Jump to content

Welcome to canucks.com Vancouver Canucks homepage

Photo

[Proposal]Luongo goes home


  • Please log in to reply
9 replies to this topic

#1 Merci

Merci

    Canucks Third-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,320 posts
  • Joined: 25-May 09

Posted 23 April 2013 - 09:43 PM

Luongo
Schroeder

Matthias
2nd

then

Booth
Ballard

Nick Foligno

resign Roy


Sedin Sedin Kassian
Higgins Roy Kesler
Foligno Matthias Burrows
Hansen Lapierre Jensen

Hamhuis Garrison
Edler Bieksa
Corrado Tanev
Alberts

Schneider
Lack
  • 0

Keslerific, on 25 May 2014 - 4:47 PM, said:

Gaunce is wayy cooler though, Gaunce is the kind of guy you want to bring with you to Costco

 

vPTJpcO.jpg


#2 Pears

Pears

    Canucks All-Star

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,940 posts
  • Joined: 14-November 11

Posted 23 April 2013 - 09:53 PM

Why would Columbus trade one of their best players for our spares?
  • 0

In my eyes drouin is overrated he can score in the qmjhl but did nothing in last two gold medal games that canada lost. Fox will be better pro than him talk to me in five yrs


   ryan kesler is going to the chicago blackhawks ...       quote me on it


#3 Tortorella's Rant

Tortorella's Rant

    Canucks First-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,983 posts
  • Joined: 11-April 12

Posted 23 April 2013 - 10:03 PM

See, I disagree. I think the Canucks can do better than Matthias. And Schroeder might prove to be decent.
  • 0
Posted Image

#4 JimLahey

JimLahey

    Canucks Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,482 posts
  • Joined: 03-September 12

Posted 23 April 2013 - 10:05 PM

Why would Columbus trade one of their best players for our spares?


Because we shed cap and get a good, young player in return. Columbus's needs are irrelevant.

Edited by JimLahey, 23 April 2013 - 10:06 PM.

  • 0

hL9YqYN.jpg


#5 wizeman

wizeman

    Comets Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 223 posts
  • Joined: 29-December 12

Posted 24 April 2013 - 01:40 PM

Do you guys know how much real money it costs to buy out Luongo? its not monopoly money. Our owner spends to the cap every year. He has not been cheap. So he is not going to chuck out 30mil dollars to Luongo to let him walk away for nothing so we can have 5.3mil more cap room.

You dont get to be a multi millionaire by making decisions like that. Unless Gillis can move him for pieces and NO buy out salary in return, he aint going anywhere.

If he had one year left or something like gomez, then maybe. If the canucks are dead set against playing luongo they stick the guy on waivers and send him to chicago and see how long he likes that before he quits and goes to europe.

However, I dont think we should be that mean. We trade Cory Schneider , Keep Luongo and see how Lack and Cannata pan out.
  • 0

#6 Canucks_Hockey_101

Canucks_Hockey_101

    Canucks Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,195 posts
  • Joined: 05-November 12

Posted 24 April 2013 - 01:51 PM

Because we shed cap and get a good, young player in return. Columbus's needs are irrelevant.


Oh... Well that settles it then I guess...
  • 0

#7 CanucksFanMike

CanucksFanMike

    Canucks Third-Line

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,632 posts
  • Joined: 28-September 11

Posted 24 April 2013 - 05:34 PM

home for Luongo is Montreal.... not Florida (his wife is from Florida)

as for the deals, I wouldn't do either

Edited by CanucksFanMike, 24 April 2013 - 05:34 PM.

  • 0
Posted Image
Credit to -Vintage Canuck-

#8 Armada

Armada

    Canucks Franchise Player

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,117 posts
  • Joined: 03-February 08

Posted 24 April 2013 - 07:40 PM

home for Luongo is Montreal.... not Florida (his wife is from Florida)

as for the deals, I wouldn't do either


Except the fact that he lives in Florida in the off-season...
  • 0
Posted Image
______________Eat, Sleep,Posted ImageRave, Repeat

#9 palindrom

palindrom

    Canucks Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,072 posts
  • Joined: 09-December 10

Posted 25 April 2013 - 11:11 AM

In the second trade, take out Booth and Ballard and Columbus might accept it. at the very least, its a better trade for them.

Without Booth and Ballard, it leave Colombus with 8 450 000$ to spend on free agency, money better spend than acquiring booth and Ballard.

Edited by palindrom, 25 April 2013 - 11:18 AM.

  • 0
Posted Image Was too much for me!

Instead im reading English grammar for advanced dummies





#10 ken kaniff

ken kaniff

    Canucks Prospect

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,064 posts
  • Joined: 18-June 11

Posted 25 April 2013 - 11:41 AM

take our schroeder in your first deal and its acceptable. no need to trade Schroeder.
and the 2nd deal is really bad. booth and ballard will be traded for late picks or bought out.
why have Jensen on the 4th line? why have hansen on the 4th line? no for me
  • 0
RIP rick
Sig too big.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Canucks.com is the official Web site of The Vancouver Canucks. The Vancouver Canucks and Canucks.com are trademarks of The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership.  NHL and the word mark and image of the Stanley Cup are registered trademarks and the NHL Shield and NHL Conference logos are trademarks of the National Hockey League. All NHL logos and marks and NHL team logos and marks as well as all other proprietary materials depicted herein are the property of the NHL and the respective NHL teams and may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of NHL Enterprises, L.P.  Copyright © 2009 The Vancouver Canucks Limited Partnership and the National Hockey League.  All Rights Reserved.