logos and marks as well as all other proprietary materials depicted herein are the property of the NHL and the respective NHL teams and may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of NHL Enterprises, L.P.  Copyright © 2009 The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership and the National Hockey League.  All Rights Reserved.