RyanKeslord17 Posted March 29, 2013 Share Posted March 29, 2013 Was watching Valk after the game, and he said he would love to see Hejduk here, and he beloved he will bring back 2 scoring lines again. Does anybody agree with Valk? What would we give up? We could have a top 6 of: Sedin-Sedin-Hejduk Higgins-Kesler-Burrows Or switch Burr and Hejduk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Great Dane Posted March 29, 2013 Share Posted March 29, 2013 Points have been decreasing steadily. Only 11 points this season, I don't see him as much of an upgrade over most guys in our top 6. But on the other side he does provide depth and would cost nothing to acquire. Tough call but don't think it's worth it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yete Posted March 29, 2013 Share Posted March 29, 2013 what matters is his playoff stats Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuck_trevor16 Posted March 29, 2013 Share Posted March 29, 2013 he is like the only player left from the old regime Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Great Dane Posted March 29, 2013 Share Posted March 29, 2013 what matters is his playoff stats Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tortorella's Rant Posted March 29, 2013 Share Posted March 29, 2013 Pass. He's done. You can see his numbers have been slipping. This addresses our needs how, exactly? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tangerines Posted March 29, 2013 Share Posted March 29, 2013 No thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Samuel Påhlsson Posted March 29, 2013 Share Posted March 29, 2013 Sadly I'm not keeping my hopes up for the Canucks to acquire some offensive pieces. Even though it's clear we need offensive help even with Kesler in the line up to compete with the other top teams. Not that Hedjuk would fit our needs anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smashian Kassian Posted March 29, 2013 Share Posted March 29, 2013 No. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StopesisCanucks Posted March 29, 2013 Share Posted March 29, 2013 i would take him he is cheap and he could do well in playoffs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Primus099 Posted March 29, 2013 Share Posted March 29, 2013 he'd be a 3rd liner on the Canucks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tystick Posted March 29, 2013 Share Posted March 29, 2013 i would take him he is cheap and he could do well in playoffs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil_314 Posted March 29, 2013 Share Posted March 29, 2013 I'd do it, if Ray Shero decides not to. Even though he's old he's still got a good shot, I'd love to have him on the left side on his forehand, getting shots off on the PP. He also knows how to get open while guys set him up from the other side. I mean Kes would be the 1st unit but unless Hansen's shot becomes top notch (or if Kassian learns to one time, though he was mainly brought in to be the big guy in front) I think Hejduk could be a solid piece to add to the offense. I wouldn't trade more than a 3rd or a prospect for him though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apple Juice Posted March 29, 2013 Share Posted March 29, 2013 If we snag him for like a 4th or 5th rounder, sure. He has pretty much no value and Hejduk can provide timely goals for us... Then again, if he sucks against us, I wonder if he'll be good if he plays for us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kanucks1 Posted March 29, 2013 Share Posted March 29, 2013 Sure, good veteran depth player, cost cheap. A 4th or two 5ths probably Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StopesisCanucks Posted March 29, 2013 Share Posted March 29, 2013 If we snag him for like a 4th or 5th rounder, sure. He has pretty much no value and Hejduk can provide timely goals for us... Then again, if he sucks against us, I wonder if he'll be good if he plays for us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CB007 Posted March 29, 2013 Share Posted March 29, 2013 He & Joe killed the canucks years ago Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldnews Posted March 29, 2013 Share Posted March 29, 2013 The memory of Hejduk I'd jump at - the current player... a tough sell. His underlying numbers have gotten pretty bad. He's only a 2 million cap hit and a UFA, so the rental price imo would not be significant, but how much can he add at this point? Don't see where he'd fit in the lineup to be honest. Pass. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frazzY Posted March 29, 2013 Share Posted March 29, 2013 If we snag him for like a 4th or 5th rounder, sure. He has pretty much no value and Hejduk can provide timely goals for us... Then again, if he sucks against us, I wonder if he'll be good if he plays for us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GLASSJAW Posted March 29, 2013 Share Posted March 29, 2013 Pass. He's done. You can see his numbers have been slipping. This addresses our needs how, exactly? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.