Everybody Hates Raymond Posted April 1, 2013 Author Share Posted April 1, 2013 Bieksa is also not on the Ice. So with this logic he is also being traded? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WolfxHaley Posted April 1, 2013 Share Posted April 1, 2013 I just hope its not an injury. We have enough of them right now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
timberz21 Posted April 1, 2013 Share Posted April 1, 2013 I kinda agree, granted he's been playing with Raymond which is more of a 2nd liner type and Hansen. So he's been given a chance, I would like to see Burrows and Schroeder and see what they can do. Would be nice to see Burrows Schroeder and Kassian, maybe we'll see that by the end of the week. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Carell Posted April 1, 2013 Share Posted April 1, 2013 Great! Another injury! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuck_trevor16 Posted April 1, 2013 Share Posted April 1, 2013 I just hope its not an injury. We have enough of them right now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeanBeef Posted April 1, 2013 Share Posted April 1, 2013 I just hope its not an injury. We have enough of them right now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted April 1, 2013 Share Posted April 1, 2013 Vancouver Canucks @VanCanucks 7m No Bieksa or Raymond on the ice for morning skate in San Jose. #Canucks Juice hurt too? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canucks fan in chicago Posted April 1, 2013 Share Posted April 1, 2013 It's not really an injury. Raymond has been traded. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Everybody Hates Raymond Posted April 1, 2013 Author Share Posted April 1, 2013 Bob McKenzie @TSNBobMcKenzie1m Mason Raymond not on ice with VAN today because he's a little banged up. I do not believe it is trade related altho Raymond's name out there Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jj99 Posted April 1, 2013 Share Posted April 1, 2013 Raymond for Roy. Maybe a pick on either side. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gottalovethosenucks Posted April 1, 2013 Share Posted April 1, 2013 Higgins isn't getting the points he usually gets because he has been playing with plugs like ebbit all year . . . he hasn't seen 10 games to get going with booth and kesler . . . Higgins is definately missing his american linemates, those guys played awesome together Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goblix Posted April 1, 2013 Share Posted April 1, 2013 With AV, dont count on seeing two rookies on the same line, at least not playing above 15min. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noseforthenet Posted April 1, 2013 Share Posted April 1, 2013 OMG Why can't Schroeder play with a real 2nd liner for a change Sedin-Sedin-Jensen Burrows-Schroeder-Raymond/Hansen Higgins-Lapierre-Raymond/Hansen Plug-Plug-Plug OMG AV, why does he always complicates his life. Isn't it too obvious????? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Everybody Hates Raymond Posted April 1, 2013 Author Share Posted April 1, 2013 Edler and Raymond for Myers and Roy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
c00kies Posted April 1, 2013 Share Posted April 1, 2013 I'm probably in the minority that would be happy with trading Raymond for a 2nd rounder. Higgins will likely get 1.5-3M, while Raymond will get 3-4, and I'd rather have Higgins at that money than having to justify Raymond's contract by putting him on the 2nd line (yuck). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avicii Posted April 1, 2013 Share Posted April 1, 2013 I hated Raymond with all my guts last year.. Can't trade him now though, he's too important and playing too well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ilya Mikheyev Posted April 1, 2013 Share Posted April 1, 2013 I'm probably in the minority that would be happy with trading Raymond for a 2nd rounder. Higgins will likely get 1.5-3M, while Raymond will get 3-4, and I'd rather have Higgins at that money than having to justify Raymond's contract by putting him on the 2nd line (yuck). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeatSikhing Posted April 1, 2013 Share Posted April 1, 2013 Raymond is not being shopped. Why would the Canucks trade him. I think the Canucks should just look to move Lu and stand pat on any other moves. This years team is not going to win a Stanley Cup. Why mortgage the future for this years team. Not worth it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Master Mind Posted April 1, 2013 Share Posted April 1, 2013 Would be a huge mistake to let him go. He's 2nd on our team in goals! And we're already having problems offensively. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Everybody Hates Raymond Posted April 1, 2013 Author Share Posted April 1, 2013 Farhan Lalji @FarhanLaljiTSN47s Raymond will not play tonight. Sore shoulder. Day to day. #canucks This is sounding fishy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.