oldnews Posted April 1, 2013 Share Posted April 1, 2013 Look at the Iginla trade, that just goes to show what kind of affect the market can have on the value of a player. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuck_trevor16 Posted April 1, 2013 Share Posted April 1, 2013 if a trade happen I would like to see it earlier like Tuesday........not some last minute deal which could panic mode Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smashian Kassian Posted April 1, 2013 Share Posted April 1, 2013 Look at the Murray trade and you realize that there isn't as much rhyme or reason to "the market" as people assume. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canuck Surfer Posted April 1, 2013 Share Posted April 1, 2013 BUF Edler Prospect VAN Ott Myers ____________ PHX 3rd VAN Torres ____________ PHI Raymond Ballard 2nd VAN Hartnell ____________ SJS 1st VAN Clowe __________________________________ D. SEDIN - H. SEDIN - KASSIAN BURROWS - KESLER - HANSEN HARTNELL - OTT - CLOWE HIGGINS - LAPIERRE - TORRES SESTITO HAMHUIS - BIEKSA GARRISON - MYERS BARKER - TANEV LUONGO SCHNEIDER Every game against the Canucks is a game in hell. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frazzY Posted April 1, 2013 Share Posted April 1, 2013 I still think we should deal Schneider. They are both more than capable, the Stanley Cup doesnt go to the best goalie, it goes to the best team. Trading Schneider would improve our team with a better return. Some would argue that u are giving up the better goalie.. But goaltending isnt the problem, its scoring, defense and special teams. So what move will potentially improve the team the most? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WiDeN Posted April 1, 2013 Share Posted April 1, 2013 The ridiculousness of this post cannot be elaborated upon enough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canucks_Hockey_101 Posted April 1, 2013 Share Posted April 1, 2013 I don't know what disappoints me more, the idiotic post about Luongo being an AHL goalie, o the fact that I actually agree with you. It's a sad day for me either way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neversummer Posted April 1, 2013 Share Posted April 1, 2013 'Gillis in talks with multiple teams' ... when did we hear that before? I still think Luongo stays past Apr 3rd. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adniel_g Posted April 1, 2013 Share Posted April 1, 2013 'Gillis in talks with multiple teams' ... when did we hear that before? I still think Luongo stays past Apr 3rd. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gollumpus Posted April 1, 2013 Share Posted April 1, 2013 Let's trade with losing teams that have players losing every night and eventually develop a losing mentality. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigturk8 Posted April 1, 2013 Share Posted April 1, 2013 Regardless of if we trade a goalie or not, I can't wait for trade deadline to be finished so that I don't feel the need to compulsively check these threads anymore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
apollo Posted April 1, 2013 Share Posted April 1, 2013 Regardless of if we trade a goalie or not, I can't wait for trade deadline to be finished so that I don't feel the need to compulsively check these threads anymore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thad Posted April 1, 2013 Share Posted April 1, 2013 Regardless of if we trade a goalie or not, I can't wait for trade deadline to be finished so that I don't feel the need to compulsively check these threads anymore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Big Luongo Posted April 1, 2013 Share Posted April 1, 2013 BUF Edler Prospect VAN Ott Myers ____________ PHX 3rd VAN Torres ____________ PHI Raymond Ballard 2nd VAN Hartnell ____________ SJS 1st VAN Clowe __________________________________ D. SEDIN - H. SEDIN - KASSIAN BURROWS - KESLER - HANSEN HARTNELL - OTT - CLOWE HIGGINS - LAPIERRE - TORRES SESTITO HAMHUIS - BIEKSA GARRISON - MYERS BARKER - TANEV LUONGO SCHNEIDER Every game against the Canucks is a game in hell. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sampy Posted April 1, 2013 Share Posted April 1, 2013 Sportsnet‏@Sportsnet1m Luongo refused to waive no-trade clause to join #Leafs. #Canucks http://bit.ly/16fkkhe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elvis15 Posted April 1, 2013 Share Posted April 1, 2013 Anyone find that early pull kinda fishy? And not very AV like? Possibly protecting some stats? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avicii Posted April 1, 2013 Share Posted April 1, 2013 If we can get Clowe/Roy/Jagr/Bozak/Matthias.. Pink 3 out of the 5 and somehow STILL fit Luongo, i say we keep him. For what the guy's done for this city and organization, i'd rather keep him for this year and if we win a cup, he gets a ring too. He deserves it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theminister Posted April 1, 2013 Share Posted April 1, 2013 There you go again, minister, stringing us along again! If he were cheap enough, as a pending UFA he might be ok. If they took one of Booth or Ballard, that might be a plus as it'd be better than buying them out. He does block shots and hit a bit (as well as being above 50% in faceoffs) but only has 2 points on the year, gives away the puck a bit much and doesn't play against particularly tough opposition (so not a great shut down option). Actually, I'd rather keep Booth or Ballard then move them for a pick than trade them for Handzus after looking at his stats this year. We'd be better off trying Lain on the 4th and keeping Lapierre on the 3rd (and Schroeder on the 2nd, moving to wing when Kesler returns). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canucks_Hockey_101 Posted April 1, 2013 Share Posted April 1, 2013 The only thing Handzus helps the Canucks with are face-offs. He's a proven NHL commodity in that regard. You can't expect Lain to be able to win FO against NHL vets. The only reason I can see this making any sense is if MG views that category, FO, as a vital part of the puck possession of the team and that Handzus' other liabilities would be lesser than the statistical gain from having a FO won. It really comes down to how the management and coaches compartmentalize our on-ice strategy. I don't even think it would be worth sending Ballard, or Booth, back to SJ for the savings.... they may be a potential playoff opponent. Handzus is worth a 6th round pick at most right now. Maybe it is a part of a deal along with Clowe? I could see that though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldnews Posted April 1, 2013 Share Posted April 1, 2013 If this is true that sucks for the Canucks. Because Lu wasn't traded prior to the new CBA, teams are going to be hit with cap penalty (the Lu Clause). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.