sam13371337 Posted May 8, 2013 Share Posted May 8, 2013 Have you driven a car before? What does the little writing on the side mirrors say? Go look at the video on page 2 and slow it down near the 12 and 13 secs mark. Then, go check where the puck flys off to and where the hit takes place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sugar baby watermelon Posted May 8, 2013 Share Posted May 8, 2013 ....Oh please, Daniel Sedin hitting anyone that hard is laughable, the guy sold the call really well. If any of our players went down like that they'd be sent to the box for embellishment as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sugar baby watermelon Posted May 8, 2013 Share Posted May 8, 2013 It's a physical battle for puck position. It happens 50 times a game. Dank was strong - Wingels went limp for the call. Would that get called in the STL/LA series? Let alone in OT of an elimination game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kassians_fist Posted May 8, 2013 Share Posted May 8, 2013 I don't understand how this guy still has a job. Every time he refs a game for us I see red. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nuckster1970 Posted May 8, 2013 Share Posted May 8, 2013 why are you trying so hard to convince everyone its a good call? When clearly at best its 50/50. and when considered in the context of 24 to 11 penalty margin, Other 50/50 calls that went against us, this particular refs history with the team, and the fact that this is a canucks site and people are generally going to be pro-canuck. The fact that in light of all that, its extremely important for you to repeatedly try and somehow "prove" its a good call leads one to suspect your a troll... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brewdog Posted May 8, 2013 Share Posted May 8, 2013 Sigh... I miss the days when a player near the boards would actually brace himself for a hit instead of slumping lifelessly to the ice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J529 Posted May 8, 2013 Author Share Posted May 8, 2013 Paul Bissonnette @BizNasty2point0 3h Not a penalty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
M A K A V E L I 96 Posted May 8, 2013 Share Posted May 8, 2013 Another ridiculous call. This led to the tying goal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shiznak Posted May 8, 2013 Share Posted May 8, 2013 why are you trying so hard to convince everyone its a good call? When clearly at best its 50/50. and when considered in the context of 24 to 11 penalty margin, Other 50/50 calls that went against us, this particular refs history with the team, and the fact that this is a canucks site and people are generally going to be pro-canuck. The fact that in light of all that, its extremely important for you to repeatedly try and somehow "prove" its a good call leads one to suspect your a troll... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
a Fool Posted May 8, 2013 Share Posted May 8, 2013 I also find it funny how, Perry's hit on Zucker deserves 5, a game misconduct and 4 games. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brewdog Posted May 8, 2013 Share Posted May 8, 2013 What's most impressive is how a shoulder check from Daniel Sedin The Incredible Hulk can cause Wingels' entire body to instantly go limp from the neck down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Common sense Posted May 8, 2013 Share Posted May 8, 2013 or, maybe we should let women referee, after all, they are the fairer sex. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UFCanuck Posted May 8, 2013 Share Posted May 8, 2013 Wingels, Brown, Doughty and Marchand in a dive off let's go! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrBuns Posted May 8, 2013 Share Posted May 8, 2013 Because every time the Canucks lose its because of the refs, and it's not just this series. It's been going on since 2010. People on CDC think there is some sort of conspiracy against us, that the league hates the Canucks. I mean seriously, if CDC were hired to ref a game, the penalties will favour the Canucks every single time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
austy Posted May 8, 2013 Share Posted May 8, 2013 Another ridiculous call. This led to the tying goal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coyotecanuck Posted May 8, 2013 Share Posted May 8, 2013 Because every time the Canucks lose its because of the refs, and it's not just this series. It's been going on since 2010. People on CDC think there is some sort of conspiracy against us, that the league hates the Canucks. I mean seriously, if CDC were hired to ref a game, the penalties will favour the Canucks every single time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coyotecanuck Posted May 8, 2013 Share Posted May 8, 2013 Wingels, Brown, Doughty and Marchand in a dive off let's go! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shiznak Posted May 8, 2013 Share Posted May 8, 2013 Well at least we know you're trolling now. Zucker played the puck up the boards and watched his pass. Perry hit him from behind after the play. Not even close to what happened with Sedin and Wingles battling for the lose puck. w/e. Nice troll, you got me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CHIPS Posted May 8, 2013 Share Posted May 8, 2013 Sleep well at nights Sutherland. And make sure to teach your kids how to cheat to win like you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
austy Posted May 8, 2013 Share Posted May 8, 2013 So your mission in life is to prove that people on CDC are biased? My god you are the gift that keeps on giving. When do you think the last time the Canucks had more PP chances in a series than their opponents? The answer may surprise you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.