Raph Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 Ebbett TOI: 5:33. Reason for losing: Ebbett Logic win. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lexluthor Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 They've been playing this way all season long. Its no different in the playoffs. Sharks didn't even have to try that hard to beat us in our own rink. Good luck to the Sharks in the next round. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henrik Kesler Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 The Sedins don't seem to have their killer instinct they had in 2011 up until the Finals. Both Henrik and Daniel had glorious chances in the slot that they hesitated on instead of shooting right away. Daniel especially has to shoot since he is the Sedin who is supposed to be the goal scorer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DIBdaQUIB Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 Canucks: 37 hits in first 2 periods, 3 in the 3rd period. This stat tells a lot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avicii Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 Schroeder could have done what Ebbett did just by sitting on the bench. Ebbett was a complete non factor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canucksnihilist Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 Just what we need... Play great in Chicago game - so obviously you break up all those forward lines..... And take your foot off the gas ... Frustrating to watch Bah. Kesler looks like a shadow. Sedins are coasting. We can't score. Been a year and a half since anyone really thinks this team can win. Prove me wrong! Please! I'd settle for : I'm not as good as I once was, but I'm as good once as I ever was... If that was all we get for a playoff game - 1 period of solid effort - the window is already closed. Losing a game I'm fine with - but not even skating and coasting is tough to watch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 yeah we're paying him too much like 600k money we aren't getting back! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mustapha Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 One image in my mind after tonight's loss: www.google.ca Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NUCKS4CUP 28 Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 he played great in the first and second period nobody is denying that but he was average and dare i say below average in the third period but he got no goal support so all is forgiven right Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shazzam Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 wow ebbett takes alot of heat our core guys up front are the biggest problem Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SergioMomesso Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 They've been playing this way all season long. Its no different in the playoffs. Good luck to the Sharks in the next round. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wc84 Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 My thoughts: Luongo played really well. In fact, with Schneider's poor regular season performance, it wouldn't surprise me if the coaching staff told the doctors not to clear him to play. This way, you avoid the controversy of having him sitting on the bench, and you get to start Luongo who has a good history playing the Sharks. Especially after the last game vs the Oilers. He's got something to prove, and he played well. We had some good chances. A few posts, and when we pulled Luo, we played great for that last minute. This loss is on Kassian. Stupid freakin' penalty, and killed our momentum. Up until that point of the second, we were controlling. We've GOT to be better on the dot. Ebbett is the worst player in Canucks history. It was 1 game. VERY evenly matched teams it's scary. We can play better than we did today. We can win, but series is most likely going to 7 and it'll take a bit of luck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coastal1 Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 Luongo meltdown.. I'm sorry, what? Are you high? Lu played incredible. The second goal never should have happened, and the third goal was redirected by Hamhuis. The first goal was a nice goal. ...you were saying? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ey40 Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 So, how many more times will you be posting that comment before you work of the nerve to swallow the truth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Vintage Canuck- Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 Luongo "we saw the type of goals scored: banging, hacking, pitch-forking in the crease. That's the way it's going to be." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheTruthHurts Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 HEY NOBODY TALKS TO APPLES LIKE THAT APOLOGIZE NOW!!!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coastal1 Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 The team that played tonight won't win a game. The team that played against chicago can win the next 5. simple as that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wesley Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 Vancouver has had many bad 3rd periods this season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
schlaBAM Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 he played great in the first and second period nobody is denying that but he was average and dare i say below average in the third period but he got no goal support so all is forgiven right Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canucksnihilist Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 If - the Canucks can find their speed game they could still win Where is the run and gun team that we all knew and loved? Av Neanderthal - Ballard back please! Drop Alberts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.