• Announcements

    • StealthNuck

      All Threads Must Contain Tags!   07/25/2017

      ALL THREADS MUST CONTAIN TAGS   All threads in this forum must contain tags prefixed to topic titles. The purpose of the tags is to eliminate confusion in recent threads lists, and to create an organized and consistent environment. Moderators may immediately lock and thread that does not contain tags.    Tags must be placed at the start of your thread title, following this exact formatting:    [Tag] Thread Title   Here are some of the most used popular tags:    [Proposal]
      A trade, or trades, for next season, or even the off-season.
      [Off-Season]
      FA signings, off-season trades for RFA's, UFA's rights etc...
      [Value Of]
      (A question regarding a players worth, whether from another team, or the Canucks)
      [Speculation] Posting a rumor (with a source of course), but providing why it could be possible for the Canucks to land that player.   [Discussion]
      Thoughts on team trading strategy and composition.   Please feel free to create your own tag if none of these suit your thread.   

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Alex Burrows 14

(Proposal) Edler to wing?

Recommended Posts

This is unlikely because he has a lot of potential but lately he has been terrible defensively and is a big strong body. We have a lot of depth on D for now..... and by the way i thought of this before we put ballard on wing ;)

Sedins Burrows

Edler Kesler Kassian/Higgins

Raymond Schroeder Hansen

Weise Lapierre Higgins/Kassian

Hamhuis Bieksa

Tanev Garrison

Ballard Alberts

Barker

Just a thought

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually, the last two games he hasn't done any mistakes, I think he's turner the corner.

Come on, he's struggling enough at the position he played his whole life, and you want to put him on the wing? I mean, even I like to play armchair GM/Coach, but this is just complete non-sense.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually, the last two games he hasn't done any mistakes, I think he's turner the corner.

Come on, he's struggling enough at the position he played his whole life, and you want to put him on the wing? I mean, even I like to play armchair GM/Coach, but this is just complete non-sense.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually, the last two games he hasn't done any mistakes, I think he's turner the corner.

Come on, he's struggling enough at the position he played his whole life, and you want to put him on the wing? I mean, even I like to play armchair GM/Coach, but this is just complete non-sense.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If any defender is going to play forward on this team it is Bieksa or Ballard. They are masquerading as D-men anyways :emot-parrot: why not make Bieksa a power forward and Ballard a 2 way guy ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is unlikely because he has a lot of potential but lately he has been terrible defensively and is a big strong body. We have a lot of depth on D for now..... and by the way i thought of this before we put ballard on wing ;)

Sedins Burrows

Edler Kesler Kassian/Higgins

Raymond Schroeder Hansen

Weise Lapierre Higgins/Kassian

Hamhuis Bieksa

Tanev Garrison

Ballard Alberts

Barker

Just a thought

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually, the last two games he hasn't done any mistakes, I think he's turner the corner.

Come on, he's struggling enough at the position he played his whole life, and you want to put him on the wing? I mean, even I like to play armchair GM/Coach, but this is just complete non-sense.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.