Smashian Kassian Posted April 23, 2013 Share Posted April 23, 2013 She works for Team 1040 as a reporter. Team 1040 is a sports radio station. I hope I'm not moving too fast for you here, but that means she is a real, bona fide sports reporter. Believe it or not, women are perfectly capable of understanding and asking questions about sports. Welcome to the 21st century. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TimberWolf Posted April 23, 2013 Share Posted April 23, 2013 I would have said, "shouldn't you be in the kitchen making me a sandwich?" and walked off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Heffy Posted April 23, 2013 Share Posted April 23, 2013 Kinda ironic he brings up the refs after they assisted the Hawk's only goal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MayRayDown Posted April 23, 2013 Share Posted April 23, 2013 Canada is going to be alittle harder to cheer for with Doughty, Perry, Keith. 3 of the biggest douches in the game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bruce Boudreau Posted April 23, 2013 Share Posted April 23, 2013 It's pretty clear Duncan Keith has easily surpassed every other Blackhawk including bird face Dave Bolland to become public enemy #1 in Vancouver. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrazyAL Posted April 23, 2013 Share Posted April 23, 2013 Definitely something fishy about the way the clip is edited. Why does it start with him asking her what she saw? Don't post-game interviews usually start with the reporters asking the questions? I think there's more to this than we know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nuxfanabroad Posted April 23, 2013 Share Posted April 23, 2013 Sorry it's late aft in Asia, no time to read these cmmts(after work will). On a side note, on TSN's website, I see there's NO comments yet, almost 3.5 hrs after this game ended. It seems easterners are commenting on Leaf games, just as the final horn sounds. ESPECIALLY if the maple fleas win. Seems the eastern-biased media go out of their way to discredit our team-yet when there are positive things to say, it's shut down for the night. Little chance to discuss controversy, like keith's low-brow idiocy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Virt 'n Kass Posted April 23, 2013 Share Posted April 23, 2013 Gah, why did they even have to interview that classless douche in the first place? I'd rather lisen to Kane's massive ego or Toews's monotone politician-speak than that stupid prick Keith. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanYouNuck? Posted April 23, 2013 Share Posted April 23, 2013 Im torn between whos at fault here... a) Given the climate of the situation....The hawks got werked and beat by their biggest rivals, DK was getting boo's all night, he was the last man back on the dagger goal, etc you get my point.....Karen could have asked that question differently...or simply not asked that question at all. Yes reporters ask dumb rhetorical questions (I think vancouver reporters are the worst for that) and its their job but the team also needs to think about their reputation with the players (especially the opponents) cuz ultimately the players hold the power to accept the interviews. So shame on Karen there. Professionalism. DK is a professional at the highest level, you know you're in a hockey market and you expect those type of interviews following the game....give better answers, or at least don't make such a prejudice comment. I'm pretty sure the media will now blow this out of proportion come tomorrow. I call it a tie, both at fault here Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CHIPS Posted April 23, 2013 Share Posted April 23, 2013 Keith being Keith. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dildo Faggins Posted April 23, 2013 Share Posted April 23, 2013 Good god what a dik that guy is. I hope he gets a solid elbow to the head sometime in the near future. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uber_pwnzor Posted April 23, 2013 Share Posted April 23, 2013 Wow! What an idiot! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jai604 Posted April 23, 2013 Share Posted April 23, 2013 lol reminds me of torts. i am in no way defending keith for that 2 handed slash, but that was a pretty witty comeback Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phamda Posted April 23, 2013 Share Posted April 23, 2013 Bad response by Keith. badly word question by Thomson. If she ask Keith, what were you trying to accomplish by the two handed slash to Daniel Sedin's midsection on his breakaway? And he gave that response, burn him at the stake. But instead she dances around it and says "it looks like u did something that should have been a penalty". Don't agree with Keith response no matter what but Thomson needs to know how to word her questions better cause she's calling a play a penalty when it wasn't called. I would have loved to hear Thomson ask why he gave dank a two hander and then show him the video of it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ikillchicken Posted April 23, 2013 Share Posted April 23, 2013 Here's the thing guys...it really doesn't matter whether or not it was a stupid question or whether she was trying to get a reaction. By all means, Keith can be rude or insulting if that's the case. He'd hardly be the first player to do so. But DO NOT bring her gender into it. That's way out of line no matter what the situation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~AngelBelle~ Posted April 23, 2013 Share Posted April 23, 2013 Wow what a jerk, he could have just brushed her off without bringing the "you can't skate/gonna be the next female ref huh" banter. 0 Class. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bodee Posted April 23, 2013 Share Posted April 23, 2013 I bet his parents are very proud. Anyway does this not make cheering ANY team playing the Hawks in the playoffs more enjoyable? Every hit on Keith will be twice as sweet. Every boarding of Kane or Toews a cause to top up your glass. For future "douche" interviews I think she would do well to keep a couple of comebacks in her repertoire. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghostsof1915 Posted April 23, 2013 Share Posted April 23, 2013 I honestly don't know how Toews and Seabrook tolerate having jerks like Keith and Kane as team-mates. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sugar baby watermelon Posted April 23, 2013 Share Posted April 23, 2013 Keith is a stooge, don't these guys have someone from their organization coach them on what to/not to say in a scrum, so he lost, he lost to the Canucks and was pissed, poor baby... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shiznak Posted April 23, 2013 Share Posted April 23, 2013 I seriously don't get why people get so worked up about this, if this was someone else from another team we won't be taking about it. He made a sexist remark, big deal. I'm sure she had hear worst before. What's worst a sexist remark or attacking someone's personal life, like what Kesler and Burrows did to Backes? I also, find it hilarious, that CDC is sticking up for the Vancouver media, when half the time you rip on them for asking stupid questions to the Canucks. CDC baffles me, sometimes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.