Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

Kelly Sutherland explanation for call on Daniel Sedin


J529

Recommended Posts

You should bump him up to 2nd start then because he also drew the Bieksa one. Heck, i'd say drawing the tying and game winning penalties should give you the first star...More of that from him and he could have his name in the mix to win the Conn Smythe!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is no way you don't call that an interference penalty, regardless who is it against.

Wingles was no where near the puck. Look at where Henrik touched the puck and where Wingles got hit.

I'm not trolling, just seeing it in a different perspective and not as a blind homer fan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is no way you don't call that an interference penalty, regardless who is it against.

Wingles was no where near the puck. Look at where Henrik touched the puck and where Wingles got hit.

I'm not trolling, just seeing it in a different perspective.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Game 1: ERIC FURLATT, FRANCOIS ST. LAURENT

Game 2: TOM KOWAL, BRAD WATSON

Game 3: MARC JOANNETTE, BRIAN POCHMARA

Game 4: KELLY SUTHERLAND, CHRIS LEE

Ref history from the 4 games

Game 1&2: STEVE MILLER, MARK WHELER

Game 3&4: STEVE BARTON, GREG DEVORSKI

Linesmen from the last 4 games.

Funny how game 4 was the worst for reffing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I also find it funny how, Perry's hit on Zucker deserves 5, a game misconduct and 4 games. Where as this hit not nearly as brutal, but in the same area, doesn't warrant a penalty at all, rather its called a good puck battle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...