Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

Who are the Canucks biggest rivals?


canuckelhead70

Who is are biggest rival team?  

290 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

Chicago for sure, you can't ignore 3 recent playoff matchups in which Chicago leads 2-1, plus the regular season games & the concussion served to Daniel.

We don't play Boston enough for it to be a real rivalry...look at it this way, does anyone consider the Islanders or Rangers rivals?

Respect for the Calgary rivalry as well, there's so much history between the two teams. I just wish it wasn't as one sided as it's been lately, though Calgary did get robbed in the last two games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chicago for sure, you can't ignore 3 recent playoff matchups in which Chicago leads 2-1, plus the regular season games & the concussion served to Daniel.

We don't play Boston enough for it to be a real rivalry...look at it this way, does anyone consider the Islanders or Rangers rivals?

Respect for the Calgary rivalry as well, there's so much history between the two teams. I just wish it wasn't as one sided as it's been lately, though Calgary did get robbed in the last two games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont know why everyone hates la? They played better then us, beat us cleanly and won the series. So do we have to hate everyone who played better then us? And id say boston and chicago no doubt. Boston games are super exciting and intense and will be fr a while. And chicago games are always interesting

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Poor, poor logic. What you forgot to take into account was the most important thing in existence which is "time". The Boston loss was only 2 years ago whereas the Rangers were 19 years ago-----------> It loses relevancy. The United States never engaged in a real physical war with Russia, but that was a "cold war" because it was a technological arms race--"let the best man win".Although they really didn't physically go head-to-head, It occurred in two separate continents and is one of the most documented and well-known "rivalries" of all-time. Frequency will never determine a rivalry as much as "relevant history" and the strive for "dominance" will.

Knocked out of the playoffs first round (kings)+deep playoff history (hawks)>>>>>>> getting our food stolen right off the plate in game 7, exposing an incredible amount of holes in our team, making us completely restructure, and completely depleting our confidence as a dominant NHL team

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Poor, poor logic. What you forgot to take into account was the most important thing in existence which is "time". The Boston loss was only 2 years ago whereas the Rangers were 19 years ago-----------> It loses relevancy. The United States never engaged in a real physical war with Russia, but that was a "cold war" because it was a technological arms race--"let the best man win".Although they really didn't physically go head-to-head, It occurred in two separate continents and is one of the most documented and well-known "rivalries" of all-time. Frequency will never determine a rivalry as much as "relevant history" and the strive for "dominance" will.

Knocked out of the playoffs first round (kings)+deep playoff history (hawks)>>>>>>> getting our food stolen right off the plate in game 7, exposing an incredible amount of holes in our team, making us completely restructure, and completely depleting our confidence as a dominant NHL team

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I actually hate the Rangers almost as much as Boston. That would have been a fantastic way for the Canucks to get their first cup.

Rivalries are created in the playoffs so Chicago has got to be #1. No hard feelings toward LA. They played hard and fair and won because they deserved to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Poor, poor logic. What you forgot to take into account was the most important thing in existence which is "time". The Boston loss was only 2 years ago whereas the Rangers were 19 years ago-----------> It loses relevancy. The United States never engaged in a real physical war with Russia, but that was a "cold war" because it was a technological arms race--"let the best man win".Although they really didn't physically go head-to-head, It occurred in two separate continents and is one of the most documented and well-known "rivalries" of all-time. Frequency will never determine a rivalry as much as "relevant history" and the strive for "dominance" will.

Knocked out of the playoffs first round (kings)+deep playoff history (hawks)>>>>>>> getting our food stolen right off the plate in game 7, exposing an incredible amount of holes in our team, making us completely restructure, and completely depleting our confidence as a dominant NHL team

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hawks then Boston... Other then that wouldn't say the kings are our rivals... Will they are slowly becoming it but its not a long deep rivalry. Wouldn't say the wild either.... They use to suck n now there good for what 3 months and we say they are rivals? Na.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...