• Announcements

    • StealthNuck

      Forum-specific Rules   07/11/2017

      These are board specific rules for the Trades and Rumors forum designed to provide organization and a better experience for everyone. Please review these rules before posting new threads. 
        THREAD ETIQUETTE   1. Please search for an existing thread before posting. This forum can be very fast moving, so it's understandable if redundant threads are inadvertently posted. In such a case, please use the report feature to request removal of redundant threads.    2. Provide a clearly identifiable topic title so that users can readily understand the content. The title should include any and all teams involved, as well as player names or other personnel involved as appropriate.   3. All trades, signings, rumors and other news MUST include a linkable source. Simply posting the name of the source is not enough. Effort should also be made to copy and paste the full article, or at the very least the relevant portion of text from the source to the first post of the thread. Moderators may remove low-quality threads in favour of high-quality threads. 

      Affixed to the front of your title should be a label that identifies the type of transaction that is taking place. For all trades use [TRADE]. For all signings use [SIGNING]. For all waiver-wire transactions use [WAIVERS]. For all rumours use [RUMOUR].
      For articles or news items that don't fit into the above categories, affix an appropriate label of your choice such as [NEWS], [ARTICLE] or [MISC].   4. When the status of a thread changes a new thread can be created. The new thread should reflect the change and help focus the discussion on current events. e.g. Someone may create a new thread when a rumor becomes a trades. The old thread will be locked by the moderating team.    5. Do not misrepresent the contents of your thread or post false trades or rumors. Trolling will result in a permanent suspension. 

      SOURCES   The following source types are considered INVALID. Any links to posts or threads on other message boards Any links to personal blogs Any news heard on the radio that does not have a link to an audio vault or podcast Any news seen on television that does not have a link to online video Any news spread by word of mouth
      Additionally, certain sources may be be blacklisted due to poor credentials, clear traffic-mongering etc. Blacklisted sources will be posted here. 
      Thank you for your co-operation and please PM the Administrator or Moderators if you have any questions, concerns or suggestions regarding this forum.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

D.Doughty

[Speculation] Kiprusoff to the Leafs

Recommended Posts

Lots of twitter noise about Leafs interest in Kiprusoff as reported on TSN. Of course Leafs will inquire IF he's available. Due diligence

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Darren Dreger@DarrenDreger2h

Lots of twitter noise about Leafs interest in Kiprusoff as reported on TSN. Of course Leafs will inquire IF he's available. Due diligence.

aint no troll. lol. If it does happen i hope TO gets fleeced.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

... wtf... Kipper is like 36, he's loved in Calgary, and they would give him up for what exactly? - Leafs left overs, as they're trading for a 36 y/o goaltender that can only be construed as a rental.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Kipprusoff is having a terrible season - his worst since he arrived in Calgary.

.873 sv % and hasn't looked any better of late.

I hope Feaster finally wins one at the Leafs expense.

Go for it Toronto. If you think this will drive the price down for Luongo, suck it. You're dreaming.

Go for it.

Kipper to TO for Gardiner and a 1st.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Leafs don't need a goalie. They are going to make the playoffs with what they have.

But if they can get Kipper, someone to mentor Reimer for the next couple of years, for some like Gardiner, I'd say go for it.

Kipper wouldn't cost much more than that. At most they'd have to toss in a 2nd round pick.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's a horrible deal.

Trade a 35 year old player (a great player, but with a contract that expires as a UFA) for a 24 year old promising goalie who could be qualified as an RFA next year?

I don't understand why the Flames want so much for Iginla. I could see if he had even one year on his contract left, but he doesn't. He's a rental player, and there's no guarantee he could be re-signed.

He's worth a 1st round draft pick or a 2nd round + 2nd tier prospect AT BEST. Any team that gives up a young roster player and a pick is giving up way too much....unless they can make the pick conditional under the agreement that Iginla signs with the new team.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's a horrible deal.

Trade a 35 year old player (a great player, but with a contract that expires as a UFA) for a 24 year old promising goalie who could be qualified as an RFA next year?

I don't understand why the Flames want so much for Iginla. I could see if he had even one year on his contract left, but he doesn't. He's a rental player, and there's no guarantee he could be re-signed.

He's worth a 1st round draft pick or a 2nd round + 2nd tier prospect AT BEST. Any team that gives up a young roster player and a pick is giving up way too much....unless they can make the pick conditional under the agreement that Iginla signs with the new team.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's a horrible deal.

Trade a 35 year old player (a great player, but with a contract that expires as a UFA) for a 24 year old promising goalie who could be qualified as an RFA next year?

I don't understand why the Flames want so much for Iginla. I could see if he had even one year on his contract left, but he doesn't. He's a rental player, and there's no guarantee he could be re-signed.

He's worth a 1st round draft pick or a 2nd round + 2nd tier prospect AT BEST. Any team that gives up a young roster player and a pick is giving up way too much....unless they can make the pick conditional under the agreement that Iginla signs with the new team.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Brenden Morrow got Joe Morrow. Murray got two 2nd round picks. The price for Iggy will be even higher and everyone knows it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.