Like that is going to change anything. Think your the first one to think about that one. THe people who runs this forum know how much everyone laugh at eklund and he's still a credible source
Never said i was the first nor did i say anything you have mentioned above, if he has permission to still be a credible source even after "the people running the forums know we laugh at Eklund" then that brings up a ton of red flags for me. Why don't we let every anonymous "insider" credible if thats the case? My point exactly.
Edited by Belsy91, 30 March 2013 - 03:46 PM.