Merci Posted April 24, 2013 Share Posted April 24, 2013 Luongo Schroeder Matthias 2nd then Booth Ballard Nick Foligno resign Roy Sedin Sedin Kassian Higgins Roy Kesler Foligno Matthias Burrows Hansen Lapierre Jensen Hamhuis Garrison Edler Bieksa Corrado Tanev Alberts Schneider Lack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted April 24, 2013 Share Posted April 24, 2013 Why would Columbus trade one of their best players for our spares? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tortorella's Rant Posted April 24, 2013 Share Posted April 24, 2013 See, I disagree. I think the Canucks can do better than Matthias. And Schroeder might prove to be decent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimLahey Posted April 24, 2013 Share Posted April 24, 2013 Why would Columbus trade one of their best players for our spares? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wizeman Posted April 24, 2013 Share Posted April 24, 2013 Do you guys know how much real money it costs to buy out Luongo? its not monopoly money. Our owner spends to the cap every year. He has not been cheap. So he is not going to chuck out 30mil dollars to Luongo to let him walk away for nothing so we can have 5.3mil more cap room. You dont get to be a multi millionaire by making decisions like that. Unless Gillis can move him for pieces and NO buy out salary in return, he aint going anywhere. If he had one year left or something like gomez, then maybe. If the canucks are dead set against playing luongo they stick the guy on waivers and send him to chicago and see how long he likes that before he quits and goes to europe. However, I dont think we should be that mean. We trade Cory Schneider , Keep Luongo and see how Lack and Cannata pan out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canucks_Hockey_101 Posted April 24, 2013 Share Posted April 24, 2013 Because we shed cap and get a good, young player in return. Columbus's needs are irrelevant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanucksFanMike Posted April 25, 2013 Share Posted April 25, 2013 home for Luongo is Montreal.... not Florida (his wife is from Florida) as for the deals, I wouldn't do either Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Armada Posted April 25, 2013 Share Posted April 25, 2013 home for Luongo is Montreal.... not Florida (his wife is from Florida) as for the deals, I wouldn't do either Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
palindrom Posted April 25, 2013 Share Posted April 25, 2013 In the second trade, take out Booth and Ballard and Columbus might accept it. at the very least, its a better trade for them. Without Booth and Ballard, it leave Colombus with 8 450 000$ to spend on free agency, money better spend than acquiring booth and Ballard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ken kaniff Posted April 25, 2013 Share Posted April 25, 2013 take our schroeder in your first deal and its acceptable. no need to trade Schroeder. and the 2nd deal is really bad. booth and ballard will be traded for late picks or bought out. why have Jensen on the 4th line? why have hansen on the 4th line? no for me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.