Harbinger Posted April 17, 2013 Share Posted April 17, 2013 Really? I thought that hundreds of thousands of BC viewers tuned in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gross-Misconduct Posted April 17, 2013 Share Posted April 17, 2013 Micheal Smyth pretty much summed up that 30 minute infomercial put out by the Liberals before it was even aired. Dave Babych has better shot at comeback than Christy Clark "You'll see Christy direct, unfiltered and like you've never seen her before," Babych promises, as a short video clip rolls of a blue-jeaned Clark laughing and feeding a cow. After getting over the somewhat creepy feeling of just how strange and surreal this is all becoming (Dave Babych? Cows? Really?) a few thoughts sprang to mind. For one thing, it's clear the Liberals are desperate to make Clark into some kind of warm and likable person who relates to average British Columbians: a down-to-earth hockey mom who's pals with everyone from CEOs to dairy farmers. The Liberals have a lot of ground to make up on that score. "It's a big choice about what comes next for B.C.," Babych tells viewers. "If you ask me, Christy's gettin 'er done." I suspect he wrote that last line himself. But his use of the word "unfiltered" to describe this Sunday's TV show betrayed the hand of a political scriptwriter. When political strategists say "unfiltered" they mean bypassing the news media, which the Liberals are now convinced have got it in for them. So Christy's "unfiltered" mind-meld with voters starts Sunday. I think Babych has a better shot at a comeback. Read more: http://www.theprovin...l#ixzz2QgDdQJ47 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wetcoaster Posted April 17, 2013 Author Share Posted April 17, 2013 Please post the ratings and I will retract if it beat out any of the primetime viewing on the same night. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gross-Misconduct Posted April 17, 2013 Share Posted April 17, 2013 Really? I thought that hundreds of thousands of BC viewers tuned in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harbinger Posted April 17, 2013 Share Posted April 17, 2013 Google away. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Violator Posted April 17, 2013 Share Posted April 17, 2013 No time to run a campaign. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wetcoaster Posted April 17, 2013 Author Share Posted April 17, 2013 Normally you are so helpful when pointing out other peoples errors. Why no help on this one? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harbinger Posted April 17, 2013 Share Posted April 17, 2013 Give a man a fish and you will feed him for a day. Teach a man to fish and you will feed him for a lifetime. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wetcoaster Posted April 17, 2013 Author Share Posted April 17, 2013 so teach me. Please guide me in my search for such things. Or did you just make that number up? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harbinger Posted April 17, 2013 Share Posted April 17, 2013 Nope it came from Keith Baldrey who analyzed it and noted that the program won its time slot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J529 Posted April 17, 2013 Share Posted April 17, 2013 The scandal that never happened? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Violator Posted April 17, 2013 Share Posted April 17, 2013 I'm not seeing anything on the internet about it. But I'll take your word for it and retract what I said. Here is my correction A large percentage greater than 70% of British columbians couldn't have cared less about what the leader of the Scandal plagued liberal leader had to say on Sunday. Welcome to two days later when that same Large percentage still doesn't care. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harbinger Posted April 17, 2013 Share Posted April 17, 2013 You seem to care alot about it your devoting a bit of time to it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aGENT Posted April 17, 2013 Share Posted April 17, 2013 It's funny I could have watched it over the last hour. I just don't care to hear what she has to say. So in this case I can't get passed my prejudice against her. I prefer to hate on her rather than to find out what she has to say. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Common sense Posted April 18, 2013 Share Posted April 18, 2013 http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/story/2013/04/17/bc-linda-reid-porn-site.html The website of Linda Reid, British Columbia's deputy speaker and the B.C. Liberal Member of the Legislative Assembly for Richmond East, includes the web address of a teen porn site. Reid's personal campaign website and Facebook page both list her site with a lindareid.com address, though her site is actually a lindareid.ca address. The discrepancy is likely a typo. The .com website, actually called Teen Flesh, is plastered with images of what appear to be teenage girls engaged in hardcore sex acts. Reid has no affiliation with lindareid.com On Wednesday, the MLA said she was frustrated and seemed to believe that she was the victim of a hack. "We will certainly get to the bottom of it," she told CBC News. "There's no way in the world we'd want to give anyone any notoriety for hacking into websites." The .com website was registered through GoDaddy.com using Domains By Proxy — a service that specializes in hiding website's registered owners. In addition, Elections B.C. says Reid's .ca website doesn’t contain any financing authorization, which is in violations of the Election Act, and the agency plans to contact Reid’s campaign office. But Reid said she was unaware of any problems and on Wednesday afternoon, had yet to hear from Elections B.C. Reid, the B.C. Liberals' longest serving MLA, was first elected to the legislature in 1991. The news comes just one day after B.C.’s provincial election campaign officially started — but it’s not the first scandal to hit the campaign. On Tuesday, as the writ was dropped in the legislature, Kelowna-Mission NDP candidate Dayleen van Ryswyk was forced to resign after controversial comments aimed at First Nations and the French-Canadian Community were made public. B.C.’s next provincial election is on May 14. On the flip side, she just got the votes of the 18-35 male demographic in Richmond-East. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aGENT Posted April 18, 2013 Share Posted April 18, 2013 Yay! More petty sideshow nonsense! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canucks_dynasty Posted April 18, 2013 Share Posted April 18, 2013 I bet if Trevor Linden ever ran for BC premiere...he'd win in a landslide. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hockeyfan87 Posted April 18, 2013 Share Posted April 18, 2013 I think the people of British Columbia deserve better options for political office. I've said it before but none of the major options are appealing and I can't stomach the thought of myself voting for either Christy Clark or Adrian Dix given both their track records and general levels of incompetence. That being said the NDP has gone on record that they would nix both corporate and union donations to political parties. I wasn't planning on voting NDP but this has given me something to consider. Now don't get me wrong I see write through this. It's a vote winner and a tactic that will hurt the Liberals in the long run much moreso than it will hurt the NDP, given the disparity in corporate donations to the Liberals in contrast with the union donations to the NDP. Does anyone have any insightful thoughts on this? Is this a good thing in the NDP's favor or am I missing something? Could they possible go back and not carry through with this campaign promise? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canucks_dynasty Posted April 18, 2013 Share Posted April 18, 2013 The banning of corporate and union donations will benefit the NDP in the long run as typically they get less than what the Liberals get. NDP could choose not to implement the ban citing various bogus or legal reasons. On another note...NDP promises $100M for schools and $60M for daycare. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aGENT Posted April 18, 2013 Share Posted April 18, 2013 On another note...NDP promises $100M for schools and $60M for daycare. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.