rkyway Posted April 20, 2013 Share Posted April 20, 2013 This is the same old AV style; forcing players to play with injuries. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dogbyte Posted April 20, 2013 Share Posted April 20, 2013 I love how the management stresses how important it is to have defensive depth and now we our only right handers out with injuries. We have no depth. Idiots. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Merci Posted April 20, 2013 Share Posted April 20, 2013 Detroit fighting for a playoff spot to keep a 20 year record in tact.. Canucks don't show up at all tonight, Luongo gets start cuz AV knows it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Merci Posted April 20, 2013 Share Posted April 20, 2013 Why dont we try these pairings ? Hamhuis Garrison Edler Ballard Alberts Barker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sgt. grumbles Posted April 20, 2013 Share Posted April 20, 2013 Because Ballard is the worst defensemen that has ever played Hockey Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smiley2051 Posted April 21, 2013 Share Posted April 21, 2013 Corrado. Do it Gillis. DO IT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sgt. grumbles Posted April 21, 2013 Share Posted April 21, 2013 They feel that bringing up Corrado would be throwing him into the fire due to his lack of experience. I say if they clinch the division let him have a couple games to try out here at the end of the season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hockey Fever Posted April 21, 2013 Share Posted April 21, 2013 Screwed! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wallstreetamigo Posted April 21, 2013 Share Posted April 21, 2013 I feel like they haven't learned anything with injuries. AV is the type of coach that throws his players right back into tough minutes as soon as they're medically cleared. And all that does is make sure the player is only able to play at 70% the whole season because they're never fully healed. A groin injury is not something you just play through. If not healed properly, it will nag a player all season. Even with Tanev after he got hit and twisted his ankle, they let him play the rest of the game. What's the point? They probably made his injury even worse by doing that. I feel like this team is way too short-sighted when it comes to these things. Winning now doesn't matter if it hurts our chances to win when it matters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baggins Posted April 21, 2013 Share Posted April 21, 2013 I personally find management's inconsistency regarding the reporting of injuries frustrating. We are the fans, the supporters, the diehards. Tell us like it is. No more about face. PS - if it is indeed a groin-issue, what's AV going to do? Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't he swear on his daughters that it wasn't. Dilemma... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nuxfanabroad Posted April 21, 2013 Share Posted April 21, 2013 LOL abou AV's idiocy. remember when grabner had that late-season hatty for Van vs Anaheim(pretty sure)? Was AV cursing the guy on the bench, like he did Shirokov after he scored a beaut? That musta' been grabs' ticket outa'here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spliced Posted April 21, 2013 Share Posted April 21, 2013 For all the people that cover this team I would think there would be better coverage of the injury situations. This time of year the updates from the team can be very misleading. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ilya Mikheyev Posted April 21, 2013 Share Posted April 21, 2013 Could the Canucks give Corrado a Chance? Perhaps he could pull a Subban. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
higgyfan Posted April 21, 2013 Share Posted April 21, 2013 This is the same old AV style; forcing players to play with injuries. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baggins Posted April 21, 2013 Share Posted April 21, 2013 Explain please. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-DLC- Posted April 21, 2013 Share Posted April 21, 2013 Do you guys not understand that in the playoff stretch you'll NEVER get a straight answer on injuries? They don't want other teams to be able to prepare or have information on what to expect, so they keep spewing out vague, generic answers as a result. It's nothing to criticize, it's actually a tactical move. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobopan Posted April 21, 2013 Share Posted April 21, 2013 1st off i don't believe a word any of our coaches/management say about injuries and 2nd obviously Bieksa has been injured all season long and we were always a predominately LH D team why in good god's name did MG not pick up a Righty at the deadline, or hell sign one instead of Barker and Vandermeer I don't want to hear there was no one available cause the mentioned 2 guys just scream quality.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JE14 Posted April 21, 2013 Share Posted April 21, 2013 Ballard, Tanev, Bieksa injured, Not looking good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nuck nit Posted April 21, 2013 Share Posted April 21, 2013 Because Ballard is the worst defensemen that has ever played Hockey Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nuck nit Posted April 21, 2013 Share Posted April 21, 2013 Not acquiring a right handed d man is not acceptable. Management need a d man in the front office. Forwards do not win championships. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.