CanucksSayEh Posted April 26, 2013 Share Posted April 26, 2013 Meh, didn't expect much. They showed they can step it up, that extra gear is all that will matter a week from now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nucklehead Posted April 26, 2013 Share Posted April 26, 2013 A refresher on playing 60 minutes. Pro athletes seem to have attention deficit disorder. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Bookie Posted April 26, 2013 Share Posted April 26, 2013 Corrado suddenly looks 500x worse... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FanInCalgary Posted April 26, 2013 Share Posted April 26, 2013 Why so negative... They've won more games than any other team the past four years.... your favourite team is winning more than everyteam in north America and u have no faith? Come on man... believe. Especially when they've done so well for half a decade Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DIBdaQUIB Posted April 26, 2013 Share Posted April 26, 2013 I thought Lu was actually quite good. It was very exciting at the end. The rest was.. Bleh... What ever, this game meant nothing. So it doesn't bother me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rampage Posted April 26, 2013 Share Posted April 26, 2013 Whats with the friggin passing on a 6 on damn 4 ?! I swear we kill our PP more than the other team does. Also, why the F wasn't Garrison unleashing his bombs on that last PP? Didn't he score our only damn goal on a point shot?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DIBdaQUIB Posted April 26, 2013 Share Posted April 26, 2013 Whats with the friggin passing on a 6 on damn 4 ?! I swear we kill our PP more than the other team does. Also, why the F wasn't Garrison unleashing his bombs on that last PP? Didn't he score our only damn goal on a point shot?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cmpunk Posted April 26, 2013 Share Posted April 26, 2013 Dude, don't sugar coat it. It was a bad goal. Luongo played okay otherwise. Our team just didn't have any compete tonight. I agree dude, the fans should have shown Luongo some more respect. Honestly though, I think a lot of the fans simply didn't realize it might be the last home game he plays for us. They should have publicized that better before the game or something (I didn't know it until it was mentioned during the game) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted April 26, 2013 Share Posted April 26, 2013 Had to leave after the 1st. How did Corrado look? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gman Posted April 26, 2013 Share Posted April 26, 2013 Was a bad goal, I guess I am saying there are worse as those kinds can fool a goalie sometimes and seen it before. But who cares as I said can't score 2 goals then you got problems. What you guys going to say now we lost because Luongo let in 2 goals? But when Schneider loses 5-1 to the stars, he played great? lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PlayoffHockey Posted April 26, 2013 Share Posted April 26, 2013 Corrado suddenly looks 500x worse... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cmpunk Posted April 26, 2013 Share Posted April 26, 2013 Nope, meaningless game, doesn't matter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ForsbergTheGreat Posted April 26, 2013 Share Posted April 26, 2013 Hopefully mg smartens up n trades Cory so they can get an elite guy like duchene instead of scrivener n picks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
apollo Posted April 26, 2013 Share Posted April 26, 2013 Enough with the Duchene. yes he is good, no he is not moving from COL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gman Posted April 26, 2013 Share Posted April 26, 2013 If it was meaningful, so you would then say we lost because he let in 2? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nuck nit Posted April 26, 2013 Share Posted April 26, 2013 Lolz. Ebbett plays a better defensive game than Schroeder? Sorry man, there's not a stat (advanced or regular) that will help you affirm that one. Schroeder is a positive possession player, Ebbett is the exact opposite. This means, when Schroeders on the ice - his team has the puck more than when he's off it. With Ebbett, exact opposite. Whether Ebb plays 5 mins or 20 mins, if the other team always has the puck -he's a liability to his team. He's a better defensive option that Ebbett, you won't find an adavnced stats guy in the world who would say otherwise. My guess is they reached their max call up limit, therefore Schroeders not here. The only thing I can think of. Corrado, ya I noticed that as well - on 2 occasions. Not a big deal, all d-men do it. When you start in your own zone more than any other d-pairing it's gonna happen. Esp when you're not comfortable with the systems (as a new player). Garrison did the exact same thing when he first arrived, not anymore as he's more comfortable w/ the system. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ForsbergTheGreat Posted April 26, 2013 Share Posted April 26, 2013 My point is a player of his caliber is what u can get for Cory Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
apollo Posted April 26, 2013 Share Posted April 26, 2013 Nope, not a great second goal but those happen sometimes. If it's kept at two he is giving the team a chance to win. On a lighter note, funny gif Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smashian Kassian Posted April 26, 2013 Share Posted April 26, 2013 You're letting these guys off too easily. THey have played far too many games this year exactly like tonight. Bad habits form this way. Everyone seems to believe the "real Canucks" are the ones that played CHicago the other night. Why? Maybe that was just an emotional high they got going but is unsustainable. After all, tonight is consistent with how they played most nights this year. For a team going into the playoffs that is still struggling with line juggling and D pairs, has had idfficulty playing a full 60 minutes all year and with Lu possibly playing his last regular season game at home, one would think they could have at least pretended to try, oir....what we saw all year is what this team is and the Chicago game was an anomaly. We won't know until the playoffs start but I'm not so confident this team can bring the Chicago effort every night. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
falcon45ca Posted April 26, 2013 Share Posted April 26, 2013 Thanks for the memories Lou, though who the hell really knows what MG will do...I sure don't. This game almost perfectly encapsulated the real issue with the Canucks this year, and that's consistency. But the playoffs are a whole new season, so GO CANUCKS GO!!!!!! LOUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU!!!!!!!! Let's get ya a ring & a drink from Stanley for your going away present. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.