CanucksSayEh Posted March 26, 2013 Share Posted March 26, 2013 I would break things if he was let go. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Watermelons Posted March 26, 2013 Share Posted March 26, 2013 I think he'd want to stay as a Canuck as well because we gave him a chance to play in the NHL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mad Cow Disease Posted March 26, 2013 Share Posted March 26, 2013 6 years, $20m. DO IT GILLIS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pouria Posted March 26, 2013 Share Posted March 26, 2013 His contract is over at the end on the season.... Does Vancouver have the cap space to keep him? They better because he is a solid defenseman for us and has offensive talent... He is one of the trusted defenseman and always stays calm... He will want more money, but do the Canucks have the money to make him stay? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 26, 2013 Share Posted March 26, 2013 I would be shocked if he wasn't a memeber of the Canucks next season given that he is an RFA.... However, the process could get pretty ugly if Tanev gets greedy and goes to arbitration. I would hope that he will re-sign for 3 yrs at $1.5 M per Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pouria Posted March 26, 2013 Share Posted March 26, 2013 6 years, $20m. DO IT GILLIS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RyanKeslord17 Posted March 26, 2013 Share Posted March 26, 2013 How about a Burr type contract: 4yrs/$8M? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A Skylit Drive Posted March 26, 2013 Share Posted March 26, 2013 I'll be happy with 1.5-2.0. Love the guy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bodee Posted March 26, 2013 Share Posted March 26, 2013 I don't think the other teams in the league have even heard of him still. So I imagine he'll re-sign with us... Unless Gillis does something stupid Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CANUCK-EXPRESS Posted March 26, 2013 Share Posted March 26, 2013 2 years 1.8M Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billabong Posted March 26, 2013 Share Posted March 26, 2013 There is only a very few players I would consider trading tanev for and unless players like top line forwards or top pairing defensemen become available... I'm gonna go out on a whim and say he's staying.... Tanev is a stud Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peaches Posted March 26, 2013 Share Posted March 26, 2013 wouldn't call him offensive. But high intelligent and off the charts hockey iq. How the hell did we even find him? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJDDawg Posted March 26, 2013 Share Posted March 26, 2013 Dude...stop making stupid threads. It's all you do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThatPope Posted March 26, 2013 Share Posted March 26, 2013 If Tanev had offense in his game he would win the Norris (at some point in his carreer). He is THAT good. Very few players in the NHL can win the puck along the boards as efficiently and effortlessly, all while making great little passes into space for a teammate to pick up, as Tanev consistently does. He is Lidstrom like in his own zone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canuck Surfer Posted March 26, 2013 Share Posted March 26, 2013 Lets ask this a different way? What would Tanev get if he went to arbitration? I'm guessing $1.75 or $2 mill? Many solid depth defenders get $3 or $4 mill, but thats not comparable, those would be vets past their ELC who have both more leverage and stats behind them. But arbitration is for one or 2 years (someone welcome to clarify) and a ballpark guess (if someone else wants to load real comparable s?). So we offer 3 years at $2 mill, pay at the high side but get an extra year or so; much like with Hansen! And Hansen still turned a bargain! I would be shocked if he wasn't a memeber of the Canucks next season given that he is an RFA.... However, the process could get pretty ugly if Tanev gets greedy and goes to arbitration. I would hope that he will re-sign for 3 yrs at $1.5 M per Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D.Doughty Posted March 26, 2013 Share Posted March 26, 2013 7 years 3 mil/season! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bring_Back_Bertuzzi Posted March 27, 2013 Share Posted March 27, 2013 hes worth keeping Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grandmaster Posted March 27, 2013 Share Posted March 27, 2013 What is with some of you?? The guy is a bottom pairing D man and some of you want to throw 3M per or MORE!!!!! 1-2M / year is the MAX!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raiun Posted March 27, 2013 Share Posted March 27, 2013 I'd give him a 3 year at 2M offer, see if he can step up his offense a bit in that time and keep his D play consistent. After that, re-evaluate where he's at as a player. If he was the type of guy to put up points more often, especially if he had a really big slapshot, I could see him going for more. I think he's going to keep improving.. Also, he has a sweet wrister. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thad Posted March 27, 2013 Share Posted March 27, 2013 My dream would be 3 years at 2.5 per year. Team pays more than what he's worth for a pretty good length. By the end of the deal, it should be a total steal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.