Jump to content

Welcome to canucks.com Vancouver Canucks homepage

Photo
- - - - -

Derek Roy #15


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
10 replies to this topic

#1 Samuel Påhlsson

Samuel Påhlsson

    Comets Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 744 posts
  • Joined: 29-February 12

Posted 13 April 2013 - 09:30 PM

First person who wants it can have it.

Also comments or criticism would be appreciated...

Posted Image

Sig too big. -SN


#2 22Sedinery33

22Sedinery33

    Comets Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 548 posts
  • Joined: 15-February 12

Posted 13 April 2013 - 09:32 PM

Roy baby! Looks awesome :)

Edited by KeslersPlayoffBeard, 13 April 2013 - 09:33 PM.

Posted Image

#3 Samuel Påhlsson

Samuel Påhlsson

    Comets Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 744 posts
  • Joined: 29-February 12

Posted 13 April 2013 - 09:36 PM

Roy baby! Looks awesome :)


Credit would be appreciated. ;)

Sig too big. -SN


#4 canucks top scorer

canucks top scorer

    Comets Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 349 posts
  • Joined: 21-March 12

Posted 13 April 2013 - 10:01 PM

Dat looks sick, but why is it red? Maybe try blue?

Posted Image

Credit to me for the sig. I make sigs msg me.


#5 Samuel Påhlsson

Samuel Påhlsson

    Comets Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 744 posts
  • Joined: 29-February 12

Posted 13 April 2013 - 10:03 PM

Dat looks sick, but why is it red? Maybe try blue?


I prefer colourful sigs tbh. I'll put up a blue version as well...

Sig too big. -SN


#6 canucks top scorer

canucks top scorer

    Comets Regular

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 349 posts
  • Joined: 21-March 12

Posted 13 April 2013 - 10:05 PM

I prefer colourful sigs tbh. I'll put up a blue version as well...

Yeah I like the red, I was just wondering why it was red aha

Posted Image

Credit to me for the sig. I make sigs msg me.


#7 Samuel Påhlsson

Samuel Påhlsson

    Comets Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 744 posts
  • Joined: 29-February 12

Posted 13 April 2013 - 10:10 PM

Yeah I like the red, I was just wondering why it was red aha


Yea definitely understand. I tried blue but it ruins the feel tbh.

Sig too big. -SN


#8 pwnstar

pwnstar

    Canucks Second-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,311 posts
  • Joined: 20-January 10

Posted 14 April 2013 - 09:58 AM

I cant see anything on the sig that needs improvement

Awesome stuff!

Edited by pwnstar, 14 April 2013 - 09:58 AM.

Posted Image


#9 -Vintage Canuck-

-Vintage Canuck-

    Canucks Hall-of-Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 80,113 posts
  • Joined: 24-May 10

Posted 20 April 2013 - 10:56 PM

Looks a little too busy, other than that, it's good.

307mg00.jpg


#10 eQuilibrium

eQuilibrium

    Canucks Rookie

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,612 posts
  • Joined: 13-September 08

Posted 21 April 2013 - 08:21 PM

I don't see much wrong with this sig, it's actually quite nice. The stock work is excellent and there is a nice feel of texture here. Way to go.
There were things that do need some improvement
- The use of colored stocks are nicely done and the colorful contrast is there but the transition is not smooth. You don't need the sig to be blue but because the background behind Roy is blue, and then sharply turns into warm colors, the red and yellow seem out of place.

- The stock use on the bottom right are really messy, there are fractals and pieces, even a blue light that are distracting me from the focal point of the signature. if you were to blend that it and remove those parts, the sig will be blended better

- and finally, the text is very "nooby". Don't wait for the text to be implemented after. Make it part of the actual sig in a sense that it should be of equal importance as the render. What I do for my sigs is place the text on the sig right after I position my main athlete or subject. This is done before choosing the background, or the stocks and textures... I find a good text and place it there. The fonts seem out of place. The bold outer stroke is too prominant and distracting.
(Don't worry man, text is the hardest thing to do. Even when you get really really good!!)

Overall it is a great sig and you should feel proud of what you have made. Be encouraged and make more sigs, get better, be WAY MORE CREATIVE. When I was making sigs on this forum a couple of years ago, I was known for my creative sigs. It wasn't because they were tecnically perfect that people liked them, it was because I was willing to take risks. I eventually got better over time and now it has helped me in my new proffesional graphic works.

#11 -Vintage Canuck-

-Vintage Canuck-

    Canucks Hall-of-Famer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 80,113 posts
  • Joined: 24-May 10

Posted 25 April 2013 - 04:02 PM

^ Now that is a definition of CnC right there! marinated.pea-like. :P

307mg00.jpg





Canucks.com is the official Web site of The Vancouver Canucks. The Vancouver Canucks and Canucks.com are trademarks of The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership.  NHL and the word mark and image of the Stanley Cup are registered trademarks and the NHL Shield and NHL Conference logos are trademarks of the National Hockey League. All NHL logos and marks and NHL team logos and marks as well as all other proprietary materials depicted herein are the property of the NHL and the respective NHL teams and may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of NHL Enterprises, L.P.  Copyright © 2009 The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership and the National Hockey League.  All Rights Reserved.